Selection Factors Clause Samples
Selection Factors. Factors which influence selection of professional personnel are as follows:
a. Training and certification
b. Professional competence
c. Personality and compatibility d. Suitability for the position e. Professional attitude
Selection Factors. The merit review ratings shall provide a rank order to the Selecting Official for final funding recommendations. The CRCP competition manager may make recommendations to the Selecting Official applying the selection factors below. The Selecting Official shall award in rank order unless there is justification for selecting a proposal out of rank order based upon one or more of the following factors:
1. Availability of funding
2. Balance/distribution of funds
a. Geographically
b. By type of institutions
c. By type of partners
d. By research area
e. By project types
3. Whether this project duplicates other projects funded or considered for funding by NOAA/Federal agencies
4. Program priorities and policy factors as described in Section I of this Federal funding opportunity.
5. Applicant's prior award performance 6. Partnerships and/or participation of targeted groups 7. Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a NEPA determination and draft necessary documentation before recommendations for funding are made to the Grants Officer. The Selecting Official or designee may negotiate the funding level of the proposal.
Selection Factors. Seniority in accordance with Article 6.1 shall be the determining factor in selecting the successful applicant provided the applicant possesses the required qualifications for the position vacancy.
Selection Factors. The Selecting Official, an official within the Office for Coastal Management (or their designee) anticipates recommending applications for funding in rank order unless an application is justified to be selected out of rank order based upon one or more of the following selection factors:
1. Availability of funding;
2. Balance/distribution of funds: a) by geographic area, b) by type of institutions, c) by type of partners, d) by research areas, or e) by project types;
3. Whether this project duplicates other projects funded or considered for funding by NOAA or other federal agencies;
4. Program priorities and policy factors set out in Sections I.A. and I.B.;
5. An applicant's prior award performance;
6. Partnerships and/or participation of targeted groups; and
7. Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a NEPA determination and draft necessary documentation before recommendations for funding are made to the NOAA Grants Management Division.
Selection Factors a. Seniority in accordance with Article 6.1 shall be the determining factor in selecting the successful applicant provided the applicant possesses the required qualifications for the position vacancy.
b. For the purposes of this clause, “designated positions” will refer to those positions that have been negotiated by the Union and the Employer for applicants with First Nations, Métis, and Inuit heritage. For appointment to designated positions, seniority in accordance with Article 6.1 shall be the determining factor in selecting the successful applicant among internal applicants with First Nations, Métis, and/or Inuit heritage provided the applicant possesses the required qualifications for the position vacancy.
Selection Factors. If in Management’s judgment two or more applicants are equally qualified, length of service will be the determining factor. Qualified in-house candidates and qualified Employees on layoff with recall rights will be given preference over outside applicants.
Selection Factors. The Selecting Official, an official within the Office for Coastal Management (or their designee) anticipates recommending applications for funding in rank order unless an application is justified to be selected out of rank order based upon one or more of the following selection factors:
(1) Availability of funding;
(2) Balance/distribution of funds: a) by geographic area, b) by type of institutions, c) by type of partners, d) by research areas; or e) by project types;
(3) Whether this project duplicates other projects funded or considered for funding by NOAA or other federal agencies;
(4) Program priorities and policy factors set out in Sections I.A. and I.B.;
(5) An applicant's prior award performance;
(6) Partnerships and/or participation of targeted groups; and
(7) Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA staff to make a NEPA determination and draft necessary documentation before recommendations for funding are made to the NOAA GMD. The Selecting Official or designee may negotiate the funding level of the proposal. Hence, awards may not necessarily be made to the highest-scored applications. Unsuccessful applicants will be notified that their application was not among those recommended for funding. Unsuccessful applications submitted in hard copy will be kept on file in accordance with NOAA records requirements and then destroyed. NOAA may select all, some, or none of the applications, or part of any application, ask applicants to work together or combine projects, defer applications to the future, or reallocate funds to different funding categories, to the extent authorized. Applicants may be asked to modify objectives, work plans or budgets, and provide supplemental information required by the agency prior to the award. The exact amount of funds to be awarded, the final scope of activities, the project duration, and specific NOAA cooperative involvement with the activities of each project will be determined in pre-award negotiations among the applicant, the NOAA Grants Office, and NOAA program staff. Risk Review: After applications are proposed for funding by the selecting official, the Grants Office will perform administration reviews. These may include assessments of the financial stability of an applicant and the quality of the applicant’s management systems, history of performance, and the applicant’s ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements imposed on non-Federal entities. Special conditions that address any...
Selection Factors. The Merit review ratings shall provide a rank order to the Selecting Official for final funding recommendations. The Selecting Official shall award in the rank order unless the proposal is justified to be selected out of rank order based upon one or more of the following factors:
1. Availability of funding
2. Balance and distribution of funds:
a. By research area
b. By project type
c. By type of institution d. By type of partner
Selection Factors. The review and selection process shall provide a rank order of proposals that will be presented to the Selecting Official for final funding recommendations. The CRCP competition manager may make recommendations to the Selecting Official applying the selection factors below. The Selecting Official shall award in rank order unless there is justification for selecting a proposal out of rank order based upon one or more of the following factors:
1. Availability of funding.
2. Balance/distribution of funds:
a. Geographically;
b. By type of institutions;
c. By type of partners;
d. By research areas;
e. By project types;
3. Whether this project duplicates other projects funded or considered for funding by NOAA or other federal agencies;
4. Program priorities and policy factors as stated in Section I of this funding opportunity;
5. Applicant's prior award performance;
6. Partnerships and/or participation of targeted groups; and
7. Adequacy of information necessary for NOAA to make a NEPA determination and draft necessary documentation before recommendations for funding are made to the NOAA Grants Officer. The Selecting Official or designee may negotiate the funding level of the proposal.