SMARTS Litigation Sample Clauses

SMARTS Litigation. On October 31, 1997, a lawsuit was filed against Avesta Technologies, Inc. ("Avesta") and Davix Xxxxx (x founder and, at the time, an employee of Avesta) by Systems Management ARTS Incorporated ("SMARTS") in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging unfair competition, unjust enrichment and that Avesta and Mr. Xxxxx xxxringed two patents held by SMARTS. The complaint also alleges interference with contractual relations against Avesta, as well as a claim of breach of contract against Mr. Xxxxx. Xxesta answered the complaint, denying all allegations, and also asserted counterclaims against SMARTS for patent misuse, unfair competition, interference with business and patent invalidity.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to SMARTS Litigation

  • Investigations; Litigation There is no investigation or review pending (or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened) by any Governmental Entity with respect to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries which would have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, and there are no actions, suits, inquiries, investigations or proceedings pending (or, to Parent’s knowledge, threatened) against or affecting Parent or its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties at law or in equity before, and there are no orders, judgments or decrees of, or before, any Governmental Entity, in each case which would have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.

  • Certain Litigation The Company agrees that it shall not settle any litigation commenced after the date hereof against the Company or any of its directors by any shareholder of the Company relating to the Offer, the Merger, this Agreement, or the Shareholder Agreement, without the prior written consent of Parent. In addition, except as provided in Section 6.2(c), the Company shall not voluntarily cooperate with any third party that may hereafter seek to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger and shall cooperate with Parent and Sub to resist any such effort to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger.

  • Settlement of Litigation Hanover shall not, nor shall it permit any of its Subsidiaries to, settle any litigation, investigation, arbitration, proceeding or other claim if Hanover or any of its subsidiaries would be required to pay in excess of $10,000 individually or in the aggregate or if such settlement would obligate Hanover to take any material action or restrict Hanover in any material respect from taking any action at or after the Effective Time.

  • Third Party Litigation The undersigned agrees to be available to the Company and its affiliates on a reasonable basis in connection with any pending or threatened claims, charges or litigation in which the Company or any of its affiliates is now or may become involved, or any other claims or demands made against or upon the Company or any of its affiliates, regardless of whether or not the undersigned is a named defendant in any particular case.

  • Transaction Litigation In the event that any stockholder litigation related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is brought, or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened, against the Company or any Indemnified Party from and following the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time (such litigation, other than any Proceeding in connection with, arising out of or otherwise related to a demand for appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL, which shall be governed by Section 4.2(g), “Transaction Litigation”), the Company shall as promptly as practicable (a) notify Parent thereof and shall keep Parent reasonably informed with respect to the status thereof, (b) give Parent an opportunity to participate in the defense and/or settlement (at Parent’s sole expense and subject to a customary joint defense agreement) of any Transaction Litigation, (c) timely consult with Parent with respect to the defense and/or settlement of any Transaction Litigation and (d) shall consider in good faith Parent’s advice and recommendations with respect to such Transaction Litigation. The Company shall not agree to settle or offer to settle any Transaction Litigation without the prior written consent of Parent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned).

  • Defense of Litigation To appear in and defend any action or proceeding that may affect its title to or Secured Party’s interest in the Collateral.

  • Dismissal of Litigation Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Summit, VISX and Pillar Point shall cause all of the Summit/VISX Litigation (as hereinafter defined) to be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. As used herein, "Summit/VISX Litigation" means VISX Partner, Inc. v. Summit Partner, Inc., Santx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Court, Case No. CV 772057; VISX, Incorporated v. Pillar Point Partners, et al., Santx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Court, Case No. 770042; and VISX Partner, Inc., on behalf Pillar Point Partners, United States District Court, District Of Massachusetts, Case No. 96-11739-PBS. The term "Summit/VISX Litigation" includes all counterclaims, cross-claims and the like asserted in the foregoing actions.

  • Compliance with Laws; Litigation Except as described in the CCA Disclosure Schedule or in the Prison Realty Filed SEC Documents, there are no claims, actions, suits, arbitration, grievances, proceedings or investigations pending or, to CCA's knowledge, threatened, against CCA or any Subsidiary, or any properties or rights of CCA or any Subsidiary, or any officers or directors of CCA or any Subsidiary in their capacity as such, by or before any Governmental Entity which, individually or in the aggregate, is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on CCA or prevent, materially delay or intentionally delay the ability of CCA to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. Neither CCA nor its Subsidiaries is subject to any judgment, order or decree which could reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect. Each of CCA and its Subsidiaries has at all times operated and currently operates its business in conformity in all material respects with all applicable statutes, common laws, ordinances, decrees, orders, rules and regulations of Governmental Entities. Each of CCA and its Subsidiaries has all licenses, approvals or consents to operate its businesses in all locations in which such businesses are currently being operated, and to its knowledge is not aware of any existing or imminent matter which may materially adversely impact its operations or business prospects other than as specifically disclosed in the CCA Disclosure Schedule. CCA and each Subsidiary have not failed to file with the applicable regulatory authorities any material statements, reports, information or forms required by all applicable laws, regulations or orders, all such filings or submissions were in material compliance with applicable laws when filed, and no material deficiencies have been asserted by any regulatory commission, agency or authority with respect to such filings or submissions. CCA and each Subsidiary have not failed to maintain in full force and effect any material licenses, registrations or permits necessary or proper for the conduct of its or their business, or received any notification that any revocation or limitation thereof is threatened or pending, and there is not to the knowledge of CCA pending any change under any law, regulation, license or permit which would materially adversely affect the business, operations, property or business prospects of CCA. CCA and each Subsidiary have not received any notice of violation of or been threatened with a charge of violating and are not under investigation with respect to a possible violation of any provision of any law, regulation or order. Neither CCA nor any of its Subsidiaries has at any time (i) made any unlawful contribution to any candidate for domestic or foreign office or failed to disclose fully any contribution in violation of law or (ii) made any payment to any federal or state governmental officer or official, or other person charged with similar public or quasi-public duties, other than payments required or permitted by the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction thereof.

  • Shareholder Litigation The Company shall give Parent the opportunity to participate in the defense or settlement of any shareholder litigation against the Company and/or its directors relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and no such settlement shall be agreed to without Parent’s prior written consent.

  • Control of Litigation The Parties agree and acknowledge that Sellers shall be entitled exclusively to control, defend and settle any litigation, administrative or regulatory proceeding, and any investigation or other activities arising out of or related to any Excluded Liabilities and Buyer agrees to cooperate with Sellers in connection therewith.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.