Sutro Patents Sample Clauses

Sutro Patents. As between the Parties, Sutro shall have the sole right, but not the obligation, itself or through a designee, at its cost to enforce (i.e., (x) initiating or prosecuting an infringement or other appropriate suit or action against a Third Party, and (y) defending any declaratory judgment action with respect thereto) [***].
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Sutro Patents. Sutro shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to file, prosecute and maintain Sutro Patents in Sutro’s name. Sutro shall bear all costs and expenses of filing, prosecuting and maintaining Sutro Patents. Sutro shall keep Merck informed of the status of the filing and prosecution of Sutro Patents or related proceedings (e.g. interferences, oppositions, reexaminations, reissues, revocations or nullifications) in a timely manner, and will take into consideration the advice and recommendations of Merck. At Sutro’s request, Merck will provide Sutro with reasonable assistance, at Sutro’s sole expense, in prosecuting Sutro Patents to the extent possible, including providing such data in Merck’s Control that is, in Merck’s reasonable judgment, helpful to support the prosecution of a Sutro Patent.
Sutro Patents. Subject to Sections 9.1(a)(i) and (ii) below, Sutro shall be solely responsible for the Prosecution and Maintenance (as defined below) of the Sutro Patents at its own expense.
Sutro Patents. Sutro shall have the sole right and authority, but not the obligation, to enforce Sutro Patents or Sutro Manufacturing Patents, other than Product Specific Patents, against any Third Party infringer.
Sutro Patents. SUTRO shall have the primary right, but not the obligation, to institute, prosecute, and control any action or proceeding with respect to any Competitive Infringement of any Product-Specific SUTRO Patent(s) under this Agreement, by counsel of its own choice. The foregoing right of SUTRO shall include the right to perform all actions of a reference product sponsor set forth in the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act or any ex-U.S. equivalent of the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act. CELGENE will have the right, at its own expense and by counsel of its choice, to be represented in any such action or proceeding. At SUTRO’s request, CELGENE will join any such action or proceeding as a party and will use Commercially Reasonable Efforts to cause any Third Party as necessary to join such action or proceeding as a party (all at SUTRO’s expense) if doing so is necessary for the purposes of establishing standing or is otherwise required by applicable Law to pursue such action or proceeding. SUTRO will have a period of ninety (90) days after its receipt or delivery of notice and evidence pursuant to Section 9.7.1 to elect to so enforce such Product-Specific SUTRO Patent(s) in the applicable jurisdiction (or to settle or otherwise secure the abatement of such Competitive Infringement), provided however, that such period will be more than ninety (90) days to the extent applicable Law prevents earlier enforcement of such SUTRO Patent(s) (such as the enforcement process set forth in or under the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act or any ex-U.S. equivalent of the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act) and such period will be less than ninety (90) days to the extent that a delay in bringing an action to enforce the applicable Product-Specific SUTRO Patent(s) against such alleged Third Party infringer would limit or compromise the remedies (including monetary and injunctive relief) available against such alleged Third Party infringer. In the event SUTRO does not so elect (or settle or otherwise secure the abatement of such Competitive Infringement) within the aforementioned period of time or twenty (20) days before the time limit, if any, for the filing of an action or proceeding or taking of any other action with respect to such Competitive Infringement, whichever is sooner, it will so notify CELGENE in writing and in the case where CELGENE then desires to commence a suit or take action to enforce the applicable SUTRO Patents with respect to such Competitive Infringement in the applicable jurisdiction, the Parties will confer and upon SUTRO’s pri...

Related to Sutro Patents

  • Patent Rights The State and the U. S. Department of Transportation shall have the royalty free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to use and to authorize others to use any patents developed by the Engineer under this contract.

  • Licensed Patents Licensee shall be responsible for all further patent prosecution with respect to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technologies set out in Exhibit “A”. Licensee may select the patent agent for the prosecution of the Licensed Patents, subject to the approval of Licensor as the patent owner, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Licensee shall provide Licensor with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Licensed Patents so that Licensor may be informed and apprised of and meaningfully consulted as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall keep all such documentation confidential. In the event the Licensee does not agree that any given patent application or patent should be filed, prosecuted or maintained (hereinafter referred to as a “Refused Licensed Patent”) in a particular jurisdiction(s) Licensee shall indicate such disagreement in writing (hereinafter “Refusal Notice”) and upon Licensor’s receipt of such Refusal Notice Licensor shall have the right unilaterally to make, prosecute and maintain such Refused Licensed * Confidential Information, indicated by [***], has been omitted from this filing and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission Patent in such jurisdiction(s) in the name of its owners, at Licensor’s expense, and Licensee shall not have any rights or obligations to such Refused Licensed Patent in such jurisdiction(s); provided, however, that Licensee shall retain all of its ownership rights in any Refused Licensed Patent that is a Co-Owned Technology. In such case Licensor shall provide Licensee with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Refused Licensed Patents so that Licensee may be informed and apprised of and be meaningfully consulted with as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall have no obligation to continue prosecution or maintenance of any Refused Licensed Patent and may abandon same without any prior notice or any obligation to Licensee. Both Licensee and Licensor shall make best efforts to respond promptly to any request from the other Party for input or assistance with respect to matters pertaining to the Licensed Patents. Licensee shall use reasonable efforts to amend any patent application to include claims reasonably requested by the other Party and required to protect the Licensed Technology. In addition to Licensee’s obligations pursuant to section 4.1 above, Licensee shall be solely responsible for all patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) from the Effective Date onward, including all costs relating to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to the new patent agents selected by Licensee and approved by Licensor. For any patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) paid by Licensor after the Effective Date (including, without limitation, those expenses related to patentability assessments and drafting, filing, prosecution, maintenance, and taxes (the “Patent Costs”)), Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for such Patent Costs upon receipt of an invoice from Licensor for such expenses. For any work in progress with respect to the Licensed Patents for which the Patent Costs have not already been paid by Licensor to its patent firm prior to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to Licensee’s patent agent, Licensor will direct its patent firm to copy Licensee on all such invoices from said patent firm and Licensee will promptly pay said invoices directly to Licensor’s patent firm.

  • Patents and Patent Applications To the Company’s knowledge, all patents and patent applications owned by or licensed to the Company or under which the Company has rights have been duly and properly filed and maintained; to the knowledge of the Company, the parties prosecuting such applications have complied with their duty of candor and disclosure to the USPTO in connection with such applications; and the Company is not aware of any facts required to be disclosed to the USPTO that were not disclosed to the USPTO and which could reasonably be expected to preclude the grant of a patent in connection with any such application or could reasonably be expected to form the basis of a finding of invalidity with respect to any patents that have issued with respect to such applications.

  • Joint Patents (i) Intrexon shall be responsible for filing, prosecuting and maintaining any Joint Patents at its own cost and expense, except that ARES TRADING shall be responsible for maintaining at its own cost and expense any issued Joint Patents which are requested by ARES TRADING and directed exclusively to the composition, formulation, manufacture or use of one or more Products (“Product Specific Patents”). ARES TRADING and Intrexon shall cooperate, to the extent such is reasonable and can be done without substantially compromising the value and or protection of any Inventions, to develop a suitable portfolio of Product Specific Patents and shall coordinate on the territory (country list) where protection is intended. To this end, during the Term ARES TRADING may request, at its discretion, that Intrexon file one or more continuation or divisional applications (as appropriate) within an application for Joint Patent for the express purpose of creating Product Specific Patents, which request shall be honored to the extent reasonable, permitted by applicable laws, and otherwise consistent with this Agreement. Each Joint Owner shall fully cooperate with the other Joint Owner in connection with the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Joint Patents. The responsible Joint Owner for a particular Joint Patent shall consult with the other Joint Owner, shall keep the other Joint Owner reasonably informed of the status of such Joint Patent, and shall promptly provide the other Joint Owner with drafts of all proposed material filings and correspondences with the patent authorities with respect to such Joint Patent for such other Joint Owner’s review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondences. The responsible Joint Owner shall confer with the other Joint Owner and take into consideration such other Joint Owner’s comments prior to submitting such filings and correspondences, provided that such other Joint Owner shall provide such comments within [*****] days of receiving the draft filings and correspondences from the responsible Joint Owner. If such other Joint Owner does not provide comments within such period of time, then such other Joint Owner shall be deemed to have no comment to such proposed filings or correspondences. In case of disagreement between the Joint Owners with respect to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Joint Patents, the final decision shall be made by the responsible Joint Owner.

  • Third Party Patent Rights If either Party desires to bring an opposition, action for declaratory judgment, nullity action, interference, declaration for non-infringement, reexamination or other attack upon the validity, title or enforceability of a Patent Right owned or controlled by a Third Party and having one or more claims that Cover the Compound or Product, or the use, sale, offer for sale or importation of the Compound or Product (except insofar as such action is a counterclaim to or defense of, or accompanies a defense of, a Third Party’s claim or assertion of infringement under Section 7.6, in which case the provisions of Section 7.6 shall govern), such Party shall so notify the other Party and the Parties shall promptly confer to determine whether to bring such action or the manner in which to settle such action. Provention shall have the exclusive right, but not the obligation, to bring, at its own expense and in its sole control, such action in the Territory. If Provention does not bring such an action in the Territory, within ninety (90) days of notification thereof pursuant to this Section 7.7(a) (or earlier, if required by the nature of the proceeding), MacroGenics shall have the right, but not the obligation, to bring, at MacroGenics’ own expense, such action. The Party not bringing an action under this Section 7.7(a) shall be entitled to separate representation in such proceeding by counsel of its own choice and at its own expense, and shall cooperate fully with the Party bringing such action. Any awards or amounts received in bringing any such action shall be first allocated to reimburse the initiating Party’s expenses in such action, and any remaining amounts shall be allocated between the Parties as provided in Section 7.5(e).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.