Common use of System Impact Study Agreement Clause in Contracts

System Impact Study Agreement. Unless otherwise agreed, within ten (10) Business Days after the delivery of the Feasibility Study to Interconnection Customer, IPA shall provide to Interconnection Customer a System Impact Study Agreement substantially in the form of Appendix 3 pursuant to which IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, will conduct a System Impact Study at Interconnection Customer’s sole cost and expense. IPA may draw upon and apply any remainder of the Interconnection Customer’s initial deposit to perform the study or have a consultant approved by IPA perform the study. In the event that the remainder of the initial deposit is not sufficient to cover the actual costs of such study, including any costs for Reassessment in accordance with Section 7.5, upon receipt of an invoice from IPA for a good faith estimate of the costs to complete such study, Interconnection Customer shall pay to IPA the amount of such estimate prior to IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, proceeding or continuing with such study. Interconnection Customer shall execute the System Impact Study Agreement and deliver the executed System Impact Study Agreement to IPA no later than thirty (30) calendar days after its receipt, along with demonstration of Site Control or the posting of a deposit in addition to that already made in Section 3.2.1(iii) in the amount specified in the Deposit Amount Schedule, which shall be refundable without interest if and when Interconnection Customer demonstrates Site Control or withdraws its application. If Interconnection Customer does not provide all required technical data when it delivers the executed System Impact Study Agreement, IPA shall notify Interconnection Customer of any deficiency within five (5) Business Days of the receipt of the executed System Impact Study Agreement. Interconnection Customer shall have ten (10) Business Days to cure the deficiency; provided, however, that if the deficiency is either a failure to deliver the executed System Impact Study Agreement or a failure to pay any additionally invoiced deposit specified above, the cure period shall not apply. If Interconnection Customer fails to cure the deficiency within the period specified above, IPA may deem the Interconnection Request withdrawn in accordance with Section 3.5. If the System Impact Study discloses any unexpected result(s) not contemplated during the Scoping Meeting or in the Feasibility Study, a substitute Point of Interconnection identified by Interconnection Customer, IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, and acceptable to the Interconnection Customer and IPA, such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld, will be substituted for the designated Point of Interconnection specified above without loss of Queue Position, and reassessments shall be completed pursuant to Section 7.5, as applicable. If IPA and Interconnection Customer cannot agree on the substituted Point of Interconnection, then Interconnection Customer may direct that one of the alternatives specified in the Feasibility Study Agreement, as approved pursuant to Section 6.1, be the substitute Point of Interconnection.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Intermountain Power Agency, Intermountain Power Agency, Intermountain Power Agency

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

System Impact Study Agreement. Unless otherwise agreed, within ten (10) Business Days after the delivery of the Feasibility Study to Interconnection Customer, IPA shall provide to Interconnection Customer a System Impact Study Agreement substantially in the form of Appendix 3 pursuant to which IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, will conduct a System Impact Study at Interconnection Customer’s sole cost and expense. IPA may draw upon and apply any remainder of the Interconnection Customer’s initial deposit to perform the study or have a consultant approved by IPA perform the study. In the event that the remainder of the initial deposit is not sufficient to cover the actual costs of such study, including any costs for Reassessment in accordance with Section 7.5, upon receipt of an invoice from IPA for a good faith estimate of the costs to complete such study, Interconnection Customer shall pay to IPA the amount of such estimate within fifteen (15) days and prior to IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, proceeding or continuing with such study. Interconnection Customer shall execute the System Impact Study Agreement and deliver the executed System Impact Study Agreement to IPA no later than thirty (30) calendar days after its receipt, along with demonstration of Site Control or the posting of a deposit in addition to that already made in Section 3.2.1(iii) in the amount specified in the Deposit Amount Schedule, which shall be refundable without interest if and when Interconnection Customer demonstrates Site Control or withdraws its application. If Interconnection Customer does not provide all required technical data when it delivers the executed System Impact Study Agreement, IPA shall notify Interconnection Customer of any deficiency within five (5) Business Days of the receipt of the executed System Impact Study Agreement. Interconnection Customer shall have ten (10) Business Days to cure the deficiency; provided, however, that if the deficiency is either a failure to deliver the executed System Impact Study Agreement or a failure to pay any additionally invoiced deposit specified above, the cure period shall not apply. If Interconnection Customer fails to cure the deficiency within the period specified above, IPA may deem the Interconnection Request withdrawn in accordance with Section 3.5. If the System Impact Study discloses any unexpected result(s) not contemplated during the Scoping Meeting or in the Feasibility Study, a substitute Point of Interconnection identified by Interconnection Customer, IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, and acceptable to the Interconnection Customer and IPA, such acceptance not to be unreasonably withheld, will be substituted for the designated Point of Interconnection specified above without loss of Queue Position, and reassessments shall be completed pursuant to Section 7.5, as applicable. If IPA and Interconnection Customer cannot agree on the substituted Point of Interconnection, then Interconnection Customer may direct that one of the alternatives specified in the Feasibility Study Agreement, as approved pursuant to Section 6.1, be the substitute Point of Interconnection.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Intermountain Power Agency, Intermountain Power Agency

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!