Common use of Uni-raciality and European theorisations of ethnicity Clause in Contracts

Uni-raciality and European theorisations of ethnicity. According to Xxxxxxx (1992) the notion of uni-raciality can be linked to European theories of ethnicity because he believes that ‘the Japanese view of nationality […] is very much an ethnic one’ (Yoshino 1992, p. 68). Some of the theories he mentions19 are: primordialism, Xxxxx’x (1969) boundary approach as well as modernist theorisations such as Xxxxxxxx’x (1983) notion of invented tradition and Xxxxxxxx’x (1983) notion of imagined communities. I have also added two further theorisations: Xxxxxxx’s notion of fictive ethnicity and Schermerhorn’s definition of an ethnic group.

Uni-raciality and European theorisations of ethnicity. According to Xxxxxxx Yoshino (1992) the notion of uni-raciality can be linked to European theories of ethnicity because he believes that ‘the Japanese view of nationality […] is very much an ethnic one’ (Yoshino 1992, p. 68). Some of the theories he mentions19 are: primordialism, Xxxxx’x (1969) boundary approach as well as modernist theorisations such as Xxxxxxxx’x (1983) notion of invented tradition and Xxxxxxxx’x (1983) notion of imagined communities. I have also added two further theorisations: XxxxxxxBalibar’s notion of fictive ethnicity and Schermerhorn’s definition of an ethnic group.

Uni-raciality and European theorisations of ethnicity. According to Xxxxxxx Yoshino (1992) the notion of uni-raciality can be linked to European theories of ethnicity because he believes that ‘the Japanese view of nationality […] is very much an ethnic one’ (Yoshino 1992, p. 68). Some of the theories he mentions19 are: primordialism, Xxxxx’x (1969) boundary approach as well as modernist theorisations such as Xxxxxxxx’x (1983) notion of invented tradition and Xxxxxxxx’x (1983) notion of imagined communities. I have also added two further theorisations: Xxxxxxx’s notion of fictive ethnicity and Schermerhorn’s definition of an ethnic group.