The State. 2.1.1 The State shall designate a Project Manager for the Project. The Project Manager is authorized to act on behalf of the State to perform specific responsibilities under the Agreement.
The State. A. The State will:
The State. 1. The State will: • Make payment as set forth in section A. 4 from federal Section 105 Air Pollution Control funding for services set forth in section A.3.I.1. of this Agreement. • Provide technical assistance as requested and investigate referrals from the Sub-Recipient on State facilities and street sanding operations; • Attend meetings of the Air Quality Board and serve as an ex-officio member to the Board; and • Conduct audits of the Sub-Recipient. Tracking of the Program performance may include an audit of the Program office records or review of Program activities during the Air Quality Board meetings. An on-site audit may be conducted if problems are found during review of payment request information, following review of the end of Agreement report or if issues are found during an Air Quality Board meeting.
The State. The State shall be responsible to administer the CSFP and determine eligibility of and compliance by the Charter School to the requirements of the CSFP.
The State a. The State represents and warrants to the Fiscal Agent that:
The State. (1) acknowledges that this Agreement places obligations on the Licensee relating to its performance under this Agreement; and
The State. Regarding the state’s activity in the economic field there are mainly two principles that will be treated more in depth later on. The first is the subsidiarity principle, which affirms that the state should not interfere when private actors are exerting their economic freedom within a legal framework. According to this principle public 24 Compendium, 349. institutions should be a subsidium, namely a helping hand when private institutions or individuals are not able to satisfy their necessities alone. Second, there is what social teaching calls the solidarity principle. The state has to intervene directly, according to social thought’s solidarity principle, when public institutions have to protect the weakest economic actors, preventing situations such as private monopolies or oligarchies. To be efficient, these principles need to be applied with a certain balance. If the state were to leave full autonomy to private subjects, in a lax application of the principle of subsidiarity, a sort of local egoism could be implemented. There is the risk that private actors without any institutional regulations will try to dominate public institutions and forget the end of the common good. While, on the other side, a too intense application of the solidarity principle can easily degenerate into a state focused too much on public assistance. Namely a state in which services and goods that could be easily and better offered by private agents are monopolized by state’s activity. The state, in other words, should act respectfully of private interests with, at the same time, a vigilant consideration about the economic destiny of all the actors involved, particularly the disadvantaged ones. In this regard, the Compendium proposes a difficult balance between, on one side, encouraging private initiatives through institutional structures and, on the other side, an effective, balanced and rational intervention directed to the always present end of the general well-being of people.25 Keeping in mind the inter-connected activity of these two principles, we have now to say that the state’s role, according to social thought, is also accomplished when it simply furnishes those determinant guarantees, as stability in monetary exchange and efficient public services, without which it would be impossible even to think of an economic environment. More concretely, according to social thought, the state’s role in the economic field: […] is that of determining an appropriate juridical framewo...
The State. The State shall be responsible to administer the CSFP and determine eligibility of and compliance by the Charter School to the requirements of the CSFP. The School District shall have no duty or obligation to administer, monitor or enforce any requirements imposed upon the Charter School under the CSFP.
The State and the Consultant agree that any electronic files prepared by either party shall conform to the specifications listed in Attachment B. Any change to these specifications by either the State or the Consultant is subject to review and acceptance by the other party. Additional efforts by the Consultant made necessary by a change to the CADD software specifications shall be compensated for as Additional Services.
The State. The State may terminate this Agreement prior to the Expiry Date only upon an event of default by LEP specified in Section 11.1.b, but only after compliance with the
