Texas Litigation Sample Clauses

The Texas Litigation clause designates Texas as the exclusive jurisdiction for resolving legal disputes arising from the contract. In practice, this means that any lawsuits or legal proceedings related to the agreement must be filed and heard in Texas courts, regardless of where the parties are located or where the events occurred. This clause provides predictability and convenience for parties based in Texas, while also reducing uncertainty and potential forum shopping by clearly establishing the location for dispute resolution.
Texas Litigation. As soon as practicable following the execution and delivery of this Agreement by all of the Parties, but in no event later than fifteen (15) Business Days subsequent thereto, WMI and the FDIC Parties shall use their reasonable best efforts to seek rulings from the D.C. District Court and, to the extent necessary or desirable, the Bankruptcy Court or the relevant appellate court, (a) enjoining the plaintiffs in the Texas Litigation and any other plaintiffs who have brought or may in the future bring such claims from taking any action inconsistent with the Debtors’ and the FDIC Receiver’s ownership and exclusive control of such claims and causes of action (including resolutions of such claims and causes of action), including, without limitation, prosecution of the Texas Litigation, and (b) enjoining any other Person from instituting or prosecuting any claims on behalf of WMI, WMB or the Receivership. Upon the Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as is practicable following entry of an order of the D.C. District Court and/or the Bankruptcy Court or an appellate court consistent with clauses (a) and (b) above, solely to the extent that a final non-appealable judgment has not been entered previously against the plaintiffs in the Texas Litigation as of such date, WMI and the FDIC Parties shall take any and all actions reasonably requested by WMI, the FDIC Parties or JPMC to dismiss, with prejudice, the Texas Litigation by taking any and all action as is appropriate, including without limitation, filing with the D.C. District Court a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice, substantially in the form annexed hereto as Exhibit “K”, and appealing any order of the D.C. District Court providing less than all of the relief contemplated by this Section 2.7; provided, however, that it shall not be a breach hereunder if, the Debtors and the FDIC Receiver having used their reasonable best efforts, the D.C. District Court, the Bankruptcy Court or any appellate court nevertheless (1) determines that the claims and causes of action being asserted in the Texas Litigation are, in whole or in part, not property of the Debtors and the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases and allows the current plaintiffs in the Texas Litigation to continue prosecuting the claims asserted therein, in whole or in part, or (2) does not grant the relief referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of this Section 2.7.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Texas Litigation. As soon as practicable following the execution and delivery of this Agreement by all of the Parties, but in no event later than fifteen (15) Business Days subsequent thereto, WMI and the FDIC Parties shall use their reasonable best efforts to obtain rulings from the D.C. District Court and, to the extent necessary or desirable, the Bankruptcy Court, (a) determining that the claims and causes of action being asserted in the Texas Litigation and all claims brought or may in the future be brought on behalf of WMI are property of the Debtors and the Debtors’ chapter 11 estates or the FDIC Receiver and the Receivership, as the case may be, (b) enjoining the plaintiffs in the Texas Litigation and any other plaintiffs who have brought or may in the future bring such claims from taking any action inconsistent with the Debtors’ and the FDIC Receiver’s ownership and exclusive control of such claims and causes of action (including resolutions of such claims and causes of action), including, without limitation, prosecution of the Texas Litigation, and (c) enjoining any other Person from instituting or prosecuting any claims on behalf of WMI, WMB or the Receivership. Upon the Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as is practicable following entry of an order of the
View Source
Texas Litigation. As soon as practicable following the execution and delivery of this Agreement by all of the Parties, but in no event later than fifteen (15) Business Days subsequent thereto, WMI and the FDIC Parties shall use their reasonable best efforts to obtain rulings from the D.C. District Court and, to the extent necessary or desirable, the Bankruptcy Court, (a) enjoining the plaintiffs in the Texas Litigation and any other plaintiffs who have brought or may in the future bring such claims from taking any action inconsistent with the Debtors’ and the FDIC Receiver’s ownership and exclusive control of such claims and causes of action (including resolutions of such claims and causes of action), including, without limitation, prosecution of the Texas Litigation, and (b) enjoining any other Person from instituting or prosecuting any claims on behalf of WMI, WMB or the Receivership. Upon the Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as is practicable following entry of an order of the
View Source

Related to Texas Litigation

  • Certain Litigation The Company agrees that it ------------------- shall not settle any litigation commenced after the date hereof against the Company or any of its directors by any stockholder of the Company relating to the Offer, the Merger, this Agreement or the Stockholder Agreements, without the prior written consent of Parent. In addition, the Company shall not voluntarily cooperate with any third party that may hereafter seek to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger and shall cooperate with Parent and Sub to resist any such effort to restrain or prohibit or otherwise oppose the Offer or the Merger.

  • Investigations; Litigation There is no investigation or review pending (or, to the knowledge of Parent, threatened) by any Governmental Entity with respect to Parent or any of its Subsidiaries which would have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect, and there are no actions, suits, inquiries, investigations or proceedings pending (or, to Parent’s knowledge, threatened) against or affecting Parent or its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective properties at law or in equity before, and there are no orders, judgments or decrees of, or before, any Governmental Entity, in each case which would have, individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.

  • Third Party Litigation In the event that a Third Party institutes a patent or other infringement suit against any of NovaDel, PAR or HANA or any of its respective Affiliates during the Term, alleging manufacture, use or sale of a Licensed Product in the Territory, infringes one or more patent or other intellectual property rights held by such Third Party (an “Infringement Suit”), the Parties shall cooperate with one another in defending such suit. PAR, as the NDA holder, shall have the first right to direct and control, at its expense, any Infringement Suit (including settlement negotiations, settlement or compromise thereof) to the extent that it relates to the manufacture, use or sale of a Licensed Product but does not implicate the Licensed Technology or Licensed Process. In the event that the Infringement Suit relates to the use of the Licensed Technology or Licensed Process, NovaDel shall have the first right to direct and control, at its expense, any such Infringement Suit (including settlement negotiations, settlement or compromise thereof). To the extent that any amounts become payable to any Third Party as a result of such action, whether through judgment or settlement, then PAR shall, unless HANA is jointly promoting and commercializing the Licensed Product pursuant to Section 2.4 and subject to Section 12.2, bear [***] percent ([***]%) of such amounts with respect to the Exploitation of the Licensed Product; provided, however, that PAR shall have the right to credit [***] percent ([***]%) of any amounts paid by PAR through judgment or settlement with respect to such country against the royalty payments to be paid by PAR to HANA with respect to the sale of the Licensed Product under Section 6.3; provided further, however, that no royalty payment when due, regardless of the amount or number of credits available to PAR shall be reduced by more than [***] percent ([***]%) of the amounts otherwise owed pursuant to Section 6.3 in any calendar quarter. Credits not exhausted in any calendar quarter may be carried into future calendar quarters. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that no payments are due or owing, or contemplated to be due or owing, by PAR to HANA under Article 6 with respect to the sale of the Licensed Product, then NovaDel shall pay to PAR such amount owed to a Third Party up to a cap of [***]% of such amount owed to such Third Party, less any amount already credited to PAR under this Section 10.3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NovaDel shall have no obligation under this Section 10.3 for any costs, expenses or damages that are paid or payable to a Third Party as a result of an actual or alleged infringement by PAR or HANA to the extent such costs, expenses or damages result from the use of a Product Trademark.

  • Dismissal of Litigation Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, Summit, VISX and Pillar Point shall cause all of the Summit/VISX Litigation (as hereinafter defined) to be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. As used herein, "Summit/VISX Litigation" means VISX Partner, Inc. v. Summit Partner, Inc., Sant▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Court, Case No. CV 772057; VISX, Incorporated v. Pillar Point Partners, et al., Sant▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Court, Case No. 770042; and VISX Partner, Inc., on behalf Pillar Point Partners, United States District Court, District Of Massachusetts, Case No. 96-11739-PBS. The term "Summit/VISX Litigation" includes all counterclaims, cross-claims and the like asserted in the foregoing actions.

  • Transaction Litigation In the event that any stockholder litigation related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is brought, or, to the Knowledge of the Company, threatened, against the Company or any Indemnified Party from and following the date of this Agreement and prior to the Effective Time (such litigation, other than any Proceeding in connection with, arising out of or otherwise related to a demand for appraisal under Section 262 of the DGCL, which shall be governed by Section 4.2(g), “Transaction Litigation”), the Company shall as promptly as practicable (a) notify Parent thereof and shall keep Parent reasonably informed with respect to the status thereof, (b) give Parent an opportunity to participate in the defense and/or settlement (at Parent’s sole expense and subject to a customary joint defense agreement) of any Transaction Litigation, (c) timely consult with Parent with respect to the defense and/or settlement of any Transaction Litigation and (d) shall consider in good faith Parent’s advice and recommendations with respect to such Transaction Litigation. The Company shall not agree to settle or offer to settle any Transaction Litigation without the prior written consent of Parent (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned).