Reassessment. The FRC CMT Clinical Supervisor and FRC 12 CMT shall reassess the PARTICIPANT’s status, with input from Contractor Partner Agencies, in 13 a weekly clinical review of cases. FRC CMT meetings shall provide weekly evaluations and
Reassessment. In the event the Property has been assessed for property tax purposes at such rates as would result in reassessment (i.e., “escape assessment” or “roll-back taxes”) based upon the change in land usage or ownership of the Property on or after the Closing Date, Buyer hereby agrees to pay all such taxes and to indemnify and save Seller harmless from and against all Liabilities for such taxes. Such indemnity shall survive the Closing and not be merged therein.
Reassessment. The CMT Clinical Supervisor and CMT shall 1 jointly reassess the PARTICIPANT’s status, with input from Contractor Partner Agencies, in a 2 weekly clinical review of cases. CMT meetings shall provide weekly evaluations and assessment 3 for PARTICIPANTS.
Reassessment. A detailed assessment of the Enrollee at specified intervals, after a change in health status or at the Enrollee’s request.
Reassessment. After receiving an objection from a Class 1 or Class 3 Member, DuPont may elect to reassess the property of such Settlement Class Member, including performing a site revisit should DuPont so choose. If DuPont elects to perform such a reassessment, DuPont reserves the right to use any tree evaluation or measurement observed during the reassessment (pursuant to the requirements of Exhibits 19 and 20) to recalculate the compensation offered, regardless of whether that tree was a subject of the objection and regardless of whether the reassessment reduces the compensation provided. If an Amended Claim Resolution Agreement is provided to the Settlement Class Member, the Amended Claim Resolution Agreement shall be the operative assessment of the Settlement Class Member’s property from that date. The Settlement Class Member will need to determine whether to 1) accept the Amended Claim Resolution Agreement offered by DuPont and receive the compensation outlined therein; 2) participate in the Settlement, raise an appeal with the Panel after this Agreement is Final, and have compensation paid after the Panel ruling; or 3) opt-out by the Opt-Out Deadline, if such deadline has not passed. If a Settlement Class Member receives a ruling from DuPont concerning his/her/its objection and does not provide notice to DuPont selecting one of these three options within 30 days after the Settlement Class Member receives notice that the Agreement has become Final or 30 days after the Settlement Class Member receives his, her, or its proposed CRA under the Settlement, whichever is later, the Settlement Class Member will be deemed to have accepted XxXxxx’x Amended Claim Resolution Agreement.
Reassessment. IDT staff shall routinely reassess, and as appropriate update, all of the sections in the member’s comprehensive assessment and MCP as the member’s long-term care outcomes change. At a minimum, the reassessment and MCP review shall take place no later than the end of the sixth month after the month in which the previous comprehensive assessment was completed. The reassessment shall include a review of previously identified or any new member long-term care outcomes and supports available. At a minimum:
a. The IDT social services coordinator and registered nurse shall conduct this reassessment and, for vulnerable/high risk members, the reassessment shall occur in the member’s current residence;
b. The IDT staff conducting the re-assessment shall ensure that the other IDT members are updated and involved as necessary on the reassessment;
c. When a complex medication regime or behavior modifying medication or both are prescribed for a member, the requirements in C.1.c.ii. shall be met;
d. The entire IDT shall participate in the annual reassessment that is done no later than the end of the twelfth month after the previous comprehensive assessment was completed, including a face-to-face interview with the member by the IDT social services coordinator and registered nurse in the member’s current residence. In addition, the most appropriate IDT staff shall conduct a reassessment whenever there is:
e. A significant change in the member’s long term care or health care condition or situation; or
f. A request for reassessment by the member, the member’s legal decision maker, the member’s primary medical provider.
Reassessment. IDT staff shall routinely reassess, and as appropriate update, all of the sections in the member’s comprehensive assessment and MCP as the member’s long-term care outcomes change. At a minimum, the reassessment and MCP review shall take place no later than the end of the sixth month after the month in which the previous comprehensive assessment was completed. The reassessment shall include a review of previously identified or any new member long-term care outcomes and supports available. At a minimum:
a. The most appropriate IDT staff shall conduct this reassessment; and
b. The IDT staff conducting the re-assessment shall ensure that the other IDT members are updated and involved as necessary on the reassessment;
c. When a complex medication regime or behavior modifying medication or both are prescribed for a member, the requirements in C.1.c.ii. shall be met;
d. The entire IDT shall participate in the annual reassessment that is done no later than the end of the twelfth month after the previous comprehensive assessment was completed. In addition, the most appropriate IDT staff shall conduct a reassessment whenever there is:
e. A significant change in the member’s long term care or health care condition or situation; or
f. A request for reassessment by the member, the member’s legal decision maker, the member’s primary medical provider.
Reassessment. The Business Expansion Program Portfolio will follow a regular reassessment process to include the following elements: Five-Year Program Reassessment: The Business Expansion Program Portfolio, will run with a standard five- year term to allow for changes in Austin’s economic environment, community needs and shifting policy directives. Program Values and Priority Goals identified in each of the Business Expansion Categories will be examined on a five-year term to ensure proper connection with the current Austin Strategic Direction priorities. At the end of the five-year term, the program will be reassessed by City staff to determine if adjustments need to be made to the program evaluation method, criteria, process, administration, or whether the program’s current structure achieves the intended priority goals. Staff will provide a briefing to the City Council on the results of the five-year reassessment. Council must approve the continuation of and/or any changes to the program after the reassessment is complete. Staff will continue to operate and administer programs until Council action. Reassessment will include an overview of performance measured against the program’s priority goals (annual and five-year) as well as City of Austin executive leadership input and community feedback. Community stakeholders will be consulted for feedback during this reassessment process. Suggestions and identification of new needs will be solicited on a five-year basis to recalibrate program priority goals to match community needs, Council objectives, and changes in Strategic Direction. Term of Agreements & Grandfathering: Agreements made within the Business Expansion Program Portfolio are not subject to the five-year maximum term. Typically 5-10 years, the term of those agreements is made to best reflect the project’s timeline, investment, and job creation schedule and the City will honor those agreements until the termination of the agreement. In the event a program is allowed to sunset or program criteria is changed to reflect shifting conditions, existing agreements will be grandfathered for the remainder of the term of the project agreement unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in a written amendment to the agreement. The City Manager is able to propose a longer or shorter term for an agreement should the City have a competitive justification or business need for such action. All agreements must contain standard City termination provisions for economic development a...
Reassessment. If Reassessment of the Facilities Study is required due to a higher queued project dropping out of the queue or a modification of a higher queued project pursuant to Section 4.4, IPA shall so notify Interconnection Customer in writing. IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, shall use Reasonable Efforts to complete such reassessment within sixty (60) calendar days from the date of notice, subject to extension in the manner specified in Section 8.3. All costs associated with a reassessment shall be borne by Interconnection Customer.
Reassessment. If Reassessment of the System Impact Study is required due to a higher queued project dropping out of the queue, a modification of a higher queued project subject to Section 4.4, or re-designation of the Point of Interconnection pursuant to Section 7.1, IPA shall notify Interconnection Customer in writing. IPA, or a consultant approved by IPA, shall use Reasonable Efforts to complete such reassessment within sixty (60) calendar days from the date of notice, subject to extension in the manner specified in Section 7.3. All costs of associated with a reassessment shall be borne by Interconnection Customer.
