Common Contracts

1 similar Interobserver Agreement Study contracts

Tendon/Tumor 105S
Interobserver Agreement Study • September 17th, 2016

interns). It was then evaluated by the interobserver agree- ment using the kappa coefficient, separated by groups—(1) tendon avulsion, (2) avulsion fracture, (3) fracture of the dorsal lip, and (4) phisis injury—and subgroups (each group divided into 1 and 2). Results: Agreement was excellent for the group A (k, 0.95 [0.93-0.97]) and remained good when separated into A1 and A2; group B was reasonable (k, 0.42 [0.39-0.44]), and poor when separated into B1 and B2; in the group C, agreement was good (k, 0.72 [0.70-0.74]), but when separated into C1 and C2, it became moderate. In group D, agreement was always bad (k, 0.16 [0.14-0.19]). The general agreement was moderate, with k, 0.57 (0.56- 0.58). Conclusion: Albertoni’s classification evaluated for interobserver agreement is considered a reproducible clas- sification by the method used in the research.

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!