Common use of Stay of Litigation Clause in Contracts

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, upon the signing of this Agreement and pursuant to CCP section 583.330, to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] Dated: November 8 , 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx Datxx: Xoxxxxxx 8 , 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintifx Xxxxx: November , 0000 XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November , 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF DOCUMENT Dated: November , 2022 Dated: November_, 2022 Dated: November __2__, 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxx, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, L.P. (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV30747) The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx action lawsuit (“Action”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxx. Xxx Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California (“Class Members”) during the Class Period (August 19, 2017 to November 30, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California during the PAGA Period (August 18, 2020 to November 30, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according to Defendant’s records. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods during either period than Defendant’s records show, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”). See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Defendant. If you worked for Defendant during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few options as shown in the Chart below:

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, agree that upon the signing of this Agreement and that pursuant to CCP section 583.330, 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] DocuSign Envelope ID: 193DE0F1-13B6-4DA5-ACAD-48B0A33FE0ED Plaintiffs Dated: November 8 _Ja_n_u_a_r_y_9_,_2_0_2_3_______ ___________________________________ PAGA Representative, 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVEXXXXXXX XXXXX Dated: Xxxxx ___________________ ___________________________________ Class Representative, XXXXX XXXXXX Defendant Dated: ___________________ ___________________________________ XXXXX OF PENNSYLVANIA LLC DocuSign Envelope ID: 4E3C72A7-6E6F-4509-A73E-ADCC50558CCB Plaintiffs Dated: ___________________ ___________________________________ PAGA Representative, XXXXXXX XXXXX Dated: _Ja_n_u_a_r_y_1_0_,_2_0_2_3______ ___________________________________ Class Representative, XXXXX XXXXXX Defendant Dated: ___________________ ___________________________________ XXXXX OF PENNSYLVANIA LLC APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dated: January 10, 2023 XXXXXXXX & XXXXXXXX, APC By: Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Datxx: Xoxxxxxx 8 , 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintifx Xxxxx: November Plaintiff, 0000 XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November , 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF DOCUMENT Dated: November , 2022 Dated: November_, 2022 Dated: November __2__, 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” the Proposed Class and the Aggrieved Employees EXHIBIT A COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL XxxxxxXXXXXXX XXXXX, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxan individual, L.P. (Los Angeles Superior Courton behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general; XXXXX XXXXXX, an individual, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, x. XXXXX OF PENNSYLVANIA LLC; and DOES 1 thru 50, inclusive, Defendants, Case No. 20STCV30747) XX0000000 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx employee class action lawsuit (“Action”“Action”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. XXXXX OF PENNSYLVANIA LLC (“Defendant” “Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”“XXXXX” is used herein as a placeholder) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxxwage and hour violations. Xxx The Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee XXXXX employees, XXXXXXX XXXXX (“Plaintiff”“PAGA Representative”) and seeks XXXXX XXXXXX (“Class Representative”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and seek payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest back wages and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California (“Class Members”) during the Class Period (August 19, 2017 to November 30, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California during the PAGA Period (August 18, 2020 to November 30, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according to Defendant’s records. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods during either period than Defendant’s records show, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”). See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Defendant. If you worked for Defendant during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few options as shown in the Chart belowother relief for:

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, agree that upon the signing of this Agreement and that pursuant to CCP section 583.330, 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] 12/7/2022 Dated: November 8 December , 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE2022 By: Xxxx Xxxxxx-Xxxx Dated: December , 2022 By: Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx DatxxDated: Xoxxxxxx 8 December , 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXXBy: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Dated: December , 2022 By: Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Dated: December , 2022 By: Name: Xxxx Xxxxxx Title: CEO Defendant Me Gusta Gourmet Foods, Inc. Dated: December 6, 2022 XXXXXXX LAW GROUP, APC Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintifx Xxxxx: November Plaintiffs XXXX XXXXXX-XXXX, 0000 XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx SrXXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, and XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX, as individuals and on behalf of all employees similarly situated. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November December 6, 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSONBOKHOUR LAW GROUP, P.C. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs XXXX XXXXXX-XXXX, XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, and XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX, as individuals and on behalf of all employees similarly situated. Dated: December 6, 2022 XXXXXX EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, APC Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant END OF DOCUMENT Plaintiff ME GUSTA GOURMET FOODS, INC. Dated: November December 6, 2022 XXXXXXX LAW GROUP, APC Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Xxxx X. Xxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs XXXX XXXXXX-XXXX, XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, and XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX, as individuals and on behalf of all employees similarly situated. Dated: November_December 6, 2022 BOKHOUR LAW GROUP, P.C. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs XXXX XXXXXX-XXXX, XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX, and XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXX, as individuals and on behalf of all employees similarly situated. Dated: November __2__December 6, 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX2022 XXXXXX EMPLOYMENT LAW GROUP, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. APC Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” Plaintiff ME GUSTA GOURMET FOODS, INC. EXHIBIT A COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxx-Xxxx v. Me Gusta Gourmet Foods, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, L.P. (Inc. Los Angeles Superior Court, Court Case No. 20STCV30747) Number: 21STCV19578 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx action lawsuit (“Action”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxx. Xxx Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California (“Class Members”) during the Class Period (August 19, 2017 to November 30, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California during the PAGA Period (August 18, 2020 to November 30, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according to Defendant’s records. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods during either period than Defendant’s records show, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”). See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Defendant. If you worked for Defendant during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few options as shown in the Chart below:

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, agree that upon the signing of this Agreement and that pursuant to CCP section 583.330, 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] Dated: November 8 February , 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND 2023 PLAINTIFF XXXXXX XXXXX Dated: February , 2023 PLAINTIFF XXXX XXXXX XXXXX Dated: February , 2023 PLAINTIFF XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX Dated: February , 2023 PLAINTIFF XXXXXXX XXXXX Dated: February , 2023 CLASS REPRESENTATIVECOUNSEL XXXXX, XXXXXX & XXXXX LLP XXXXX X. XXXXXX XXXXX X. XXXXX Dated: Xxxxx Xxxxxx DatxxFebruary , 2023 CLASS COUNSEL: Xoxxxxxx 8 MOON & XXXX, 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXXAPC Dated: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY February , 2023 CLASS COUNSEL: XXXX & XXXXXXXXXX, LLP Xxxxx XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintifx XxxxxXXXXXXXXX Dated: November February , 0000 XXXXXXXXX2023 CLASS COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX LLP XXXXXXX X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX Dated: November February , 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX2023 DEFENDANTS: LITTLER MENDELSONTHE PROCTER & XXXXXX DISTRIBUTING LLC By: _ _ Title: Dated: February , 2023 DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL: XXXXXXX XXXXX P.C. Xxxxxx XXXXX X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant XXXXXX XXXX XXX END OF DOCUMENT Dated: November February , 2022 2023 CLASS COUNSEL: XXXX & XXXXXXXXXX, LLP XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXXX Dated: November_March 1, 2022 2023 CLASS COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXX LLP XXXXXXX X. XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX Dated: November __2__February , 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE2023 DEFENDANTS: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX XXXXXXXTHE PROCTER & XXXXXX DISTRIBUTING LLC By: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXX_ Title: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx February , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX2023 DEFENDANT’S COUNSEL: LITTLER MENDELSON, XXXXXXX XXXXX P.C. Xxxxxx XXXXX X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant XXXXXX XXXX XXX END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxx, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, L.P. (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV30747) The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx action lawsuit (“Action”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxx. Xxx Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California (“Class Members”) during the Class Period (August 19, 2017 to November 30, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California during the PAGA Period (August 18, 2020 to November 30, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according to Defendant’s records. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods during either period than Defendant’s records show, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”). See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Defendant. If you worked for Defendant during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few options as shown in the Chart below:DOCUMENT

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, agree that upon the signing of this Agreement and that pursuant to CCP Code of Civil Procedure section 583.330, 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures // // // // // // // // // // Datxx: Xxril , 2024 MATERN LAW GROUP, PC By: Xxxxxxx X. Xaxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Attorxxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX, individually, and on following page] Dated: November 8 , 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVEbehalf of others similarly situated Datxx: Xxxxx Xxxxxx Datxx, 2024 XXXXXX XXXXX, LLP By: Xoxxxxxx 8 Xxxx X. Xxxxxxld XXXXXXX, 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY XXXXXXX & YOUNG, LLP Xxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintifx Xxxxx: November Xxxxxxx, 0000 XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx SrXx. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November , 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF DOCUMENT EL POLLO INKA EXPRESS, INC. PLAINTIFF Dated: November , 2022 Dated: NovemberApril _, 2022 Dated: November __2__, 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE0000 Xxxxxxxxx XXXMUNDO IBARRA GARIBAY DEFENDANT EL POLLO INKA EXPRESS, INC. Dated: April ___, 2024 Name: Title: By: Xxxxxxx X. Xxtxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Attorxxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated Dated: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX 00 , 2024 XXXXXX XXXXX, LLP By: Xxxx X. Xxxxxxld XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY , XXXXXXX & YOUNG, LLP Xxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXXXxxxxxx, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx SrXx. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” EL POLLO INKA EXPRESS, INC. PLAINTIFF Dated: April ___, 0000 Xxxxxxxxx XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX DEFENDANT EL POLLO INKA EXPRESS, INC. Dated: April ___, 2024 Name: Title: EXHIBIT A COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX AND HEARING DATE FOR FIXXX XXXXX COURT APPROVAL XxxxxxXXXXXXXX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx v. El Pollo Inka Express, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & XxxInc. (Filed: Aug. 19, L.P. (2021) Los Angeles County Superior Court, Court Case No. 20STCV30747) 21STCV30677 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx employee class action lawsuit (“Action”“Action”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”) EL POLLO INKA for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxxwage and hour violations. Xxx The Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee EL XXXXX XXXX xxxxxxxx XXXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX (“Plaintiff”“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California (“Class Members”) during the Class Period (August 19, 2017 to November 30, 2022); and (2) penalties for claims under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) Labor Code and who worked in California during the PAGA Period (August 18, 2020 to November 30, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main partsBusiness and Professions Code for: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Meal Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according to Defendant’s records. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods during either period than Defendant’s records show, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”). See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Defendant. If you worked for Defendant during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few options as shown in the Chart below:Violations;

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon Upon the execution Court’s entry of this Agreement the litigation Preliminary Approval Order, all proceedings in the Action shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, upon the signing of this Agreement and pursuant to CCP section 583.330, to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] SO AGREED: Approved As To Form And Content By Counsel: Dated: November 8 May 8, 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE2023 By: Xxxx X. Xxxxx XXXXXX & GOLDEN LLP Xxxx X. Xxxxx Xxxx X. Xxxxxx 000 0xx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxx Xxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 Dated: May 8, 2023 By: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx XXXXX CABRASER XXXXXXX & XXXXXXXXX, XXX Xxxxx X. Dermody Xxxx X. Xxxxxx Datxx000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000-0000 Telephone: Xoxxxxxx 8 (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 Class Counsel and Counsel for Settlement Class Representatives Dated: May 8, 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXX2023 By: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx. XXXXXXXX & XXXXXXXX LLP Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxx-Xxxxxxxxx Ostrager Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X. Xxxx (admitted pro hac vice) 0000 Xxx Xxxx Xxxxxx, X.X., Xxxxx 000 Xxxxxxxxxx, X.X. 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 Dated: May 8, 2023 By: _ Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx XXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXX & XXXXXXXXX LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintifx Xxxxx(admitted pro hac vice) 0000 Xxxxx Xxxx Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: November , (000) 000-0000 XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx (admitted pro hac vice) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel DatedXxxxxxx (admitted pro hac vice) 000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: November , 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx (000) 000-0000 Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END 00 Xxxx 00xx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Exhibit 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF DOCUMENT Dated: November NEW YORK Xxxx-Xxxxx, 2022 Dated: November_et xx. x. Goldman, 2022 Dated: November __2__Xxxxx & Co., 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXXet al., L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx SrNo. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” COURT 1:10-cv-06950-AT-RWL COURT-APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX COURT AND FINAL APPROVAL XxxxxxHEARING This is a court-authorized notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. On [date], et. al. v. 2023, the Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, L.P. (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV30747) The Superior Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx of the United States District Court for the State Southern District of California authorized New York granted preliminary approval of a proposed settlement set forth in the Parties’ Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (“Settlement” or “Settlement Agreement”) concerning this Noticegender discrimination class action lawsuit brought against Xxxxxxx Xxxxx. Read it carefully! It’s • This Notice is not junk mailan expression of any opinion by the Court as to the merits of any of the claims or defenses asserted by either side in this litigation. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx denies the claims and material allegations in the lawsuit. The sole purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the proposed Settlement and your right to remain in or exclude yourself from it, spamso that you can make an informed decision. • The proposed Settlement provides $215,000,000 to compensate individuals, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyerand provides for adjustments to Xxxxxxx Xxxxx’x business practices that address the claims in this litigation. You are not being sued. You may be Individuals eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx action lawsuit the Settlement (“Action”“Settlement Class Members”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxx. Xxx Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, are persons who are not represented by in one or both of the two groups described below: o Evaluation Processes Group: All women who held a revenue-producing Associate or Vice President position at Xxxxxxx Xxxxx in the Investment Banking, Investment Management, or Securities Divisions, or any union (i.e.of their sucessor groupings, non-union employees) in New York at any time from July 7, 2002 to March 28, 2023 or elsewhere in the United States at any time from September 10, 2004 through March 28, 2023, and who worked in California (“Class Members”a) during were subject to Xxxxxxx Xxxxx’x performance review process, known as the Class Period 360 Review, or (August 19b) were subject to Xxxxxxx Xxxxx’x comparative performance ranking process, 2017 to November 30, 2022)known as Manager Quartiling; and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California during the PAGA Period (August 18, 2020 to November 30, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according to Defendant’s records. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods during either period than Defendant’s records show, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”). See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Defendant. If you worked for Defendant during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few options as shown in the Chart below:and

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, agree that upon the signing of this Agreement and that pursuant to CCP section 583.330, 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] Dated: November 8 June , 2000 XXXXXXXXF 2023 PLAINTIFFS, XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL, INC. Dated: June , 2023 Dated: June 13 , 2023 By: Its: XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX LAW GROUP, P.C. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS REPRESENTATIVEDated: Xxxxx June , 2023 XXXX XXXXXX THE XXXXXX FIRM ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS Dated: June 12, 2023 XXXX XXX L DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS Dated: June , 2023 PLAINTIFFS, XXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX Dated: June , 2023 PLAINTIFFS, XXXXXX PARRRA- XXXXXXX PRC-DESOTO INTERNATIONAL, INC. Dated: June 9 , 2023 By: Its: Xxxxxx Datxx: Xoxxxxxx 8 , 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintifx Xxxxx: November , 0000 XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel and CEO Dated: November June , 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON2023 XXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX LAW GROUP, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF DOCUMENT ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS Dated: November June , 2022 2023 XXXX XXXXXX THE XXXXXX FIRM ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS Dated: November_June , 2022 2023 XXXXX XXX DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, P.C. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS Dated: November __2__June13 , 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE: Xxxxx Xxxxxx 2023 XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT PRC-DESOTO, INTERNATIONAL COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxxx, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, L.P. (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV30747) The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx action lawsuit (“Action”) against Shambaugh & Xxx, L.P. (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxx. Xxx Action was filed by Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California (“Class Members”) during the Class Period (August 19, 2017 to November 30, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx (“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California during the PAGA Period (August 18, 2020 to November 30, 2022) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according to Defendant’s records. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods during either period than Defendant’s records show, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”). See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Defendant. If you worked for Defendant during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few options as shown in the Chart below:APPROVAL

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree, agree that upon the signing of this Agreement and that pursuant to CCP section 583.330, 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / [Signatures on following page] DatedDATED: November 8 August 16, 2000 XXXXXXXXF AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE2023 LABOR LAW PC By: Xxxxx Xxxxxx Datxx: Xoxxxxxx 8 Xxxxxxxxx, 2022 XXXXX XXXXXXX: LAUBY MANKIN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Esq. Attorneys for Plaintifx XxxxxPlaintiffs XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX DATED: November August 16, 0000 XXXXXXXXX2023 XXXXXXXXXX NORDREHAUG XXXXXXX XXXXXXX LLP By: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintiffs XXXXXXXXX & XXXXXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX DATED: August 16, L.P. 2023 BOKHOUR LAW GROUP By: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel DatedXxxxxxx Attorneys for Plaintiff XXXXX XXXXXXX DATED: November August 16, 2022 DEFENDAXX’X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON2023 XXXXXXX XXXXX, P.C. Xxxxxx By: Xxx Xxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF DOCUMENT DatedBAMIA 2, LLC PLAINTIFF XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX By: November Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Plaintiff PLAINTIFF XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX By: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Plaintiff DATED: August 16, 2022 Dated2023 DATED: November_August 16, 2022 Dated2023 DATED: November __2__August 16, 2000 XXXXXXXFF AND CLASS REPREXXXXXTIVE2023 PLAINTIFF XXXXX XXXXXXX By: Xxxxx Xxxxxx XXXXX XXXXXXXXxxxxxx Plaintiff BAMIA 2, LLC DATED: LAUBY MANKJN LAUBY LLP Xxxxx X. Xxxxxx Atxxxxxxx xor Plaintiff X--· XXXXXXXXXAugust 16, 2023 By: XXXXXXXXX & XXX, L.P. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx Sr. Vice President & General Counsel Dated: November_3 LASC CIV 296 NEW 06/22 For Optional Uxx , 0002 DEFENXXXX'X XXXXXXX: LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendant END OF D OCUMENT Exhibit “A” COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT XXX XEARING DATX XXX XXXXX AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL XxxxxxXxxx Xxxxxxx v. REEF Global, et. al. v. Xxxxxxxxx & XxxInc., L.P. (Los Angeles Superior CourtBamia 2, LLC, and Reef Technology, Inc., Case No. 20STCV30747) Number 21STCV37585 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employxx xxxxx employee class action lawsuit (“Action”“Action”) against Shambaugh & XxxBamia 2, L.P. LLC (“Defendant” or “Xxxxxxxxx”abbreviate name; “DEFENDANT” is used herein as a placeholder) for alleged xxxx xxx xxur violatixxxwage and hour violations. Xxx The Action was filed by former DEFENDANT employees Xxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxx a former Shambaugh employee Xxxxxxx (“Plaintiff”“Plaintiffs”) and seeks payment of (1) unpaid wages, statutory damages, interest back wages and attorneys’ fees ox xxxxxx of other relief for a class of non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees“Class Members”) and who worked in California (“Class Members”) for DEFENDANT during the Class Period (August 19October 28, 2017 to November 302017, 2022through February 16, 2023); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney Generax Xxx General Act (“PAGA”“PAGA”) for all non-exempt/hourly employees of Xxxxxxxxx, who are not represented by any union (i.e., non-union employees) and who worked in California for DEFENDANT during the PAGA Period (August 184, 2020 to November 302020, 2022through February 16, 2023) (“Aggrieved Employees”“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Defendant DEFENDANT to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Defendant DEFENDANT to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”“LWDA”). [CLASS MEMBER NAME] [ID/CONTROL NUMBER] Two Parts Hours Worked During Class Period (Class Member); Pay Periods Worked During PAGA Period (Aggrieved Employee) Your Estimated Share Class Member INSERT (During Class Period) $INSERT (Individual Class Payment) Aggrieved Employee INSERT (During PAGA Period) $INSERT (Individual PAGA Payment) Based on Defendant’s DEFENDANT’s records, and the Parties’ Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment are shown in the chart above, along with the hours and pay periods worked you are credited with working during the Class Period and PAGA Period, respectively, according is estimated to Defendant’s recordsbe $. The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Defendant’s DEFENDANT’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) The above estimates are based on DEFENDANT’s records showing that you worked workweeks during the Class Period and you worked workweeks during the PAGA Period. If you believe that you worked more Pay Periods workweeks during either period than Defendant’s records showperiod, you can submit a challenge by DATE, 2023 (“Response Deadline”)the deadline date. See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Defendant DEFENDANT to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against DefendantDEFENDANT. If you worked for Defendant DEFENDANT during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have a few two basic options as shown in under the Chart belowSettlement: