Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Outpatient Head CT Scans in an Academic Neuroradiology PracticeInterobserver Agreement Study • December 23rd, 2014
INTERVENTIONALInterobserver Agreement Study • May 28th, 2013
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although flow diversion devices are popular in treatment of aneurysms, angiographic assessment with these devices has rarely been verified by interobserver variability study. The purpose of this study was to determine the interobserver agreement of a 3-point grading system for assessing the angiographic outcome after flow diversion therapy of intracranial, saccular aneurysms and to determine factors affecting such agreement.
INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT ON MNA NUTRITIONAL SCALE OF HOSPITALIZED ELDERLY PATIENTSInterobserver Agreement Study • July 10th, 2007
Interobserver Agreement of Semi-automated, Volumetric Analysis of multiparametric MRI in Patients with Liver Cancer Susanne Bonekamp1, David Bonekamp1, Vivek Gowdra Halappa1, Jean Francois Geschwind1, John Eng1, Celia Pamela Corona-Villalobos1, Diane...Interobserver Agreement Study • November 11th, 2012
Purpose of Study A reliable measure of response to treatment is important for clinical practice and for clinical trials in oncology. The purpose of our study was to assess the interobserver agreement of two semi-automated methods and a manual approach measuring the following functional, volumetric and morphologic parameters: 1) apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), 2) venous enhancement (VE), 3) maximal tumor
Interobserver Agreement in Assessment of Clinical Variables in Children with Blunt Head TraumaInterobserver Agreement Study • September 4th, 2008
Marc H. Gorelick, MD, MSCE, Shireen M. Atabaki, MD, MPH, John Hoyle, MD, Peter S. Dayan, MD, MSc, James F. Holmes, MD, MPH, Richard Holubkov, PhD, David Monroe, MD, James M. Callahan, MD, Nathan Kuppermann, MD, MPH, for the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)
Interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographsInterobserver Agreement Study • May 26th, 2014
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Science Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea
Tendon/Tumor 105SInterobserver Agreement Study • September 17th, 2016
interns). It was then evaluated by the interobserver agree- ment using the kappa coefficient, separated by groups—(1) tendon avulsion, (2) avulsion fracture, (3) fracture of the dorsal lip, and (4) phisis injury—and subgroups (each group divided into 1 and 2). Results: Agreement was excellent for the group A (k, 0.95 [0.93-0.97]) and remained good when separated into A1 and A2; group B was reasonable (k, 0.42 [0.39-0.44]), and poor when separated into B1 and B2; in the group C, agreement was good (k, 0.72 [0.70-0.74]), but when separated into C1 and C2, it became moderate. In group D, agreement was always bad (k, 0.16 [0.14-0.19]). The general agreement was moderate, with k, 0.57 (0.56- 0.58). Conclusion: Albertoni’s classification evaluated for interobserver agreement is considered a reproducible clas- sification by the method used in the research.
ContractInterobserver Agreement Study • December 21st, 2012
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(5):536-40.Interobserver Agreement Study • August 15th, 2012
Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies.
Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Lexicon for US: Interobserver Agreement for Assessment of Breast MassesInterobserver Agreement Study • September 21st, 2021
ContractInterobserver Agreement Study • November 27th, 2008
The Interobserver Agreement between Residents and Experienced Radiologists for Detecting Pulmonary Embolism and DVT with Using CT Pulmonary Angiography and Indirect CT Venography
ContractInterobserver Agreement Study • January 8th, 2010
Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies.
Interobserver agreement in perineal ultrasound measurement of the anovaginal distance: a methodological studyInterobserver Agreement Study • June 20th, 2018
The self-archived postprint version of this journal article is available at Linköping University Institutional Repository (DiVA): http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-147921
