Common use of Responsive Pleadings Clause in Contracts

Responsive Pleadings. 21. The Georgia System Operations Corporation (GSOC) argues that NERC’s pro forma Common Attributes governing the development of reliability standards are, in certain respects, vague and require clarification. GSOC submits, for example, that the term “functional classes of entities,” as used in Common Attribute 32,24 and the term “proxies,” as used in Common Attribute 33,25 are vague and require clarification. GSOC also recommends that NERC make additional editorial revisions.26 Clear identification of the functional classes of entities responsible for complying with the standard, noting any specific additions or exceptions. If not applicable to the entire [Regional Entity Name] area, then a clear identification of the portion of the Bulk-Power System to which the standard applies. Any limitation on the applicability of the standards based on electric facility requirements should be described.

Responsive Pleadings. 21. The Georgia System Operations Corporation (GSOC) argues that NERC’s pro forma Common Attributes governing the development of reliability standards are, in certain respects, vague and require clarification. GSOC submits, for example, that the term “functional classes of entities,” as used in Common Attribute 32,24 and the term “proxies,” as used in Common Attribute 33,25 are vague and require clarification. GSOC also recommends that NERC make additional editorial revisions.26 24 Common Attribute 32 provides: Clear identification of the functional classes of entities responsible for complying with the standard, noting any specific additions or exceptions. If not applicable to the entire [Regional Entity Name] area, then a clear identification of the portion of the Bulk-Power System to which the standard applies. Any limitation on the applicability of the standards based on electric facility requirements should be described.