Third Party Litigation Sample Clauses

Third Party Litigation. The undersigned agrees to be available to the Company and its affiliates on a reasonable basis in connection with any pending or threatened claims, charges or litigation in which the Company or any of its affiliates is now or may become involved, or any other claims or demands made against or upon the Company or any of its affiliates, regardless of whether or not the undersigned is a named defendant in any particular case.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Third Party Litigation. In the event that a Third Party institutes a patent, trade secret, trademark or other infringement suit against Emergent or its Affiliates or sublicensees during the term of this Agreement, alleging that the practice by Emergent of the HPA Technology in the exercise of its rights as licensee under this Agreement infringes one or more patent, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual property rights held by such Third Party (an “Infringement Suit”), then (i) as between the Parties, Emergent shall assume direction and control of the defense of claims arising therefrom (including the right to settle such claims at its sole discretion), and (ii) Emergent may withhold and deposit into an interest-bearing escrow account [**] percent ([**]%) of all amounts that Emergent would otherwise be obligated to pay to HPA pursuant to Article V (the “Escrowed Amount”), and Emergent’s payment obligations to HPA under Article V shall be reduced accordingly, until such time as a final, non-appealable judgment is rendered with respect to such Infringement Suit by a court of competent jurisdiction, or the time permitted for appeal of a final, appealable judgment has lapsed (the “Final Judgment”). If Final Judgment is rendered in favor of Emergent (or its Affiliates or sublicensees, as the case may be), then Emergent shall pay to HPA, within ten days after the entry of such judgment, the full amount of the Escrowed Amount. If the Final Judgment is rendered partially or entirely in favor of such Third Party, then Emergent may apply the Escrowed Amount to the payment of its defense costs in connection with such Infringement Suit and to the payment of any award it is required to pay pursuant to such Final Judgment. If the Escrowed Amount exceeds such defense costs and award then Emergent, within ten (10) days following the date of the Final Judgment, shall remit to HPA the amount of such excess. If the Escrowed Amount does not equal or exceed the amount of such defense costs and award, then from and after the date of the Final Judgment, Emergent shall be entitled to withhold [**] percent ([**]%) of all amounts that Emergent would otherwise be required to pay to HPA pursuant to Article V until such time as the aggregate amounts so withheld plus the Escrowed Amounts equals the amount of such defense costs and award.
Third Party Litigation. In the event that a Third Party institutes a patent, trademark or other infringement suit (including any suit alleging the invalidity or unenforceability of the Patents of a Party or its Affiliates, or claiming confusion, deception or dilution of a Trademark) against either Party or its respective Affiliates, licensees or Sublicensees during the Term, alleging use of the Licensed Technology, Licensed Trademarks or any other activities hereunder, infringes one or more patent, trademark or other intellectual property rights held by such Third Party (an "Infringement Suit"), the Parties shall cooperate with one another in defending such suit. NovaDel shall have the first right to direct and control any Infringement Suit to the extent that it relates to the use of the Licensed Technology, the Licensed Trademarks or the Licensed Process; provided that Licensee shall bear one hundred percent (100%) of the costs and expenses associated with any such Infringement Suit to the extent that it relates to the Exploitation of the Licensed Product.
Third Party Litigation. In the event a third party institutes a suit against COMPANY for patent infringement involving a Licensed Product, COMPANY will promptly inform MAYO and keep MAYO regularly informed of the proceedings. COMPANY agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless MAYO for any claims, demands or law suits related thereto.
Third Party Litigation. In the event of any actual or threatened suit against Flexion or its Affiliates, Sublicensees or customers alleging that the Exploitation of Compound or Licensed Products or that the Exploitation of a Licensed Patent or the Licensed Know-How or any part thereof hereunder infringes the Patent or Intellectual Property Rights of any Person, […***…] shall, at […***…], assume direction and control of the defence of claims arising therefrom; provided, however, that […***…] shall obtain the written consent of […***…], not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, prior to ceasing to defend, settling or otherwise compromising such claims with respect to any Licensed Patents and Licensed Know-How.
Third Party Litigation. In addition to its indemnity obligations set forth in Section 10.1, Landowner shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and City’s Affiliated Parties from and against any Claim against City or City’s Affiliated Parties seeking to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement, the Adopting Ordinance, any of the Development Regulations for the Project (including without limitation any actions taken pursuant to CEQA with respect thereto), any Subsequent Development Approval, or the approval of any permit granted pursuant to this Agreement. Said indemnity obligation shall include payment of reasonable attorney’s fees, expert witness fees, and court costs. City shall promptly notify Landowner of any such Claim and City shall cooperate with Landowner in the defense of such Claim. If City fails to promptly notify Landowner of such Claim, Landowner shall not be responsible to indemnify, defend, and hold City harmless from such Claim until Landowner is so notified and if City fails to cooperate in the defense of a Claim Landowner shall not be responsible to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City during the period that City so fails to cooperate or for any losses attributable thereto. City shall be entitled to retain separate counsel to represent City against the Claim and the City’s defense costs for its separate counsel shall be included in Landowner’s indemnity obligation, provided that such counsel shall reasonably cooperate with Landowner in an effort to minimize the total litigation expenses incurred by Landowner. In the event either City or Landowner recovers any attorney’s fees, expert witness fees, costs, interest, or other amounts from the party or parties asserting the Claim, Landowner shall be entitled to retain the same (provided it has fully performed its indemnity obligations hereunder). The indemnity provisions in this Section 10.2 shall commence on the Agreement Date, regardless of whether the Effective Date occurs, and shall survive the Termination Date.
Third Party Litigation. This Article 9 shall not apply in the event that a third party has commenced litigation against one or more Parties outside of Costa Rica (“Third Party Action”) and a defendant Party in the Third Party Action files a cross-complaint or third-party complaint against another Party that arises out of the same facts or transactions at issue in the Third Party Action.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Third Party Litigation. In the event that a Third Party institutes a Patent infringement suit (including any suit alleging the invalidity or unenforceability of the Patents) against either Party or its respective Affiliates, licensees or permitted Sublicensees during the Term, alleging that any activities hereunder, infringes one or more Patents, or other intellectual property rights held by such Third Party (an “Infringement Suit”), the Parties shall cooperate with one another in defending such suit; provided, that the Party responsible for directing and controlling the Infringement Suit (as provided hereinafter) shall reimburse the other Party for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in rendering such cooperation, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. Medarex shall direct and control, at its sole cost and expense, any Infringement Suit with respect to the HuMAb Technology and the Medarex Patents (including with respect to any inventions claimed or described therein). Celldex shall direct and control, at its sole cost and expense, any Infringement Suit with respect to the Antibody Targeting Patents (including with respect to any inventions claimed or described therein).
Third Party Litigation. Notwithstanding Section 7.4 or Section 7.5, in the event of any actual or threatened suit against Company, or its Affiliates, Licensees, distributors or customers alleging that the use of Regeneron Technology, the Mice, Mice Materials, Antibodies or Antibody Materials or the Exploitation of Subject Products by or on behalf of Company under this Agreement infringes the Patent Rights or other intellectual property rights of any Person (an “Infringement Suit”), Company shall be solely responsible for assuming direction and control of the defense of claims arising therefrom (including the right to settle such claims at its sole discretion), unless Company is seeking indemnification under the terms of Section 6.2.
Third Party Litigation. In the event that a Third Party institutes a Patent, Trademark or other infringement suit (including any suit alleging the invalidity or unenforceability of the Patents of a Party or its Affiliates, or claiming confusion, deception or dilution of a Trademark by a Product Trademark) against either Party or its respective Affiliates, licensees or permitted sublicensees during the Term, alleging that the Exploitation of the Collaboration Products in the Territory or any other activities hereunder, infringes one or more Patent, Trademark or other intellectual property rights held by such Third Party (an "Infringement Suit"), the Parties shall cooperate with one another in defending such suit. Except with respect to the Medarex Technology or the Seattle Genetics Technology, the Parties shall jointly direct and control any Infringement Suit with respect to Collaboration Products or any Joint Patents; provided, however, that no Party shall cease to defend, settle or otherwise dispose of a suit with respect to any intellectual property of the other Party without the prior written consent of such other Party. Each Party shall have the sole right to direct and control (including the right to cease to defend, settle or compromise) any Infringement Suit with respect to its Technology. The Parties shall [*] percent ([*]%) of any costs and expenses of such defense, except with respect to the Medarex Technology or the Seattle Genetics Technology, where Seattle Genetics and Medarex, respectively, shall only [*] percent ([*]%) of those costs and expenses with respect to the Exploitation of Collaboration Products and the other activities of the Parties hereunder.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.