Related Cases. Provide the file numbers which relate to applications on this property that have been filed in the past.
Related Cases. 🞏 🞏 Existing Site Plan: Yes No 🞏 🞏 Subdivision Case: Yes No File Number: File Number: Name of Development Project: The undersigned Landowner/Tenant/Applicant declare that the information provided in this application is true and correct. I have read and understand that the processing of this Application will be handled in accordance with the Procedure for Requesting a License Agreement and that no action on processing will be taken without payment of the non-refundable processing fee. I understand that acceptance of this application and fee in no way obligates the City of Austin to license the subject area. I understand that the value of the Right-of-Way, if recommended to be licensed, will be determined by the City of Austin, Real Estate Services Division and a Check and Certificate of Insurance must be presented before the request will be recommended for Administrative Approval. It is further understood that the City of Austin is not responsible for any cost or inconvenience incurred by the Landowner/Tenant/Applicant/Agent with the application is not approved. Landowner’s Signature: Applicant’s Signature: Tenant’s Signature: If you have questions, please email, or call Land Management Department: XxxxXxxxxxxxxx0@XxxxxxXxxxx.xxx Office: (000) 000-0000
Related Cases. This case has not previously been before this Court. Counsel is aware of the following ongoing, related cases in the District of Columbia, involving certain of the same defendants and arising out of the same Government action challenged here. The Perry Capital, Fairholme and Xxxxxxxx appeals listed below (Nos. 14- 5243, 14-5254 and 14-5260) have been consolidated with this appeal (No. 14- 5262) by order of the Court: • Perry Capital LLC x. Xxx, et al., No. 14-5243 (D.C. Cir.) • Fairholme Funds, Inc., et al. v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, et al., No. 14-5254 (D.C. Cir.) • Xxxxxxxx Indemnity Inc., et al. v. Federal National Mortgage Association, et al., No. 14-5260 (D.C. Cir.) • Xxxxxxxx Indemnity, Inc., et al. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-698- MMS (Fed. Cl.) • Cacciapalle v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-466-MMS (Fed. Cl.) • Fairholme Funds, Inc., et al. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-465-MMS (Fed. Cl.) • Xxxxxx, et al. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-608-MMS (Fed. Cl.) • Xxxxxx, et al. v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-740-MMS (Fed. Cl.) • Washington Federal, et al. v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-385-MMS (Fed. Cl) CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and D.C. Circuit Rule 26.1, Appellants make the following disclosures: Appellants Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx and Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxx are individuals and not corporations. Appellant American European Insurance Company is a New Jersey corporation that invests in securities, including the Xxxxxx Xxx Preferred Stock and Freddie Mac Preferred Stock at issue in this action. It has no parent company, and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of its stock. Appellant Marneu Holdings, Co. is a New York general partnership that invests in securities, including the Xxxxxx Xxx Preferred Stock and Freddie Mac Preferred Stock at issue in this action. It has no parent company, and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of its partnership interests. Appellant United Equities Commodities, Co. is a New York general partnership that invests in securities, including the Xxxxxx Xxx Preferred Stock and Freddie Mac Preferred Stock at issue in this action. It has no parent company, and no publicly held company owns 10 percent or more of its partnership interests. Appellant 111 Xxxx Realty Corp. is a New York “S” corporation that invests in securities, including the Xxxxxx Xxx Preferred Stock at issue in this action. I...
Related Cases. 2001-01-SPA, ER 2001-12
