Common use of Stay of Litigation Clause in Contracts

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Plaintiff: Xxxxx Xxxxx 2/2/2024 Date: Defendant: Ansible Government Solutions, LLC Date: By: Title: Approved as to form only: Date: 2/2/2024 XXXX LAW FIRM Nazo Koulloukian Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXXX LAW GROUP, APC Date: 2/2/2024 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXX, XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX & XXXXXXX LLP Date: By: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Esq. Attorney for Defendant COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxx Xxxxx v. Ansible Government Solutions, LLC Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 22STCV35081 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) against Ansible Government Solutions, LLC (hereafter referred to as “Ansible”) for alleged wage and hour violations. The Action was filed by a former Ansible employee, Xxxxx Xxxxx (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) back wages, unreimbursed expenses, and penalties for a class of hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist (“Class Members”) who worked for Ansible during the Class Period (November 3, 2018 to ); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist who worked for Ansible during the PAGA Period (October 27, 2021 to ) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Ansible to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Ansible to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on Ansible’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Ansible’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) The above estimates are based on Ansible’s records showing that you worked workweeks during the Class Period and you worked pay periods during the PAGA Period. If you believe that you worked more workweeks or pay periods than the amounts stated above, you can submit a challenge by the deadline date. See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or not. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Ansible to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against Ansible. If you worked for Ansible during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have three basic options under the Settlement:

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. PlaintiffDated: _ Plaintiff Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Dated: _ Xxxxxx Xxxxx for: Defendant Northern California InAlliance Dated: _ Defendant Xxxxxx Xxxxx 2/2/2024 DateDated: Defendant: Ansible Government SolutionsCROSNER LEGAL, LLC Date: By: Title: Approved as to form only: Date: 2/2/2024 XXXX LAW FIRM Nazo Koulloukian Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXXX LAW GROUP, APC Date: 2/2/2024 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXX, XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX & XXXXXXX LLP Date: By: Xxxxxx X. XxxxxPC Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Attorney Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Esq. Xxxxx Xxxx, Esq. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Plaintiff and the Class XXXXX, XXXXXX & XXXX, LLP Dated: 2/9/2023 X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Attorneys for Defendants COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx v. Ansible Government SolutionsNorthern California InAlliance, LLC et al., Sacramento County Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los AngelesCourt, Case No. 22STCV35081 00-0000-00000000 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) against Ansible Government Solutions, LLC (hereafter referred to as “Ansible”) for alleged wage Northern California InAlliance and hour Xxxxxx Xxxxx Defendants violations. The Action was filed by a former Ansible employee, Xxxxx Xxxxx (“Plaintiff”) Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx , and seeks payment of (1) back unpaid minimum and overtime wages, unreimbursed expensesstatutory penalties, business expense es and penalties costs for a class of hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist (“Class Members”) who worked for Ansible Defendants during the Class Period (November 3January 16, 2018 to 2020, through December 20, 2022); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist who worked for Ansible Defendants during the PAGA Period (October 27January 16, 2021 to ) (“Aggrieved Employees”). 2020, through December 20, 2022 The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Ansible Defendants to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Ansible Defendants to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on Ansible’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Defendants Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Ansible’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) The above estimates are based on Ansible’s records showing that you worked Defendants workweeks during the Class Period and you worked pay periods during the PAGA Period. If you believe that you worked more workweeks or pay periods than the amounts stated aboveduring either period, you can submit a challenge by the deadline date. See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approvalapproval of the Settlement. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or notdo not act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Ansible Defendants to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against AnsibleDefendants. If you worked for Ansible Defendants during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have three two basic options under the Settlement:

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this AgreementAgreement and the ongoing cross-complaint by Bay Cities Partners, Inc. against cross-defendant ADP. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Plaintiff: Xxxxx Xxxxx 2/2/2024 Date: Defendant: Ansible Government Solutions, LLC Date: By: Title: Approved as to form only: Date: 2/2/2024 XXXX LAW FIRM Nazo Koulloukian Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXXX LAW GROUP, APC Date: 2/2/2024 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Attorney for Plaintiff XXXXXXX, XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX & XXXXXXX LLP Date: By: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Esq. Attorney for Defendant EXHIBIT “A” COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx v. Ansible Government SolutionsBay Cities Partners, LLC Superior Court of the State of CaliforniaInc., County of Los Angeleset al., Case No. 22STCV35081 20STCV40788 The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) against Ansible Government SolutionsBay Cities Partners, LLC Inc. dba Bay Cities Italian Deli (hereafter referred to abbreviate name; “BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI” is used herein as “Ansible”a placeholder) for alleged wage and hour violations. The Action was filed by a former Ansible employee, Xxxxx Xxxxx aformer BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI employee Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) back for Bay Cities Italian Deli’s failure to pay Class Members minimum and overtime wages, unreimbursed expensesfailed to provide proper meal periods and rest periods, failed to pay all wages owed during and upon termination of employment, failed to maintain required records, failed to furnish proper wage statements, and penalties failed to indemnify employees for necessary expenditures as required by applicable California laws, including California’s Unfair Competition Laws, and the California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) for a class of hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist hourlyemployees (“Class Members”) who worked for Ansible BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI during the Class Period (November 3of October 21, 2018 to )2016 through February 7, 2022; and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist who worked for Ansible BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI during the PAGA Period (of October 2721, 2021 to ) 2019 through February 7, 2022. (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) a Class Settlement requiring Ansible BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Ansible BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on AnsibleBAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ . The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to AnsibleBAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) The above estimates are based on AnsibleBAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI’s records showing that you worked workweeks during the Class Period and you worked pay periods workweeks during the PAGA Period. If you believe that you worked more workweeks or pay periods than the amounts stated aboveduring either period, you can submit a challenge by the deadline date. See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or notnot act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Ansible BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against AnsibleBAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI. If you worked for Ansible BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have three two basic options under the Settlement:: Do Nothing. You don’t have to do anything to participate in the proposed Settlement and be eligible for an Individual Class Payment and/or an Individual PAGA Payment. As a Participating Class Member, though, you will give up your right to assert Class Period wage claims and PAGA Period penalty claims against BAY CITIES ITALIAN DELI.

Stay of Litigation. The Parties agree that upon the execution of this Agreement the litigation shall be stayed, except to effectuate the terms of this Agreement. The Parties further agree that upon the signing of this Agreement that pursuant to CCP Code of Civil Procedure section 583.330 to extend the date to bring a case to trial under CCP Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310 for the entire period of this settlement process. Plaintiff: Xxxxx Xxxxx 2/2/2024 Date: Defendant: Ansible Government Solutions, LLC Date: By: Title: Approved as to form only: Date: 2/2/2024 XXXX LAW FIRM Nazo Koulloukian Attorney For Plaintiff For XYZ (date) (date) Counsel for Plaintiff XXXXXXXX LAW GROUP, APC Date: 2/2/2024 Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Attorney Counsel for Plaintiff XXXXXXX, XXXXXX, XXXXXXXX & XXXXXXX LLP Date: By: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Esq. Attorney for Defendant XYZ (date) (date) (continued on next page) COURT APPROVED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR FINAL COURT APPROVAL Xxxxx Xxxxx v. Ansible Government Solutions, LLC Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. 22STCV35081 (case date and number) The Superior Court for the State of California authorized this Notice. Read it carefully! It’s not junk mail, spam, an advertisement, advertisement or solicitation by a lawyer. You are not being sued. You may be eligible to receive money from an employee class action lawsuit (“Action”) against Ansible Government Solutions, LLC (hereafter referred to abbreviate name; “XYZ” is used herein as “Ansible”a placeholder) for alleged wage and hour violations. The Action was filed by a former Ansible employee, Xxxxx Xxxxx a[n][former] XYZ employee (“Plaintiff”) and seeks payment of (1) back wages, unreimbursed expenses, wages [and penalties other relief] for a class of hourly [e.g., hourly] employees with the job title of phlebotomist (“Class Members”) who worked for Ansible XYZ during the Class Period (November 3, 2018 ( to ); and (2) penalties under the California Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) for all hourly employees with the job title of phlebotomist who worked for Ansible during the PAGA Period (October 27, 2021 to ) (“Aggrieved Employees”). The proposed Settlement has two main parts: (1) is a Class Settlement requiring Ansible XYZ to fund Individual Class Payments, and (2) a PAGA Settlement requiring Ansible to fund Individual PAGA Payments and pay penalties to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (“LWDA”). Based on AnsibleXYZ’s records, and the Parties’ current assumptions, your Individual Class Payment is estimated to be $ (less withholding) and your Individual PAGA Payment is estimated to be $ ). The actual amount you may receive likely will be different and will depend on a number of factors. (If no amount is stated for your Individual PAGA Payment, then according to Ansible’s records you are not eligible for an Individual PAGA Payment under the Settlement because you didn’t work during the PAGA Period.) The above estimates are based on AnsibleXYZ’s records showing that you worked workweeks during the Class Period and you worked pay periods during the PAGA Period. If you believe that you worked more workweeks or pay periods than the amounts stated aboveduring this period, you can submit a challenge by the deadline date. See Section 4 of this Notice. The Court has already preliminarily approved the proposed Settlement and approved this Notice. The Court has not yet decided whether to grant final approval. Your legal rights are affected whether you act or notnot act. Read this Notice carefully. You will be deemed to have carefully read and understood it. At the Final Approval Hearing, the Court will decide whether to finally approve the Settlement and how much of the Settlement will be paid to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys (“Class Counsel”). The Court will also decide whether to enter a judgment that requires Ansible XYZ to make payments under the Settlement and requires Class Members and Aggrieved Employees to give up their rights to assert certain claims against AnsibleXYZ. If you worked for Ansible XYZ during the Class Period and/or the PAGA Period, you have three two basic options under the Settlement: