Reassessment. The FRC CMT Clinical Supervisor and FRC 12 CMT shall reassess the PARTICIPANT’s status, with input from Contractor Partner Agencies, in 13 a weekly clinical review of cases. FRC CMT meetings shall provide weekly evaluations and
Reassessment. IDT staff shall routinely reassess, and as appropriate update, all of the sections in the member’s comprehensive assessment and MCP as the member’s long-term care outcomes change. At a minimum, the reassessment and MCP review shall take place no later than the end of the sixth month after the month in which the previous comprehensive assessment was completed. The reassessment shall include a review of previously identified or any new member long-term care outcomes and supports available. At a minimum:
Reassessment. In the event the Property has been assessed for property tax purposes at such rates as would result in reassessment (i.e., “escape assessment” or “roll-back taxes”) based upon the change in land usage or ownership of the Property on or after the Closing Date, Buyer hereby agrees to pay all such taxes and to indemnify and save Seller harmless from and against all Liabilities for such taxes. Such indemnity shall survive the Closing and not be merged therein.
Reassessment. The CMT Clinical Supervisor and CMT shall jointly reassess the PARTICIPANT’s status in weekly clinical review of cases. CMT meetings shall provide weekly evaluations and assessment for PARTICIPANTS.
Reassessment. A detailed assessment of the Enrollee at specified intervals, after a change in health status or at the Enrollee’s request.
Reassessment. The Business Expansion Program Portfolio will follow a regular reassessment process to include the following elements: Five-Year Program Reassessment: The Business Expansion Program Portfolio, will run with a standard five- year term to allow for changes in Austin’s economic environment, community needs and shifting policy directives. Program Values and Priority Goals identified in each of the Business Expansion Categories will be examined on a five-year term to ensure proper connection with the current Austin Strategic Direction priorities. At the end of the five-year term, the program will be reassessed by City staff to determine if adjustments need to be made to the program evaluation method, criteria, process, administration, or whether the program’s current structure achieves the intended priority goals. Staff will provide a briefing to the City Council on the results of the five-year reassessment. Council must approve the continuation of and/or any changes to the program after the reassessment is complete. Staff will continue to operate and administer programs until Council action. Reassessment will include an overview of performance measured against the program’s priority goals (annual and five-year) as well as City of Austin executive leadership input and community feedback. Community stakeholders will be consulted for feedback during this reassessment process. Suggestions and identification of new needs will be solicited on a five-year basis to recalibrate program priority goals to match community needs, Council objectives, and changes in Strategic Direction. Term of Agreements & Grandfathering: Agreements made within the Business Expansion Program Portfolio are not subject to the five-year maximum term. Typically 5-10 years, the term of those agreements is made to best reflect the project’s timeline, investment, and job creation schedule and the City will honor those agreements until the termination of the agreement. In the event a program is allowed to sunset or program criteria is changed to reflect shifting conditions, existing agreements will be grandfathered for the remainder of the term of the project agreement unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in a written amendment to the agreement. The City Manager is able to propose a longer or shorter term for an agreement should the City have a competitive justification or business need for such action. All agreements must contain standard City termination provisions for economic development a...
Reassessment. If reassessment of the Feasibility Study is required due to a higher queued project dropping out of the queue, a modification of a higher queued project subject to Section 4.4, or re-designation of the Point of Interconnection pursuant to Section 6.2, IPA shall notify Interconnection Customer in writing. IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, shall use Reasonable Efforts to complete such reassessment within forty-five (45) calendar days from the date of the notice subject to extension in the manner specified in Section 6.4. All costs associated with a reassessment shall be borne by Interconnection Customer.
Reassessment. If Reassessment of the System Impact Study is required due to a higher queued project dropping out of the queue, a modification of a higher queued project subject to Section 4.4, or re-designation of the Point of Interconnection pursuant to Section 7.1, IPA shall notify Interconnection Customer in writing. IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, shall use Reasonable Efforts to complete such reassessment within sixty (60) calendar days from the date of notice, subject to extension in the manner specified in Section 7.3. All costs of associated with a reassessment shall be borne by Interconnection Customer.
Reassessment. If Reassessment of the Facilities Study is required due to a higher queued project dropping out of the queue or a modification of a higher queued project pursuant to Section 4.4, IPA shall so notify Interconnection Customer in writing. IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, shall use Reasonable Efforts to complete such reassessment within sixty (60) calendar days from the date of notice, subject to extension in the manner specified in Section 8.3. All costs associated with a reassessment shall be borne by Interconnection Customer.
Reassessment. After receiving a Notice of Intent to File an Appeal from a Class 1 or Class 3 Member, DuPont may elect to reassess the property of such Settlement Class Member, including performing a site revisit should DuPont so choose. If DuPont elects to perform such a reassessment, DuPont reserves the right to use any tree evaluation or measurement observed during the reassessment (pursuant to the requirements of Exhibits 19 and 20) to recalculate the compensation offered, regardless of whether that tree was a subject of the appeal and regardless of whether the reassessment increases or decreases the compensation provided. If DuPont provides a revised assessment (a revised statement of compensation under the Settlement prepared after the Agreement has become Final) or provides an Amended Claim Resolution Agreement before the filing of an appeal with the Panel, the revised assessment or Amended Claim Resolution Agreement shall be the operative assessment of the Settlement Class Member’s property from that date, and the Settlement Class Member may either accept the revised assessment or Amended Claim Resolution Agreement or appeal from the revised assessment or Amended Claim Resolution Agreement. Settlement Class Members who receive an Amended CRA or are in discussions with DuPont after they file a Notice of Intent to Appeal will need to notify DuPont pursuant to the procedure set forth in Exhibit 29 if they still wish to Appeal, but they need not file another Notice of Intent to Appeal.
