Teaching Evaluation by Peers Clause Samples
The "Teaching Evaluation by Peers" clause establishes a process for faculty members' teaching performance to be assessed by their colleagues. Typically, this involves peer reviewers observing classes, reviewing teaching materials, or providing structured feedback based on set criteria. This clause ensures that teaching quality is regularly and fairly evaluated, promoting professional development and maintaining academic standards within the institution.
Teaching Evaluation by Peers. (a) Evaluation of teaching by one's peers is designed to provide constructive assistance to Members with respect to teaching techniques;
(b) Peer review should be conducted if requested by any of: the Member, the Program Chair, or the ▇▇▇▇. The review may be carried out by the Program Chair or by a senior Faculty Member selected by the Program Chair with the consent of the Member. Program Chairs should be peer evaluated by their Deans. Such a review may, but does not necessarily include:
(i) review of teaching materials and course outlines;
(ii) interviews with students or with the Member;
(iii) review of student performance or student work; and
(iv) classroom visits;
(c) The peer reviewer will meet with the Member to discuss constructively the results of the peer evaluation. In addition, a written report of the evaluation will be provided to the Member, to which the Member may respond in writing; and
(d) All documentation related to a peer review requested by the ▇▇▇▇ or Program Chair will form part of the Member’s OPF. Peer reviews conducted at the request of the Member under Article 52 may be placed in the OPF at the option of the Member.
Teaching Evaluation by Peers. (a) Evaluation of teaching by one's peers is designed to provide constructive assistance to Members with respect to teaching techniques;
(a.1) Peer review must be conducted in advance of and included in the application for and consideration of Tenure or Continuing appointment. During the academic year preceding the application, a peer reviewer shall be selected by the Program Chair, in consultation with the Member, from among a roster of Trained Teaching Members maintained by the Centre for Teaching, Learning, and Technology. The roster will contain no fewer than one appointee from each faculty and the DMS. Peer review is considered academic, professional and/or University community service and will be recognized in accordance with 30.3.2(d).
(b) Peer review should also be conducted if requested by any of: the Member, the Program Chair, or the ▇▇▇▇. The review may be carried out by the Program Chair. Alternatively, the review may be carried out by a senior Faculty Member selected by the Program Chair in consultation with the ▇▇▇▇. Selection of the senior Faculty Member shall be with the consent of the Member. Program Chairs should be peer evaluated by their Deans.
(b.1) Peer review may, but does not necessarily include:
(i) review of the member's teaching dossier, teaching materials and course outlines;
Teaching Evaluation by Peers. (a) Evaluation of teaching by one's peers is designed to provide constructive assistance to Members with respect to teaching techniques;
(b) Peer review should be conducted if requested by any of: the Member, the Program Chair, or the ▇▇▇▇. The review may be carried out by the Program Chair. Alternatively, the review may be carried out by a senior Faculty Member selected by the Program Chair in consultation with the ▇▇▇▇. Selection of the senior Faculty Member shall be with the consent of the Member. Program Chairs should be peer evaluated by their Deans. Such a review may, but does not necessarily include:
(i) review of teaching materials and course outlines;
(ii) interviews with students or with the Member;
(iii) review of student performance or student work; and
(iv) classroom visits.
(c) The peer reviewer will meet with the Member to discuss constructively the results of the peer evaluation. In addition, a written report of the evaluation will be provided to the Member, to which the Member may respond in writing; and
(d) All documentation related to a peer review requested by the ▇▇▇▇ or Program Chair will form part of the Member's OPF. Peer reviews conducted at the request of the Member may be placed in the OPF at the option of the Member.
Teaching Evaluation by Peers. Evaluation of teaching by one's peers is designed to provide constructive assistance to Members with respect to teaching techniques;