Common use of Timelines and reports Clause in Contracts

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
(annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
Thesis Committee _________________________ (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx Oldenburg and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet at any timeInternet: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice xxxx://xxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx/en/academic-research/goodscientificpractice/ xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_0198.pdf Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmesstudents. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At In the start beginning of his/her scientific work, the PhD student should compile an exposé (thesis concept paper) with a timeline that allows a successful completion of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project PhD thesis within the planned total period agreed (usually about three to four years). The PhD student must should wherever applicable document the course his/her progress in written reports. An updated time line should be part of each report. [Name of the project Doctorade Candidate] will participate in regular reports the RTG program and the PhD Program [“Neurosensory Science and Systems”]. [Name of the Doctorade Candidate] will take part in the PhD program courses and events to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
(annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2aan adequate extent. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. At German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence institutions, freedom of science in research research, teaching and teachingstudies is guaranteed. This freedom and independence is coupled associated with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, for fostering the fundamental values and standards norms of good scientific practice, for realizing them in the researcher’s daily activity and for defending them. The successful implementation application of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a the high level standard of achievement in the scientific standardssystem. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of recommendations on fundamentals for good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any timework are as follows: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be truth maintain absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the The PhD student should be aware of all principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed The information can be obtained through the daily work participation in an adequate course offered by the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some Graduate School of the OLTECH PhD study programmesFaculty V and/or the daily activities of the research group. The principles of good scientific practice can always are to be consulted looked up by the doctoral candidatePhD student (e.g. at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx/download/gute_wiss._praxis_web.pdf). PhD Students have to learn about good scientific practice in a corresponding Workshop. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are Each PhD student is personally responsible for their his/her own research work. A working group or unit usually has one group leader. The primary supervisor is responsible group leader carries the responsibility for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group work and the conditions for facilitating an effective cooperation and coordination of the members. The individual All members of the a working group have to trust one another to must be able to work productively, because rely on each other since mutual trust is the basis for all conversations, discussions and even confrontations. Cooperation in scientific working groups must allow the findings to be communicated, critically discussed and integrated into a common level of an open discussion knowledge and communication cultureexperience. Scientific misconduct: Misconduct, including the production and use of incorrect data, neglecting intellectual property rights and affecting others research activities, must be completely avoided. The cooperation within Xxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx University Oldenburg has appointed two confidants as contacts who look into allegations of misconduct and the work group must enable “Commission for Impact Assessment and Ethics” who inquire into the presentation case of misconduct. The rules of procedures and the time limits for inquiries and investigations to ascertain the facts and rights of the involved parties to be heard are also defined. The sanctions depend on the seriousness of the proven misconduct and include consequences for employment, civil implications or penal consequences of the misconducting scientist(s). The Xxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx University of Oldenburg has defined proceedings in the case of suspicion of scientific misconduct: Documenting results: Experiments and numerical calculations can only be repeated if all important steps are reproducible. For this purpose, critical discussion they must be recorded in a clear and incorporation comprehensive manner. Therefore, the PhD students should securely store methods and primary data as the basis for publications for at least ten years in a durable form in the institution of this into origin. Working groups usually consist of older and younger, experienced and less experienced scientists. Younger members or less experienced members of the common pool group should receive adequate mentorship of experiencethe senior scientist(s). In conflict situations the confident committee as well as the coordinator should mediate between both parties.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx Oldenburg and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet at any timeInternet: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice/ xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xx/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_1310.pdf. Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmesstudents. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At In the start beginning of his/her scientific work, the PhD student should compile an exposé (thesis concept paper) with a timeline that allows a successful completion of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project PhD thesis within the planned total period agreed (usually about three to four years). The PhD student must should wherever applicable document the course his/her progress in written reports. An updated time line should be part of each report. [Name of the project Doctorade Candidate] will participate in regular reports the RTG program and the PhD Program [“Neurosensory Science and Systems”]. [Name of the Doctorade Candidate] will take part in the PhD program courses and events to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
(annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2aan adequate extent. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. At German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence institutions, freedom of science in research research, teaching and teachingstudies is guaranteed. This freedom and independence is coupled associated with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, for fostering the fundamental values and standards norms of good scientific practice, for realizing them in the researcher’s daily activity and for defending them. The successful implementation application of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a the high level standard of achievement in the scientific standardssystem. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of recommendations on fundamentals for good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any timework are as follows: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be truth maintain absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the The PhD student should be aware of all principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed The information can be obtained through the daily work participation in an adequate course offered by the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some Graduate School of the OLTECH PhD study programmesFaculty V and/or the daily activities of the research group. The principles of good scientific practice can always are to be consulted looked up by the doctoral candidatePhD student (e.g. at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx/download/gute_wiss._praxis_web.pdf). PhD Students have to learn about good scientific practice in a corresponding Workshop. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are Each PhD student is personally responsible for their his/her own research work. A working group or unit usually has one group leader. The primary supervisor is responsible group leader carries the responsibility for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group work and the conditions for facilitating an effective cooperation and coordination of the members. The individual All members of the a working group have to trust one another to must be able to work productively, because rely on each other since mutual trust is the basis for all conversations, discussions and even confrontations. Cooperation in scientific working groups must allow the findings to be communicated, critically discussed and integrated into a common level of an open discussion knowledge and communication cultureexperience. Scientific misconduct: Misconduct, including the production and use of incorrect data, neglecting intellectual property rights and affecting others research activities, must be completely avoided. The cooperation within Xxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx University Oldenburg has appointed two confidants as contacts who look into allegations of misconduct and the work group must enable “Commission for Impact Assessment and Ethics” who inquire into the presentation case of misconduct. The rules of procedures and the time limits for inquiries and investigations to ascertain the facts and rights of the involved parties to be heard are also defined. The sanctions depend on the seriousness of the proven misconduct and include consequences for employment, civil implications or penal consequences of the misconducting scientist(s). The Xxxx xxx Xxxxxxxxx University of Oldenburg has defined proceedings in the case of suspicion of scientific misconduct: xxxx://xxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx/uni/amtliche_mitteilungen/dateien/AM2000-01_Ordwissf.pdf Documenting results: Experiments and numerical calculations can only be repeated if all important steps are reproducible. For this purpose, critical discussion they must be recorded in a clear and incorporation comprehensive manner. Therefore, the PhD students should securely store methods and primary data as the basis for publications for at least ten years in a durable form in the institution of this into origin. Working groups usually consist of older and younger, experienced and less experienced scientists. Younger members or less experienced members of the common pool group should receive adequate mentorship of experiencethe senior scientist(s). In conflict situations the confident committee as well as the coordinator should mediate between both parties.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet at any timeInternet: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmesstudents. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx Oldenburg and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.

Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, doctorate the doctoral student has to develop create a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure that a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period is allowed (usually three to four years). The PhD student must is obliged to document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder xxxxxx Sie hier, um Text einzugeben.
Thesis Committee _________________________ (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Xxxxxxxxx and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet at any time: xxxxx://xxx.xx/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice xxxx://xxx.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xx/en/academic-research/goodscientificpractice/ xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_0198.pdf Awareness of and sensitivity to of the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific workworking. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is are conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmesstudents. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this into the common pool of experience.