Test Reviews Sample Clauses

Test Reviews. The status of the Satellite shall be reviewed during the test phases of the program. See paragraph 4.5.3.2 for the list of reviews and required content.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Test Reviews. Each Party shall have (i) 30 days following delivery of the SSAT Deliverables and (ii) 30 days following delivery of the FSAT Deliverables to conduct reviews (each such 30-day period a “Review Period”) to determine whether the Technical Acceptance Criteria and Specifications for the Initial System have been met. If the Party designated as the customer of any Deliverable (the “Deliverable-Customer” as set forth in the table in Annex A) does not, within 10 business days following the termination of the Review Period, provide written notice to the Party responsible for developing or preparing the Deliverable (the “Deliverable-Owner”) of its rejection of such Deliverable specifying the reason why the Deliverable was not accepted, such Deliverable shall be deemed to have been accepted by the Deliverable-Customer for purposes of this Agreement.
Test Reviews. The status of the Instrument shall be reviewed during the test phases of the program as listed below. The Contractor shall produce a data package of review material for each review. [**Redacted**]
Test Reviews. Test reviews may be working level or formal meetings as appropiate organised by the Contractor prior to and following each test. In case of hardware in volume production, these reviews may be held for groups or batches of units.
Test Reviews. The status of the Satellite shall be reviewed during the test and commission phases of the program as listed below. SSI shall produce a data package of review material for each review.
Test Reviews. 38 6.5 Preshipment Review.................................................39 6.6 System and Major Subsystems Integration and Test Notification......39 6.7
Test Reviews. 9 2.7 DOCUMENTATION........................................................9 2.8 ORGANIZATION.........................................................9
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Test Reviews. 6-3 6.5 PRESHIPMENT REVIEW (PSR)..............................................................6-4 6.6 FAILURE NOTIFICATION..................................................................6-4 6.7 ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL GROUND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (EGSE/MGSE)........................6-4 6.8 TEST EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS...........................................................6-5 6.9
Test Reviews. D-R will have 10 days following receipt of the complete report from E-C (such 10-day period a “Testing Review Period”) to determine whether the applicable requirements in this Annex B have been met. If D-R does not provide written notice to E-C of its determination that such requirements have not been fully met, specifying the reason for rejection, within 5 business days following the termination of the Testing Review Period, the requirements of this Annex B will be deemed to have been met at the end of such 5 business days.

Related to Test Reviews

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Document Review The Company and the Executive hereby acknowledge and agree that each (i) has read this Agreement in its entirety prior to executing it, (ii) understands the provisions and effects of this Agreement, (iii) has consulted with such attorneys, accountants and financial and other advisors as it or he has deemed appropriate in connection with their respective execution of this Agreement, and (iv) has executed this Agreement voluntarily and knowingly.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • Acceptance Testing At the time of installation of a LIS trunk group, and at no additional charge, acceptance tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!