Solutions descriptions and advancements Sample Clauses

Solutions descriptions and advancements. OptSFC is designed as an offline training tool that generates an optimized policy of a security function involving the management and orchestration of virtualized network resources. The RL model resulting from the offline training allows deploying the security function in the 5G network with autonomous and efficient prevention and mitigation actions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Solutions descriptions and advancements. AI and ML contributions Mouseworld This lab has been conceived as a network Digital Twin infrastructure created to produce datasets related to network threats and train ML models. Complex network emulation and testing can be carried out thanks to the equipment and tools. One of the main characteristics of the lab is the ability to create/destroy several network scenarios to run different tests. The virtual scenarios are isolated from each other thanks to the NFV/SDN architecture, and therefore the traffic can be captured using VNF probes. This consistent environment allows evaluating different mitigation tools or versions under the same circumstances, making it perfect for developing and tuning machine learning network instruments.
Solutions descriptions and advancements. AI and ML contributions The targeted poisoning attack on FL system is described as follows. Adversary controls C poisonous nodes where the system has total number of n nodes. We exploit the weaknesses of the existing FoolsGold design and perform a targeted model poisoning attack to circumvent its defence. For the experiments, we use a single layer fully-connected softmax for classification with MNIST digit classifier dataset [74]. FoolsGold algorithm (Figure 22) primarily depends on the Cosine Similarity (CS) of the received gradient updates. We intelligently introduce random noise to the gradient updates at poisonous nodes. The poisonous nodes train their local models with label flipped data and then add the noise before sending them to the central server. A noise vector specifically replaces a part of a given poisonous gradient update to add extra dissimilarity. Only the gradient updates corresponding to the less important features of the model is placed with noise while the vital features required for model training will not be propagated with noise. This ensures that the noise does not reduce the effectiveness of the attack. We use a subset of data at the devices using Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) method which reduces the training times. This is done in order to avoid the inconsistencies among training times due to the different amounts of data.
Solutions descriptions and advancements. ‌ To fill the aforementioned gaps, we leverage the potential of Deep Learning to build three solutions for tackling the stealthy DDoS attacks in a 5G environment, considering two settings (i.e., network slicing and multi-domain/multi-tenancy) and performing malicious behaviour detection either by using data collected from network layer (i.e., characteristics of network flows) or application layer (i.e., resource usage and service performance metrics).
Solutions descriptions and advancements. To date, there have been very few empirically published accounts of an effective GPS spoofing detection approach that accommodates resource, cost, and environmental constraints. For this purpose, we propose a new solution to devise an effective cellular-enabled UE GPS spoofing detection system, where MLP is used to analyse the statistical features of path losses between UE and base stations (BSs). The proposed approach consists of three processes, namely data sampling, statistical analysis, and MLP prediction. • Data sampling: There are two kinds of data that need to be collected in the processing, namely the actual path losses data and the theoretical path losses data. The actual path losses data are the observations of base stations, and the corresponding theoretical path losses data are computed according to both UE’ GPS positions and BSs’ GPS positions. One of the theoretical path loss models between BS and UE is defined in 3GPP document in [64]. The theoretical path loss model in [64] is adopted in our solution. • Statistical analysis: A statistical analysis is then performed using moments (e.g., Mean Variance Skewness Kurtosis (MVSK)), quartile (e.g., BOX), and probability distributions difference (e.g., Xxxxxxxxxxx Distance (WD)) methods to extract the statistical characteristics of actual and theoretical path losses data. To obtain the metrics of path loss, we consider the number of data transmissions is O in a time duration t. The corresponding actual path loss set 𝐿𝑖𝑣 (𝑡) is expressed as: {𝐿1 (𝑡), … , 𝐿𝑜 (𝑡), … , 𝐿𝑂 (𝑡)} 𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑣 where 𝐿𝑜 (𝑡) donates the 𝑜𝑡ℎ path loss in t between BS 𝑖 and UE 𝑣. Similarly, the theoretical path loss set is defined as: {𝐿̅1 (𝑡), … , 𝐿̅𝑜 (𝑡), … , 𝐿̅𝑂 (𝑡)} 𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑣 where 𝐿̅𝑜 (𝑡) denotes the 𝑜𝑡ℎ path loss in t. According to the MVSK method, we have XX (𝑡) = 1 ∑𝑂 𝐿𝑜 (𝑡), 𝑖𝑣 𝑂 𝑜=1 𝑖𝑣 𝐿𝑉 (𝑡) = 1 ∑𝑂 (𝐿𝑜 (𝑡) − XX (𝑡))2, 𝑖𝑣 𝑂 𝑜=1 𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑣 3 𝐿 𝑆 𝑖𝑣 (𝑡) = 1 𝑂 𝑂 ∑ 𝑜=1 𝐿𝑜 (𝑡)− XX(𝑡) ( 𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑣 ) , 𝑖𝑣 √𝐿𝑉 (𝑡) 𝐾 1 ∑ 𝐿𝑜 (𝑡)− XX(𝑡) 𝐿𝑖𝑣 (𝑡) = 𝑂 𝑂 𝑜=1 ( 𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑣 ) , 𝑖𝑣 √𝐿𝑉 (𝑡) where XX (𝑡), 𝐿𝑉 (𝑡), 𝐿𝑆 (𝑡) and ��𝐾 (𝑡) represent, respectively, the mean, variance, skewness, 𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑣 and kurtosis values of actual path losses in time interval t. Similarly, we can obtain the theoretical ones X̅X (𝑡), 𝐿̅𝑉 (𝑡), 𝐿̅𝑆 (𝑡) and 𝐿̅𝐾 (𝑡). The details on BOX and WD metrics can be found at [65]. 𝑖𝑣 𝑖𝑣 • MLP prediction: The statistical...
Solutions descriptions and advancements. To fill the aforementioned gaps, we leverage the potential of DL to build three solutions for tackling the stealthy DDoS attacks in a 5G environment, considering two settings (i.e., network slicing and multi- domain/multi-tenancy) and performing malicious behaviour detection either by using data collected from network layer (i.e., characteristics of network flows) or application layer (i.e., resource usage and service performance metrics).
Solutions descriptions and advancements. To date, there have been very few empirically published accounts of an effective GPS spoofing detection approach that accommodates resource, cost, and environmental constraints. For this purpose, we propose a new solution to devise an effective cellular-enabled UE GPS spoofing detection system, where MLP is used to analyse the statistical features of path losses between UE and Base Stations (BSs). The proposed approach consists of three processes, namely data sampling, statistical analysis, and MLP prediction. x Data sampling: There are two kinds of data that need to be collected in the processing, namely the actual path losses data and the theoretical path losses data. The actual path losses data are the observations of base stations, and the corresponding theoretical path losses data are ĐŽŵƉƵƚĞĚ ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐ ƚŽ ďŽƚŚ h ͛ 'W^ ƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ path loss models between BS and UE is defined in 3GPP document in [64]. The theoretical path loss model in [64] is adopted in our solution. x Statistical analysis: A statistical analysis is then performed using moments (e.g., Mean Variance Skewness Kurtosis (MVSK)), quartile (e.g., BOX), and probability distributions difference (e.g., Xxxxxxxxxxx Distance (WD)) methods to extract the statistical characteristics of actual and theoretical path losses data. To obtain the metrics of path loss, we consider the number of data transmissions is O in a time duration t. The corresponding actual path loss set ܮ௜௩ሺݐሻis expressed as: ൛ܮଵሺݐሻǡǥǡܮ௢ሺݐሻǡǥǡܮைሺݐሻൟ ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ where ܮ௢ሺݐሻdonates the ݋௧௛path loss in t between BS ݅and UE ݒ. Similarly, the theoretical path loss set is defined as: ൛ܮതଵ ሺݐሻǡǥǡܮത௢ሺݐሻǡǥǡܮതைሺݐሻൟ ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ where ܮത௢ሺݐሻdenotes the ݋௧௛path loss in t. According to the MVSK method, we have ܮெሺݐሻ= ଵσை ܮ௢ሺݐሻ, ௜௩ ை ௢ୀଵ ௜௩ ܮ௏ሺݐሻ= ଵσை ሺܮ௢ሺݐሻെ ܮெሺݐሻଶ, ௜௩ ை ௢ୀଵ ௜௩ ௜௩ ଷ ௌ ଵ ௅೚ሺ௧ሻି ௅ಾሺ௧ሻ ܮ ሺݐሻ= σை ቌ ೔ೡ ೔ೡ ቍ , ௜௩ ை ௄ ଵ ௢ୀଵ ೔ೡ ට௅ೇሺ௧ሻ ସ ௅೚ሺ௧ሻି ௅ಾሺ௧ሻ ܮ ሺݐሻ= σை ቌ ೔ೡ ೔ೡ ቍ , ௜௩ ை ௢ୀଵ ೔ೡ ට௅ೇሺ௧ሻ where ܮெሺݐሻǡܮ௏ሺݐሻǡܮௌሺݐሻand ܮ௄ሺݐሻrepresent, respectively, the mean, variance, skewness, ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ and kurtosis values of actual path losses in time interval t. Similarly, we can obtain the theoretical ones ܮതெሺݐሻǡܮത௏ሺݐሻǡܮതௌሺݐሻand ܮത௄ሺݐሻ. The details on BOX and WD metrics can be found at [65]. ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ ௜௩ x MLP prediction: The statistical properties are used as inputs to the devised MLP models (See Figure 17). The input οܮ௫೘ denotes the ݉௧௛difference of path losses reported by BS ݅under each of the statistical methods (i.e., MVSK, BOX, WD). ݉௫אሼܯǡܸǡ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Solutions descriptions and advancements

  • Modifications and Add-ons Subject to the licensing of the required development rights under separate agreement, Provider shall be entitled to develop Modifications and Add-ons for the Software and shall be permitted to Use Modifications and Add- Ons with the Software in accordance with the license grant to the Software set forth in Section 3.1 herein. Provider shall promptly notify SAP if and when Provider is planning to develop Modifications or Add-ons to the Software. The notification provided by Provider shall include a high level description of the intended functionality and of the timeframe planned for such development. In addition, any Modifications or Add-ons must not i) unreasonably impair, degrade or reduce the performance or security of the Software; ii) enable the bypassing or circumventing of SAP license restrictions and/or provide users with access to the Software to which such users are not directly licensed; and/or iii) permit mass data or metadata extraction from an SAP software to a non-SAP software for the purpose of replacing the Software as the data’s system of record. With regards to the aforementioned item iii), Provider shall refer any Customer requiring such information to SAP.

  • Captions and References The captions and headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only, and shall not be used to interpret, define, or limit its provisions. All references in this Agreement to sections (whether spelled out or using the § symbol), subsections, exhibits or other attachments, are references to sections, subsections, exhibits or other attachments contained herein or incorporated as a part hereof, unless otherwise noted.

  • Modifications and Rectifications to Coverage 1. A Party may make rectifications of a purely formal nature to its coverage under this Chapter, or minor amendments to its Schedules in Annex XVI, provided that it notifies the other Parties in writing and no Party objects in writing within 45 days from the receipt of the notification. A Party that makes such a rectification or minor amendment need not provide compensatory adjustments to the other Parties.

  • Exclusions and Limitations of Liability TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED UNDER APPLICABLE LAW, (a) NONE OF THE 8x8 PARTIES SHALL BE LIABLE UNDER THE AGREEMENT FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR COVER DAMAGES; LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUES, OR GOODWILL; OR LOSS OR INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS, WHETHER FROM BREACH OR REPUDIATION OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR OTHERWISE AND (b) THE MAXIMUM LIABILITY OF THE 8x8 PARTIES UNDER THE AGREEMENT, WHETHER ARISING FROM A THEORY OR CLAIM OF BREACH OR REPUDIATION OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF WARRANTY, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, STATUTORY DUTY, OR OTHERWISE, SHALL IN NO CASE EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF SERVICE FEES PAYABLE UNDER THE AGREEMENT FOR THE TWELVE- (12-) MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THE FIRST INCIDENT OUT OF WHICH THE LIABILITY AROSE. THE FOREGOING EXCLUSION AND LIMITATION SHALL APPLY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER EITHER PARTY WAS ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES OR THE FAILURE OF THE ESSENTIAL PURPOSE OF ANY LIMITED REMEDY, AND ON A CUMULATIVE (RATHER THAN PER-INCIDENT) BASIS. CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT THE PRICING AND OTHER TERMS UNDER THE AGREEMENT ARE BASED ON THE FOREGOING EXCLUSION AND LIMITATION.

  • Limitation of Vendor Indemnification and Similar Clauses This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, is prohibited from indemnifying third-parties (pursuant to the Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution) except as otherwise specifically provided for by law or as ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution states that "no debt shall be created by or on behalf of the State … " and the Texas Attorney General has opined that a contractually imposed obligation of indemnity creates a "debt" in the constitutional sense. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. MW-475 (1982). Thus, contract clauses which require TIPS to indemnify Vendor, pay liquidated damages, pay attorney's fees, waive Vendor's liability, or waive any applicable statute of limitations must be deleted or qualified with ''to the extent permitted by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas." Does Vendor agree? Yes, I Agree Alternative Dispute Resolution Limitations This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, does not agree to binding arbitration as a remedy to dispute and no such provision shall be permitted in this Agreement with TIPS. Vendor agrees that any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, except those specifically and expressly waived or negotiated within this Agreement, may be subject to non-binding mediation at the request of either party to be conducted by a mutually agreed upon mediator as prerequisite to the filing of any lawsuit arising out of or related to this Agreement. Mediation shall be held in either Camp or Titus County, Texas. Agreements reached in mediation will be subject to the approval by the Region 8 ESC's Board of Directors, authorized signature of the Parties if approved by the Board of Directors, and, once approved by the Board of Directors and properly signed, shall thereafter be enforceable as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees No Waiver of TIPS Immunity This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign or government immunity; nor constitute or be construed as a waiver of any of the privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department. The failure to enforce, or any delay in the enforcement, of any privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department under this Agreement or under applicable law shall not constitute a waiver of such privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities or be considered as a basis for estoppel. 5 Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees Payment Terms and Funding Out Clause This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that TIPS and TIPS Members shall not be liable for interest or late-payment fees on past-due balances at a rate higher than permitted by the laws or regulations of the jurisdiction of the TIPS Member. Funding-Out Clause: Vendor agrees to abide by the applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to Texas Local Government Code § 271.903, or any other statutory or regulatory limitation of the jurisdiction of any TIPS Member, which requires that contracts approved by TIPS or a TIPS Member are subject to the budgeting and appropriation of currently available funds by the entity or its governing body. 2

  • GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SECTOR SPECIFIC ALLOWANCES, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant: Where the company does work which falls under the following headings, the company agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Certifications and Licenses CONTRACTOR shall be certified by the California Department of Education (hereinafter referred to as “CDE”) as an NPS/A. All NPS/A services shall be provided consistent with the area of certification and licensure specified by CDE Certification and as defined in California Education Code, section 56366 et seq and within the professional scope of practice of each provider’s license, certification and/or credential. A current copy of CONTRACTOR’s NPS/A certification or a waiver of such certification issued by the CDE pursuant to Education Code section 56366.2 must be provided to LEA on or before the date this Agreement is executed by CONTRACTOR. This Master Contract shall be null and void if such certification or waiver is expired, revoked, rescinded, or otherwise nullified during the effective period of this Master Contract. Total student enrollment shall be limited to capacity as stated on CDE certification. and to capacity as stated in Section 24 of the Master Contract. In addition to meeting the certification requirements of the State of California, a CONTRACTOR that operates a program outside of this State shall be certified and all staff persons providing services to pupils shall be certified and/or licensed by that state to provide, respectively, special education and related services and designated instruction and related services to pupils under the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. Sec. 1400 et seq.). If CONTRACTOR is a licensed children’s institution (hereinafter referred to as “LCI”), CONTRACTOR shall be licensed by the state, or other public agency having delegated authority by contract with the state to license, to provide nonmedical care to children, including, but not limited to, individuals with exceptional needs. The LCI must also comply with all licensing requirements relevant to the protection of the child, and have a special permit, if necessary, to meet the needs of each child so placed. If the CONTRACTOR operates a program outside of this State, CONTRACTOR must obtain all required licenses from the appropriate licensing agency in both California and in the state where the LCI is located. With respect to CONTRACTOR’s certification, failure to notify the LEA and CDE in writing of any changes in: (1) credentialed/licensed staff; (2) ownership; (3) management and/or control of the agency; (4) major modification or relocation of facilities; or (5) significant modification of the program may result in the suspension or revocation of CDE certification and/or suspension or termination of this Master Contract by the LEA.

  • Exclusions and Reservations A. Nothing in this Article will be construed as authorizing Company to conduct any business on the Premises, Common Use Areas, or Airport separate and apart from the conduct of its permitted uses as authorized in this Agreement.

  • Limitations on Our Liability We try to ensure that you can always use your card. Occasionally, however, you may not be able to do so because of systems or communication problems involving a merchant, the network or us. We may also block use of your card or a particular type of transaction for any reason and without telling you, including in cases where we suspect unauthorized or fraudulent use of the card. Under no circumstances are we liable to you if you cannot use your card.

  • Limitation of Vendor Indemnification and Similar Clauses This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, is prohibited from indemnifying third-parties (pursuant to the Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution) except as otherwise specifically provided for by law or as ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction. Article 3, Section 52 of the Texas Constitution states that "no debt shall be created by or on behalf of the State … " and the Texas Attorney General has opined that a contractually imposed obligation of indemnity creates a "debt" in the constitutional sense. Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. No. MW-475 (1982). Thus, contract clauses which require TIPS to indemnify Vendor, pay liquidated damages, pay attorney's fees, waive Vendor's liability, or waive any applicable statute of limitations must be deleted or qualified with ''to the extent permitted by the Constitution and Laws of the State of Texas." Does Vendor agree? Yes, I Agree (Yes) Alternative Dispute Resolution Limitations This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. TIPS, a department of Region 8 Education Service Center, a political subdivision, and local government entity of the State of Texas, does not agree to binding arbitration as a remedy to dispute and no such provision shall be permitted in this Agreement with TIPS. Vendor agrees that any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement, except those specifically and expressly waived or negotiated within this Agreement, may be subject to non-binding mediation at the request of either party to be conducted by a mutually agreed upon mediator as prerequisite to the filing of any lawsuit arising out of or related to this Agreement. Mediation shall be held in either Camp or Titus County, Texas. Agreements reached in mediation will be subject to the approval by the Region 8 ESC's Board of Directors, authorized signature of the Parties if approved by the Board of Directors, and, once approved by the Board of Directors and properly signed, shall thereafter be enforceable as provided by the laws of the State of Texas. Does Vendor agree? Yes Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees (Yes) No Waiver of TIPS Immunity This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Vendor agrees that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign or government immunity; nor constitute or be construed as a waiver of any of the privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department. The failure to enforce, or any delay in the enforcement, of any privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities available to Region 8 Education Service Center or its TIPS Department under this Agreement or under applicable law shall not constitute a waiver of such privileges, rights, defenses, remedies, or immunities or be considered as a basis for estoppel. 5 Does Vendor agree? Yes, Vendor agrees (Yes)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!