Statute of limitations on Paternity Suits Sample Clauses

Statute of limitations on Paternity Suits. U.S. Sup. Ct. has decided that the period of limitations must be long enough to give the child or his representative a reasonable opportunity to assert the claim, and that the period of limitations must be substantially related to the state=s interest in preventing the assertion of stale and fraudulent claims.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Statute of limitations on Paternity Suits

  • Statute of Limitations The parties agree that all applicable statutes of limitation and time-based defenses (such as, estoppel and laches) are tolled while the procedures set forth in Subsections 9.2.(a) and 9.2(b) are pending. The parties shall take any actions necessary to effectuate this result.

  • Statute of Limitation Except for claim(s) as to ownership or title to intellectual property rights, breach of the protections for Confidential Information, the right of SAP to bring suit for payments due hereunder, or a party’s failure to provide the indemnity obligations herein and its subject matter, either party must initiate a cause of action for any claim(s) relating to the Agreement and its subject matter within 1 year from the date when the party knew, or should have known after reasonable investigation, of the facts giving rise to the claim(s).

  • Tolling of Statute of Limitations Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a(c)(1), a civil money penalty (“CMP”) must be imposed within six years from the date of the occurrence of the violation. To ensure that this six-year period does not expire during the term of this Agreement, CHCS agrees that the time between the Effective Date of this Agreement and the date the Agreement may be terminated by reason of CHCS’s breach, plus one-year thereafter, will not be included in calculating the six (6) year statute of limitations applicable to the violations which are the subject of this Agreement. CHCS waives and will not plead any statute of limitations, laches, or similar defenses to any administrative action relating to the Covered Conduct identified in paragraph I.2 that is filed by HHS within the time period set forth above, except to the extent that such defenses would have been available had an administrative action been filed on the Effective Date of this Agreement.

  • LIMITATION OF OUR LIABILITY We are not responsible or liable to you or any supplementary cardmember for: • any delay or failure by a merchant to accept the card, • goods and services you charge to your account, including any dispute with a merchant about goods and services charged to your account, • any costs, damages or expenses arising out of our failure to carry out our obligations under this agreement if that failure is caused by a third party or because of a systems failure, data processing failure, industrial dispute or other action outside our control, and • loss of profits or any incidental, indirect, consequential, punitive or special damages regardless of how they arise. For example, we will not be liable to you or any supplementary cardmember for any malfunction or failure of the card or refusal by a merchant to accept the card. QUEBEC DISCLOSURES The following section is only applicable to residents of Quebec Clause required under the Consumer Protection Act. (Open credit contract for the use of a credit card)

  • Limitations on Our Liability We try to ensure that you can always use your card. Occasionally, however, you may not be able to do so because of systems or communication problems involving a merchant, the network or us. We may also block use of your card or a particular type of transaction for any reason and without telling you, including in cases where we suspect unauthorized or fraudulent use of the card. Under no circumstances are we liable to you if you cannot use your card.

  • Scope of Limitations and Exclusions The limitation and exclusion in this Section 8 shall not apply: (i) to the extent that liability cannot be limited or excluded according to Applicable Law; (ii) in cases of willful misconduct and gross negligence; (iii) in cases of bodily injuries or death caused by our negligence; and (iv) in cases of fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation. In cases of gross negligence, liability is limited to the amount of foreseeable loss that would have been prevented through the exercise of due care.

  • LIMITATION OF RELIEF Where this Convention provides (with or without other conditions) that income from sources in a Contracting State shall be exempt from tax, or taxed at a reduced rate in that Contracting State and under the laws in force in the other Contracting State the said income is subject to tax by reference to the amount thereof which is remitted to or received in that other Contracting State and not by reference to the full amount thereof, then the exemption or reduction of tax to be allowed under this Convention in the first-mentioned Contracting State shall apply to so much of the income as is remitted to or received in that other Contracting State.

  • Notification of Limitations on Contributions San Francisco Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code (the “Conduct Code”) Section 1.126 prohibits any person who contracts with the City for selling or leasing any land or building to or from the City whenever such transaction would require the approval by a City elective officer or the board on which that City elective officer serves, from making a contribution to such an officer, or candidate for such an office, or committee controlled by such officer or candidate at any time from the commencement of negotiations for such contract until the termination of negotiations for such contract or three months has elapsed from the date the contract is approved by the City elective officer, or the board on which that City elective officer serves. San Francisco Ethics Commission Regulation 1.126-1 provides that negotiations are commenced when a prospective contractor first communicates with a City officer or employee about the possibility of obtaining a specific contract. This communication may occur in person, by telephone or in writing, and may be initiated by the prospective contractor or a City officer or employee. Negotiations are completed when a contract is finalized and signed by the City and the contractor. Negotiations are terminated when the City and/or the prospective contractor end the negotiation process before a final decision is made to award the contract. Through its execution of this Agreement, Tenant acknowledges that it is familiar with the provisions of Article III, Chapter 2 of City's Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, and sections 87100 et seq and sections 1090 et seq. of the Government Code of the State of California, and certifies that it does not know of any facts which constitute a violation of said provisions and agrees that if it becomes aware of any such fact during the term of this Agreement it shall immediately notify City.

  • 3A No Limitation of Liability The requirements contained herein as to the types and limits of all insurance to be maintained by the Interconnected Entities are not intended to and shall not in any manner, limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations assumed by the Interconnection Parties under the Interconnection Service Agreement.

  • Restrictions on claims by Train Operator Any claim by the Train Operator against Network Rail for indemnity for Relevant Losses:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.