Common use of Termination for Regulatory Compliance Clause in Contracts

Termination for Regulatory Compliance. Each Party and its affiliates conduct business in a highly regulated industry under privileged licenses issued by gaming regulatory authorities both domestic and international. Each Party maintains a compliance program that has been established to protect and preserve the name, reputation, integrity, and good will of such Party and its affiliates and to monitor compliance with the requirements established by gaming regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions around the world. Each Party agrees to cooperate with requests, inquiries, or investigations of gaming regulatory authorities or law enforcement agencies in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Each Party agrees to fully cooperate with the other Party in the completion of any necessary due diligence background investigation. If either Party receives a written or oral opinion, recommendation or indication from a gaming regulatory authority (including a representative thereof) or if either Party determines, based upon facts and evidence that would reasonably be accepted by gaming regulatory authorities or other licensed gaming entities, that continuation of this Agreement would jeopardize the gaming licenses, permits or status of such Party or any of its affiliates with any gaming regulatory authority or similar law enforcement authority (“Regulatory Trigger”), then: (a) such Party will give notice to the other Party of the Regulatory Trigger, including details of the opinion, recommendation, indication or asserted facts (to the extent known by the receiving Party), and provided such Party is given a time period to address the basis for said Regulatory Trigger, that Party will provide the other Party a reasonable time frame within such Party’s reasonably allotted time period to comment upon and take action to remove such basis; and (b) if such Regulatory Trigger is not cured to that Party’s reasonable satisfaction, such that a reasonable risk remains that jeopardizes the status of such Party with any gaming regulatory authority, that Party may terminate such portion of this Agreement which would cure the Regulatory Trigger (leaving the remainder of this Agreement in force and effect), and if such cannot be effected, such Party may terminate this entire Agreement immediately. In no event will IGT’s rights in the Assigned Intellectual Property or the license granted in Section 3.1, or PGIC’s perpetual, irrevocable license granted in Section 4.1 for the operation of the CEE be affected by any termination under this Article 10.

Termination for Regulatory Compliance. Each Party and its affiliates conduct business in a highly regulated industry under privileged licenses issued by gaming regulatory authorities both domestic and international. Each Party maintains a compliance program that has been established to protect and preserve the name, reputation, integrity, and good will of such Party and its affiliates and to monitor compliance with the requirements established by gaming regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions around the world. Each Party agrees to cooperate with requests, inquiries, or investigations of gaming regulatory authorities or law enforcement agencies in connection with the performance of this AgreementLASA. Each Party agrees to fully cooperate with the other Party in the completion of any necessary due diligence background investigation. If either Party receives a written or oral opinion, recommendation or indication from a gaming regulatory authority (including a representative thereof) or if either Party determines, based upon facts and evidence that would reasonably be accepted by gaming regulatory authorities or other licensed gaming entities, that continuation of this Agreement LASA would jeopardize the gaming licenses, permits or status of such Party or any of its affiliates with any gaming regulatory authority or similar law enforcement authority (“Regulatory Trigger”), then: (a) such Party will give notice to the other Party of the Regulatory Trigger, including details of the opinion, recommendation, indication or asserted facts (to the extent known by the receiving Party), and provided such Party is given a time period to address the basis for said Regulatory Trigger, that Party will provide the other Party a reasonable time frame within such Party’s 's reasonably allotted time period to comment upon and take action to remove such basis; and (b) if such Regulatory Trigger is not cured to that Party’s 's reasonable satisfaction, such that a reasonable risk remains that jeopardizes the status of such Party with any gaming regulatory authority, that Party may terminate such portion of this Agreement LASA which would cure the Regulatory Trigger (leaving the remainder of this Agreement LASA in force and effect), and if such cannot be effected, such Party may terminate this entire Agreement LASA immediately. In no event will IGT’s rights in the Assigned Intellectual Property or the license granted in Section 3.1, or PGIC’s perpetual, irrevocable license granted in Section 4.1 for the operation of the CEE be affected by any termination under this Article 10.

Termination for Regulatory Compliance. Each Party and its affiliates conduct business in a highly regulated industry under privileged licenses issued by gaming regulatory authorities both domestic and international. Each Party maintains a compliance program that has been established to protect and preserve the name, reputation, integrity, and good will of such Party and its affiliates and to monitor compliance with the requirements established by gaming regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions around the world. Each Party agrees to cooperate with requests, inquiries, or investigations of gaming regulatory authorities or law enforcement agencies in connection with the performance of this AgreementIPAA. Each Party agrees to fully cooperate with the other Party in the completion of any necessary due diligence background investigation. If either Party receives a written or oral opinion, recommendation or indication from a gaming regulatory authority (including a representative thereof) or if either Party determines, based upon facts and evidence that would reasonably be accepted by gaming regulatory authorities or other licensed gaming entities, that continuation of this Agreement IPAA would jeopardize the gaming licenses, permits or status of such Party or any of its affiliates with any gaming regulatory authority or similar law enforcement authority (“Regulatory Trigger”), then: (a) such Party will give notice to the other Party of the Regulatory Trigger, including details of the opinion, recommendation, indication or asserted facts (to the extent known by the receiving Party), and provided such Party is given a time period to address the basis for said Regulatory Trigger, that Party will provide the other Party a reasonable time frame within such Party’s 's reasonably allotted time period to comment upon and take action to remove such basis; and (b) if such Regulatory Trigger is not cured to that Party’s 's reasonable satisfaction, such that a reasonable risk remains that jeopardizes the status of such Party with any gaming regulatory authority, that Party may terminate such portion of this Agreement IPAA which would cure the Regulatory Trigger (leaving the remainder of this Agreement IPAA in force and effect), and if such cannot be effected, such Party may terminate this entire Agreement IPAA immediately. In no event will IGT’s rights in the Assigned Intellectual Property or the license granted in Section 3.1, or PGIC’s perpetual, irrevocable license granted in Section 4.1 for the operation of the CEE be affected by any termination under this Article 10.

Termination for Regulatory Compliance. Each Party and its affiliates conduct business in a highly regulated industry under privileged licenses issued by gaming regulatory authorities both domestic and international. Each Party maintains a compliance program that has been established to protect and preserve the name, reputation, integrity, and good will of such Party and its affiliates and to monitor compliance with the requirements established by gaming regulatory authorities in various jurisdictions around the world. Each Party agrees to cooperate with requests, inquiries, or investigations of gaming regulatory authorities or law enforcement agencies in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Each Party agrees to fully cooperate with the other Party in the completion of any necessary due diligence background investigation. If either Party receives a written or oral opinion, recommendation or indication from a gaming regulatory authority (including a representative thereof) or if either Party determines, based upon facts and evidence that would reasonably be accepted by gaming regulatory authorities or other licensed gaming entities, that continuation of this Agreement would jeopardize the gaming licenses, permits or status of such Party or any of its affiliates with any gaming regulatory authority or similar law enforcement authority (“Regulatory Trigger”), then: (a) such Party will give notice to the other Party of the Regulatory Trigger, including details of the opinion, recommendation, indication or asserted facts (to the extent known by the receiving Party), and provided such Party is given a time period to address the basis for said Regulatory Trigger, that Party will provide the other Party a reasonable time frame within such Party’s 's reasonably allotted time period to comment upon and take action to remove such basis; and (b) if such Regulatory Trigger is not cured to that Party’s 's reasonable satisfaction, such that a reasonable risk remains that jeopardizes the status of such Party with any gaming regulatory authority, that Party may terminate such portion of this Agreement which would cure the Regulatory Trigger (leaving the remainder of this Agreement in force and effect), and if such cannot be effected, such Party may terminate this entire Agreement immediately. In no event will IGT’s rights in the Assigned Intellectual Property or the license granted in Section 3.1, or PGIC’s perpetual, irrevocable license granted in Section 4.1 for the operation of the CEE be affected by any termination under this Article 10.