THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING CLASS PLAINTIFFS’ BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS Sample Clauses

THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING CLASS PLAINTIFFS’ BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS. The Certificates held by private shareholders constitute contracts between those shareholders and the Companies. Xxxxxx Aluminum Corp. x. Xxxxxxxx, 681 A.2d 392, 394 & n.3 (Del. 1996). The District Court erred in suggesting that HERA’s jurisdictional bar applies to equitable claims related to contractual 14 Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx Estate Marital Trust v. U.S. Treasury Dep’t, 2014 WL 4661983 (D.D.C. Sept. 19, 2014), which the District Court cited in support of its holding that no conflict of interest exists between FHFA and Treasury, (Op. at 32 n.33), is inapplicable here because in Xxxxxxx, FHFA did not itself participate in Treasury’s alleged breach of fiduciary duty. 2014 WL 4661983 at *2-3.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DISMISSING CLASS PLAINTIFFS’ BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIMS

  • Breach of Contract Claims To the extent that Chapter 2260, Texas Government Code, is applicable to this Agreement and is not preempted by other applicable law, the dispute resolution process provided for in Chapter 2260 and the related rules adopted by the Texas Attorney General pursuant to Chapter 2260, will be used by University and Contractor to attempt to resolve any claim for breach of contract made by Contractor that cannot be resolved in the ordinary course of business. The chief business officer of University will examine Contractor's claim and any counterclaim and negotiate with Contractor in an effort to resolve the claims. The parties specifically agree (i) neither execution of this Agreement by University nor any other conduct, action or inaction of any representative of University relating to this Agreement constitutes or is intended to constitute a waiver of University’s or the state's sovereign immunity to suit; and (ii) University has not waived its right to seek redress in the courts.

  • RESPONDENT LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE TO GOVERNMENT PROPERTY The Respondent shall be liable for all damages to government-owned, leased, or occupied property and equipment caused by the Respondent and its employees, agents, subcontractors, and suppliers, including any delivery or cartage company, in connection with any performance pursuant to the Contract. The Respondent shall notify the City of Xxxxxx Procurement Manager in writing of any such damage within one (1) calendar day.

  • Institution of Legal Actions Any legal actions related to or arising out of this Agreement must be instituted in the District Court of Xxxxxxx County, Kansas or, if federal jurisdiction exists, in the Federal District Court in the District of Kansas.

  • Submitting False Claims; Monetary Penalties The AOC shall be entitled to remedy any false claims, as defined in California Government Code section 12650 et seq., made to the AOC by the Contractor or any Subcontractor under the standards set forth in Government Code section 12650 et seq. Any Contractor or Subcontractor who submits a false claim shall be liable to the AOC for three times the amount of damages that the AOC sustains because of the false claim. A Contractor or Subcontractor who submits a false claim shall also be liable to the AOC for (a) the costs, including attorney fees, of a civil action brought to recover any of those penalties or damages, and (b) a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each false claim.

  • LITIGATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS BA shall notify CE within forty-eight (48) hours of any litigation or administrative proceedings commenced against BA or its agents or subcontractors. In addition, BA shall make itself, and any subcontractors, employees and agents assisting BA in the performance of its obligations under the Contract or Addendum, available to CE, at no cost to CE, to testify as witnesses, or otherwise, in the event of litigation or administrative proceedings being commenced against CE, its supervisors, directors, officers, managers or employees based upon a claimed violation of HIPAA, the HITECH Act, the HIPAA regulations, or other state or federal laws relating to security and privacy, except where the BA or its subcontractors, employees or agents are a named adverse parties.

  • Other Legal Actions The actions stipulated in this Integrity Pact are without prejudice to any other legal action that may follow in accordance with the provisions of the extant law in force relating to any civil or criminal proceedings.

  • Assistance in Litigation or Administrative Proceedings Covered Entity shall provide written notice to Business Associate if litigation or administrative proceeding is commenced against Covered Entity, its directors, officers, or employees, based on a claimed violation by Business Associate of HIPAA, the HIPAA Rules or other laws relating to security and privacy or PHI. Upon receipt of such notice and to the extent requested by Covered Entity, Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractors, or agents assisting Business Associate in the performance of its obligations under the Contract to, assist Covered Entity in the defense of such litigation or proceedings. Business Associate shall, and shall cause its employees, Subcontractor’s and agents to, provide assistance, to Covered Entity, which may include testifying as a witness at such proceedings. Business Associate or any of its employees, Subcontractors or agents shall not be required to provide such assistance if Business Associate is a named adverse party.

  • Breach of Contract and Liquidated Damages A. Where OGS determines that the Contractor is not in compliance with the requirements of this Contract, and the Contractor refuses to comply with such requirements, or if it is found to have willfully and intentionally failed to comply with the MWBE participation goals set forth in the Contract, the Contractor shall be obligated to pay liquidated damages to OGS.

  • Administrative Civil Liability The Settling Respondent hereby agrees to the imposition of an administrative civil liability totaling $549,600 to resolve the alleged violations set forth in Section II, paragraph 4, as follows:

  • Competent Court The Court of Milan shall have jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of this offer to purchase.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!