SECURITIES CORP. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 414.) Under these decisions, were a finding on procedural unconscionability necessary, the majority should remand for the trial court to consider the issue rather than resolve it in Xxxxxxx‘s favor in the first instance on appeal. The majority offers no explanation for departing from our precedents.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: www.severson.com, f.datasrvr.com, www.gmsr.com
SECURITIES CORP. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 394, 414.) Under these decisions, were a finding on procedural unconscionability necessary, the majority should remand for the trial court to consider the issue rather than resolve it in Xxxxxxx‘s Xxxxxxx’x favor in the first instance on appeal. The majority offers no explanation for departing from our precedents.
Appears in 2 contracts
Samples: www.courts.ca.gov, www.impactlitigation.com