The Lack of Common Interpretation Mechanisms Sample Clauses

The Lack of Common Interpretation Mechanisms. After the adoption of the 1929 Warsaw Convention, the IATA – which was in charge of the preparation of uniform documents of carriage – asked the CITEJA223 in 1933 to give its interpretation on the concept of ‘arrêts prévus’ under Article 3 of the convention.224 Following the IATA question, the Third Conference – which led notably to the adoption of the 1933 Rome Convention – expressed the wish that an analysis be conducted on the potential role of the CITEJA as an advi- sory source of interpretation on private air law conventions.225 From that perspective, the Rapporteur Xxxxxx xx xx Xxxxxxxx suggested amending the CITEJA internal rules,226 and, during the XII session of the CITEJA in 1937, submitted a draft convention which would have given the CITEJA the option of providing interpretative advice with respect to private air law 221 See, Xxxx Xxxxx, Une juridiction supranationale pour l’interprétation du droit unifié?, 13 Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 717-735 (1961). 222 See, for example, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Traité de droit aérien-aéronautique 59 (2nd edition, Xxxxxx, 1964); Huib Drion, Towards A Uniform Interpretation of the Private Air Law Conventions, 19 J. Air L. & Com. 423 (1952). 223 For a detailed description of its working methodology, see, Le Comité International Technique d’Experts Juridiques Aériens, Son origine, son but, son oeuvre (Publications du Comité International Technique d’Experts Juridiques Aériens, 1931); Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, The Warsaw Convention and the CITEJA, 6. J. Air L. & Com. 79 (1935).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The Lack of Common Interpretation Mechanisms

  • Application and Interpretation For the purposes of this Chapter:

  • Construction and Interpretation Should any provision of this Agreement require judicial interpretation, the parties hereto agree that the court interpreting or construing the same shall not apply a presumption that the terms hereof shall be more strictly construed against one party by reason of the rule of construction that a document is to be more strictly construed against the party that itself, or through its agent, prepared the same, and it is expressly agreed and acknowledged that Company and Executive and each of his and its representatives, legal and otherwise, have participated in the preparation hereof.

  • Definitions Interpretations For purposes of this Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall have the following respective meanings:

  • Governing Law; Interpretation This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to conflict of law principles. In the event of any dispute, this Agreement is intended by the parties to be construed as a whole, to be interpreted in accordance with its fair meaning, and not to be construed strictly for or against either you or the Company or the “drafter” of all or any portion of this Agreement.

  • Captions and Interpretations Paragraph headings in this Agreement are used solely for convenience, and shall be wholly disregarded in the construction of this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted for or against a party because that party or its legal representative drafted such provision, and this Agreement shall be construed as if jointly prepared by the Parties.

  • Clarifications and Interpretations It may be determined that clarifications or interpretations of the Contract Documents are necessary. Upon direction by the ODR such clarifications or interpretations will be provided by the A/E consistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. The A/E will issue these clarifications with reasonable promptness to the Contractor as Architect’s Supplemental Instruction (ASI) or similar instrument. If Contractor believes that such clarification or interpretation justifies an adjustment in the Contract Sum or the Contract Time, the Contractor shall so notify the Owner in accordance with the provisions of Article 11.

  • Interpretation and Application For purposes of this Chapter:

  • Definitions and Interpretations The terms "specifically approved at least annually," "vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities," "assignment," "affiliated person," and "interested person," when used in this Agreement, shall have the respective meanings specified, and shall be construed in a manner consistent with, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. Any question of interpretation of any term or provision of this Agreement having a counterpart in or otherwise derived from a term or provision of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (collectively, the "Federal Securities Acts") shall be resolved by reference to such term or provision of the Federal Securities Acts and to interpretations thereof, if any, by United States federal courts or, in the absence of any controlling decisions of any such court, by rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Where the effect of a requirement of the Federal Securities Acts reflected in any provision of this Agreement is revised by rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such provisions shall be deemed to incorporate the effect of such rule or regulation.

  • Definitions Interpretation 1.1. As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the following meanings:

  • Definition and Interpretation 1.1 Except as otherwise defined in the terms or context hereof, the following terms in this Agreement shall have the following meanings:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.