Common use of TERM; COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE Clause in Contracts

TERM; COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE. 2.1 This Agreement shall become effective after execution by both Parties and after approval by the Commission is no longer subject to judicial review ("Effective Date"); provided, however, this Agreement shall not become effective until the Commission has determined that the prices to be paid for energy and capacity are just and reasonable, and in the public interest. For purposes of inter-jurisdictional cost allocation, this Agreement is a “New QF Contract” under the PacifiCorp Inter-Jurisdictional Cost Allocation Revised Protocol and, as such, its costs are allocated as a system resource unless any portion of the cost of this Agreement exceeds the cost PacifiCorp would have otherwise incurred acquiring comparable resources. In that event, the Revised Protocol assigns those excess costs on a situs basis. The rates, terms and conditions in this Agreement are in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions approved by the Commission in Docket No. 00-000-00 for purchases from qualifying facilities. In addition, for the purposes of inter-jurisdictional cost allocation, PacifiCorp represents that the costs of this Agreement do not exceed the costs PacifiCorp would have otherwise incurred acquiring resources in the market that are defined as “Comparable Resources” in Appendix A to the Inter-jurisdictional Cost Allocation Revised Protocol. In the event that the Commission order approving this Agreement contains any condition, that is materially adverse to either party, the party adversely impacted by the condition may terminate this Agreement by providing the other party notice within thirty (30) days of the entry of the Commission's order.

TERM; COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE. 2.1 This Agreement shall become effective after execution by both Parties and after approval by the Commission is no longer subject to judicial review ("Effective Date"); provided, however, this Agreement shall not become effective until the Commission has determined that the prices to be paid for energy and capacity are just and reasonable, and in the public interest. For purposes of inter-jurisdictional cost allocation, this Agreement is a “New QF Contract” under the PacifiCorp Inter-Jurisdictional Cost Allocation Revised Protocol and, as such, its costs are allocated as a system resource unless any portion of the cost of this Agreement exceeds the cost PacifiCorp would have otherwise incurred acquiring comparable resources. In that event, the Revised Protocol assigns those excess costs on a situs basis. The rates, terms and conditions in this Agreement are in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions approved by the Commission in Docket No. 00-000-00 for purchases from qualifying facilities. In addition, for the purposes of inter-jurisdictional cost allocation, PacifiCorp represents that the costs of this Agreement do not exceed the costs PacifiCorp would have otherwise incurred acquiring resources in the market that are defined as “Comparable Resources” in Appendix A to the Inter-Inter- jurisdictional Cost Allocation Revised Protocol. In the event that the Commission order approving this Agreement contains any condition, that is materially adverse to either party, the party adversely impacted by the condition may terminate this Agreement by providing the other party notice within thirty (30) days of the entry of the Commission's order.

TERM; COMMERCIAL OPERATION DATE. 2.1 This Agreement shall become effective after execution by both Parties and after approval by the Commission is no longer subject to judicial review ("“Effective Date"”); provided, however, this Agreement shall not become effective until the Commission has determined that the prices to be paid for energy and capacity are just and reasonable, and in the public interest. For purposes of inter-jurisdictional cost allocation, this Agreement is a “New QF Contract” under the PacifiCorp Inter-Jurisdictional Cost Allocation Revised Protocol and, as such, its costs are allocated as a system resource unless any portion of the cost of this Agreement exceeds the cost PacifiCorp would have otherwise incurred acquiring comparable resources. In that event, the Revised Protocol assigns those excess costs on a situs basis. The rates, terms and conditions in this Agreement are in accordance with the rates, terms and conditions approved by the Commission in Docket No. 00-000-00 for purchases from qualifying facilities. In addition, for the purposes of inter-jurisdictional cost allocation, PacifiCorp represents that the costs of this Agreement do not exceed the costs PacifiCorp would have otherwise incurred acquiring resources in the market that are defined as “Comparable Resources” in Appendix A to the Inter-Inter- jurisdictional Cost Allocation Revised Protocol. In the event that the Commission order approving this Agreement contains any condition, that is materially adverse to either partyParty, the party Party adversely impacted by the condition may terminate this Agreement by providing the other party Party notice within thirty (30) days of the entry of the Commission's ’s order.