Written Evaluations by Referees, Colleagues and Students. a) All referees shall normally be senior academics with the rank of Professor and at arm’s length from the candidate. b) The Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from a minimum of two (2) internal referees. Whenever possible, these internal referees should be drawn from the Faculty in which the candidate holds an appointment, or from related disciplines. External referees can be substituted in consultation with the candidate if there is a shortage of qualified internal referees. c) The candidate shall provide the Xxxx with a list of at least four (4) possible external referees. The Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from at least two (2) external referees from this list of nominees. d) In addition, the Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from at least two (2) external referees knowledgeable in the candidate's discipline. e) The documentation provided to the Tenure and Promotion Committee shall make it clear which referees were nominated by the candidate or by the Xxxx, and shall include a statement describing the qualifications of each referee. f) Supervisors and collaborators cannot act as referees. g) When inviting prospective referees, the Xxxx shall include a copy of the criteria for promotion from Article 22.01, as well as Article 16, that outlines the way that Research, Teaching, and Service are defined for Faculty Members at UOIT. h) All referees shall be provided with the documentation as set out in Article 22.08 a) i), ii), iii) and iv),. All referees shall be asked to evaluate the candidate’s Research. Referees shall also be asked to assess the candidate’s Teaching. External Referees shall evaluate Teaching based on the materials in the Teaching Dossier. Internal Referees shall also spend some time in the classroom (face-to-face and/or online) of the candidate whose Teaching is being assessed as well as examining the candidate’s Teaching
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement
Written Evaluations by Referees, Colleagues and Students.
a) All referees shall normally be senior academics with the rank of Professor and at arm’s length from the candidate.
b) The Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from a minimum of two (2) internal referees. Whenever possible, these internal referees should be drawn from the Faculty in which the candidate holds an appointment, or from related disciplines. External referees can be substituted in consultation with the candidate if there is a shortage of qualified internal referees.
c) The candidate shall provide the Xxxx with a list of at least four (4) possible external refereesreferees by June 30. The Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from at least two (2) external referees from this list of nominees.
d) In addition, the Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from at least two (2) external referees knowledgeable in the candidate's discipline.
e) It is preferable that the candidate and the Xxxx agree on a common list from which referees are to be selected under Article 22.06 c) and d). If the Xxxx wishes to inquire of external referees to whom the candidate has objections, the candidate may state their objections orally and in writing. Written objections to any external referee shall become part of the documentation forwarded by the Xxxx to the Faculty Review Committee and the Tenure and Promotion Committee. If any referee(s) from the common list is unavailable, the Xxxx may have to ask additional referees to participate in the process. If this occurs, the Xxxx shall follow the process set out here as expeditiously as possible.
f) The documentation provided to the Tenure and Promotion Committee shall make it clear which referees were nominated by the candidate or by the Xxxx, and shall include a statement describing the qualifications of each referee.
fg) Supervisors and collaborators cannot act as referees.
gh) When inviting prospective referees, the Xxxx shall include a copy of the criteria for promotion from Article 22.01, as well as Article 16, that outlines the way that Research, Teaching, and Service are defined for Faculty Members at UOITthe University.
hi) All referees shall be provided with the documentation as set out in Article 22.08 a) i), ii), iii) and iv),. All referees shall be asked to evaluate the candidate’s Research. Referees shall also be asked to assess the candidate’s Teaching. External Referees shall evaluate Teaching based on the materials in the Teaching Dossier. Internal Referees shall also spend some time in the classroom (face-to-face and/or online) of the candidate whose Teaching is being assessed as well as examining the candidate’s Teaching Dossier.
j) The referees shall be directed to evaluate separately the candidate’s Research and Teaching with respect to whether the candidate has attained an established record of excellence, or whether the candidate has attained an established record of continuing high quality, or whether the candidate has fallen short of establishing a record of continuing high quality. Referees shall not be asked to make a recommendation either for or against promotion.
k) Referees shall be asked to submit their letters of appraisal by October 15.
l) The Xxxx shall seek written evaluations from members of the relevant Faculty(ies). The Xxxx shall write to all members of the relevant Faculty(ies) inviting them to write to the Xxxx with comments on the candidate’s suitability for promotion as it relates to Research, Teaching, and Service, and based on the criteria in Article 22.01. These signed letters shall all be compiled in the promotion file.
m) The Xxxx may communicate with former students of the candidate requesting letters evaluating the Faculty Member’s Teaching. These signed letters shall all be compiled in the promotion file
n) The candidate may also ask colleagues and former students for written reviews and include these letters in the promotion documentation. These signed letters shall all be compiled in the promotion file and identified as solicited reviews in the dossier.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Agreement
Written Evaluations by Referees, Colleagues and Students. a) All referees shall normally be senior academics with the rank of Professor and at arm’s length from the candidate.
b) The Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from a minimum of two (2) internal referees. Whenever possible, these internal referees should be drawn from the Faculty in which the candidate holds an appointment, or from related disciplines. External referees can be substituted in consultation with the candidate if there is a shortage of qualified internal referees.
c) The candidate shall provide the Xxxx with a list of at least four (4) possible external refereesreferees by June 30. The Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from at least two (2) external referees from this list of nominees.
d) In addition, the Xxxx shall obtain letters of appraisal from at least two (2) external referees knowledgeable in the candidate's discipline.
e) It is preferable that the candidate and the Xxxx agree on a common list from which referees are to be selected under Article 22.06 c) and d). If the Xxxx wishes to inquire of external referees to whom the candidate has objections, the candidate may state their objections orally and in writing. Written objections to any external referee shall become part of the documentation forwarded by the Xxxx to the Faculty Review Committee and the Tenure and Promotion Committee. If any referee(s) from the common list is unavailable, the Xxxx may have to ask additional referees to participate in the process. If this occurs, the Xxxx shall follow the process set out here as expeditiously as possible.
f) The documentation provided to the Tenure and Promotion Committee shall make it clear which referees were nominated by the candidate or by the Xxxx, and shall include a statement describing the qualifications of each referee.
fg) Supervisors and collaborators cannot act as referees.
gh) When inviting prospective referees, the Xxxx shall include a copy of the criteria for promotion from Article 22.01, as well as Article 16, that outlines the way that Research, Teaching, and Service are defined for Faculty Members at UOITthe University.
hi) All referees shall be provided with the documentation as set out in Article 22.08 a) i), ii), iii) and iv),. All referees shall be asked to evaluate the candidate’s Research. Referees shall also be asked to assess the candidate’s Teaching. External Referees shall evaluate Teaching based on the materials in the Teaching Dossier. Internal Referees shall also spend some time in the classroom (face-to-face and/or online) of the candidate whose Teaching is being assessed as well as examining the candidate’s Teaching Dossier.
j) The referees shall be directed to evaluate separately the candidate’s Research and Teaching with respect to whether the candidate has attained an established record of excellence, or whether the candidate has attained an established record of continuing high quality, or whether the candidate has fallen short of establishing a record of continuing high quality. Referees shall not be asked to make a recommendation either for or against promotion.
k) Referees shall be asked to submit their letters of appraisal by October 15.
l) The Xxxx shall seek written evaluations from members of the relevant Faculty(ies). The Xxxx shall write to all members of the relevant Faculty(ies) inviting them to write to the Xxxx with comments on the candidate’s suitability for promotion as it relates to Research, Teaching, and Service, and based on the criteria in Article 22.01. These signed letters shall all be compiled in the promotion file.
m) The Xxxx may communicate with former students of the candidate requesting letters evaluating the Faculty Member’s Teaching. These signed letters shall all be compiled in the promotion file
n) The candidate may also ask colleagues and former students for written reviews and include these letters in the promotion documentation. These signed letters shall all be compiled in the promotion file and identified as solicited reviews in the dossier.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Agreement
