Transmission Costs Sample Clauses

Transmission Costs. Buyer shall be responsible for the costs of delivery of the electric energy from the Generating Facility to the Delivery Point (the “Transmission Costs”). The Transmission Costs are set forth in the Schedules to Pacificorp’s FERC Electric Tariff 7th Rev. Volume No. 11 (the “Tariff”). Under the most recent form of the Tariff, Transmission Costs are $2.025 per kilowatt per month for wheeling, $0.08 per MWh for scheduling, system control and dispatch, and $0.18 per MWh for reactive supply and voltage control. Buyer shall be responsible for any changes to the Transmission Costs as a result of changes to the Tariff.

Transmission Costs. Background A Subscriber Participating TO will not include in the ISO TAC the cost of their project. The project will be modeled in the full network model and only the self- schedule quantity provided by the subscriber in the day-ahead and real-time market will encumber the line. The remaining portion of the line will be available for ISO market optimization. However if a non-subscriber uses the line, there will be an additional Subscriber Wheeling Charge for use of the line since the cost is not recovered from the TAC or the ISO’s Regional Wheeling Access Charge (“WAC”). Non-subscriber uses of a Subscriber PTO project can include capacity of the project not subject to subscriber rights (such as south-to-north capacity on the TransWest Project) or capacity released by the subscriber for third party use. The ISO has concluded that a separate Subscriber Wheeling Access Charge is appropriate under the unique circumstances of the Subscriber PTO Model. The ISO believes that, consistent with open access principles the project of a Subscriber PTO cannot be used by non-subscribers for free. On the other hand, including any costs of non-subscriber uses of a Subscriber PTO’s transmission facilities in the TAC or WAC would be contrary to a fundamental design principle of the Model, allowing these projects to move forward without funding by all ISO customers paying the TAC or WAC. Similar to the TAC and WAC, the existing Participating TOs recover the cost of usage of current ISO controlled grid facilities through the ISO market systems. For the project, because the Subscriber Participating TO is not including the revenue requirements for the original build or ongoing costs of its project in the TAC or WAC, it should be entitled to cost recovery if a Scheduling Coordinator other than a subscriber uses the project. Therefore there will be an additional volumetric charge ($/MWH) above the TAC – i.e. the Subscriber Wheeling Charge – to use the project. The Subscriber Wheeling Charge will be developed in accordance with Subscriber Participating TO’s transmission owner tariff and approved by FERC, following the same process and meeting the same regulatory requirements as all other inputs to ISO other transmission charges for Participating TOs do today. If in the future additional generation projects seek to interconnect with the Subscriber Participating TO line, the generating facility will be evaluated as any other potential projects through the ISO’s generator interconnect...

Transmission Costs. The annual City transmission and distribution costs multiplied by the ratio of the lineal feet of mains eight inches and greater, less the lineal feet of mains used exclusively for the District, divided by the prior year's total City Internal System consumption, plus the projected increase in current year's total consumption for the District, multiplied by the District’s projected current year's consumption as provided by the District to t no later than December 31 of each year.

Transmission Costs. As part of one of the rate proceedings contemplated by the agreement, KCPL agrees to include a proposal to have its transmission costs reflected in separate rates when it can be done appropriately consistent with its wholesale tariffs. KCPL will consult with the parties about the timing of such a proposal.