RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION Poor, partial or late implementation of the Project may be established by the NA on the basis of the final report submitted by the beneficiary (including reports from individual participants taking part in the mobility activities). The NA may consider also information received from any other relevant source, proving that the Project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits, desk checks or on the spot checks undertaken by the NA. The final report will be assessed on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, the NA may reduce the final grant amount for organisational support on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the action even if all activities reported were eligible and actually took place. In the case of accredited organisations, if the NA considers that the implementation of the Project does not respect the quality commitment undertaken by the beneficiary, the NA may in addition or alternatively require the beneficiary to develop and implement an action plan within an agreed timeframe to ensure respect of the applicable requirements. If the beneficiary does not implement the action plan in a satisfactory manner by the due date, the NA may recommend to the European Commission to withdraw the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education of the beneficiary. The final report will be assessed in conjunction with the reports from the mobility participants, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: The extent to which the action was implemented in line with the grant agreement. The extent to which the action was implemented in respect of the quality and compliance requirements set out in the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education and in the applicable inter-institutional agreement(s). The extent to which the grant amounts due to mobility participants were transferred to them in accordance with the contractual provisions set out in the agreement between the beneficiary and the participant following the templates provided in Annex VI of the Agreement. A grant reduction based on poor, partial or late implementation may be applied to the final amount of eligible expenses for organisational support and may be of: 25% if the final report scores at least 40 points and below 50 points; 50% if the final report scores at least 25 points and below 40 points; 75% if the final report scores below 25 points.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: Annex Iii, www.erasmusplus.is
RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION • Poor, partial or late implementation of the Project may be established by the NA on the basis of the of: - The final report submitted by the beneficiary (including reports from individual participants taking part in coordinator; - The products and outputs produced by the mobility activities). project; • The NA may consider also information received from any other relevant source, proving that the Project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits, desk checks or on the spot checks undertaken by the NA. • The final report will be assessed evaluated on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, the NA may reduce the final grant amount for organisational support on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the action Project even if all activities reported were eligible and actually took place. • In the case of accredited organisations, if the NA considers that the implementation of the Project does not respect the quality commitment undertaken by the beneficiarybeneficiaries, the NA may in addition or alternatively require impose the beneficiary to develop and implement implementation of an action plan within an agreed timeframe to ensure respect of the applicable requirementsquality and compliance requirements by the beneficiaries concerned within a given timeframe. If the beneficiary does beneficiaries do not implement the action plan in a satisfactory manner satisfactorily by the due date, the NA may recommend to the European Commission to withdraw the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education accreditation of the beneficiarybeneficiaries concerned. • The final report report, products and outputs will be assessed in conjunction with by the reports from the mobility participantsNA, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: - The extent to which the action project was implemented in line with the approved grant agreement. application - The quality of activities undertaken and their consistency with the project objectives - The quality of the products and outputs produced - The learning outcomes and impact on participants - The extent to which the action was implemented in respect of the quality and compliance requirements set out in the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education and in the applicable inter-institutional agreement(s). project proved to be innovative/complementary to other initiatives - The extent to which the grant amounts due project proved to mobility participants were transferred add value at EU level - The extent to them in accordance with which the contractual provisions set out in project implemented effective quality measures as well as measures for evaluating the agreement between project's outcomes - The impact on the beneficiary participating organisations - In case of learning, teaching and training activities: the participant following quality of the templates practical arrangements provided in Annex VI support of the Agreement. mobility, in terms of preparation, monitoring and support to participants during their mobility activity, the quality arrangements for the recognition/validation of the learning outcomes of participants - The quality and scope of the dissemination activities undertaken - The potential wider impact of the project on individuals and organisations beyond the beneficiaries • A grant reduction based on poor, partial or late implementation may be applied to the total final amount of eligible expenses for organisational support and may be of: - 25% if the final report scores at least 40 points and below 50 points; - 50% if the final report scores at least 25 points and below 40 points; - 75% if the final report scores below 25 points.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: smlouvy.gov.cz, smlouvy.gov.cz
RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION - Poor, partial or late implementation of the Project may be established by the NA on the basis of the final report submitted by the beneficiary (including reports from individual participants taking part in the mobility activities). - The NA may consider also information received from any other relevant source, proving that the Project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits, desk checks or on the spot checks undertaken by the NA. - The final report will be assessed on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, the NA may reduce the final grant amount for organisational support on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the action even if all activities reported were eligible and actually took place. - In the case of accredited organisations, if the NA considers that the implementation of the Project does not respect the quality commitment undertaken by the beneficiary, the NA may in addition or alternatively require the beneficiary to develop and implement an action plan within an agreed timeframe to ensure respect of the applicable requirements. If the beneficiary does not implement the action plan in a satisfactory manner by the due date, the NA may recommend to the European Commission to withdraw the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education of the beneficiary. - The final report will be assessed in conjunction with the reports from the mobility participants, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: - The extent to which the action was implemented in line with the grant agreement. - The extent to which the action was implemented in respect of the quality and compliance requirements set out in the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education and in the applicable inter-institutional agreement(s)Education. - The extent to which the grant amounts due to mobility participants were transferred to them in accordance with the contractual provisions set out in the agreement between the beneficiary and the participant following the templates provided in Annex VI V of the Agreement. .] - A grant reduction based on poor, partial or late implementation may be applied to the final amount of eligible expenses for organisational support and may be of: 25% if the final report scores at least 40 points and below 50 points; 50% if the final report scores at least 25 points and below 40 points; 75% if the final report scores below 25 points.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: erasmusplus.at
RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION • Poor, partial or late implementation of the Project may be established by the NA on the basis of the final report submitted by the beneficiary (including reports from individual participants taking part in the mobility activities). • The NA may consider also information received from any other relevant source, proving that the Project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits, desk checks or on the spot checks undertaken by the NA. • The final report will be assessed on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, the NA may reduce the final grant amount for organisational support on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the action even if all activities reported were eligible and actually took place. • In the case of accredited organisations, if the NA considers that the implementation of the Project does not respect the quality commitment undertaken by the beneficiary, the NA may in addition or alternatively require the beneficiary to develop and implement an action plan within an agreed timeframe to ensure respect of the applicable requirements. If the beneficiary does not implement the action plan in a satisfactory manner by the due date, the NA may recommend to the European Commission to withdraw the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education of the beneficiary. • The final report will be assessed in conjunction with the reports from the mobility participants, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: o The extent to which the action was implemented in line with the grant agreement. o The extent to which the action was implemented in respect of the quality and compliance requirements set out in the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education and in the applicable inter-institutional agreement(s). o The extent to which the grant amounts due to mobility participants were transferred to them in accordance with the contractual provisions set out in the agreement between the beneficiary and the participant following the templates provided in Annex VI of the Agreement. • A grant reduction based on poor, partial or late implementation may be applied to the final amount of eligible expenses for organisational support and may be of: 25% if the final report scores at least 40 points and below 50 points; 50% if the final report scores at least 25 points and below 40 points; 75% if the final report scores below 25 points.:
Appears in 1 contract
RULES AND CONDITIONS FOR GRANT REDUCTION. FOR POOR, PARTIAL OR LATE IMPLEMENTATION Poor, partial or late implementation of the Project may be established by the NA on the basis of the of: - The final report submitted by the beneficiary (including reports from individual participants taking part in coordinator; - The products and outputs produced by the mobility activities). project; The NA may consider also information received from any other relevant source, proving that the Project is not implemented in accordance with the contractual provisions. Other sources of information may include monitoring visits, desk checks or on the spot checks undertaken by the NA. The final report will be assessed evaluated on the basis of quality criteria and scored on a total of maximum 100 points. If the final report scores below 50 points in total, the NA may reduce the final grant amount for organisational support on the basis of poor, partial or late implementation of the action Project even if all activities reported were eligible and actually took place. In the case of accredited organisations, if the NA considers that the implementation of the Project does not respect the quality commitment undertaken by the beneficiarybeneficiaries, the NA may in addition or alternatively require impose the beneficiary to develop and implement implementation of an action plan within an agreed timeframe to ensure respect of the applicable requirementsquality and compliance requirements by the beneficiaries concerned within a given timeframe. If the beneficiary does beneficiaries do not implement the action plan in a satisfactory manner satisfactorily by the due date, the NA may recommend to the European Commission to withdraw the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education accreditation of the beneficiarybeneficiaries concerned. The final report report, products and outputs will be assessed in conjunction with by the reports from the mobility participantsNA, using a common set of quality criteria focusing on: - The extent to which the action project was implemented in line with the approved grant agreement. application - The quality of activities undertaken and their consistency with the project objectives - The quality of the products and outputs produced - The learning outcomes and impact on participants - The extent to which the action was implemented in respect of the quality and compliance requirements set out in the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education and in the applicable inter-institutional agreement(s). project proved to be innovative/complementary to other initiatives - The extent to which the grant amounts due project proved to mobility participants were transferred add value at EU level - The extent to them in accordance with which the contractual provisions set out in project implemented effective quality measures as well as measures for evaluating the agreement between project's outcomes - The impact on the beneficiary participating organisations - In case of learning, teaching and training activities: the participant following quality of the templates practical arrangements provided in Annex VI support of the Agreement. mobility, in terms of preparation, monitoring and support to participants during their mobility activity, the quality arrangements for the recognition/validation of the learning outcomes of participants - The quality and scope of the dissemination activities undertaken - The potential wider impact of the project on individuals and organisations beyond the beneficiaries A grant reduction based on poor, partial or late implementation may be applied to the total final amount of eligible expenses for organisational support and may be of: - 25% if the final report scores at least 40 points and below 50 points; - 50% if the final report scores at least 25 points and below 40 points; - 75% if the final report scores below 25 points.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: smlouvy.gov.cz
