Washington, D.C. 20210Full Funding Grant Agreement • September 3rd, 2023
Contract Type FiledSeptember 3rd, 2023This letter is a further reply to the request from your office that we review the above-captioned application for a grant under section 13(c) of the Urban Mass Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1609(c) (1964), now codified as part of the Federal Transit Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b). On September 4, 2013, I sent you the Department of Labor's final determination concerning Sacramento Regional Transit District's (SacRTD's) ability to preserve and continue, consistent with section 13(c), the pension benefits and collective bargaining rights of its employees represented by the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 256 (ATU or Union).1 I concluded that the Department of Labor could not certify that SacRTD would preserve and continue the pension rights and benefits of ATU-represented employees under SacRTD's existing collective bargaining agreement with ATU, as required by 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b)(2)(A). I also concluded that the Department could not certify that SacRTD would continue collective bargain
Washington, D.C. 20210Full Funding Grant Agreement • August 12th, 2015
Contract Type FiledAugust 12th, 2015This letter is a further reply to the request from your office that we review the above-captioned application for a grant under section 13(c) of the Urban Mass Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 1609(c) (1964), now codified as part of the Federal Transit Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b). On September 4, 2013, I sent you the Department of Labor's final determination concerning Sacramento Regional Transit District's (SacRTD's) ability to preserve and continue, consistent with section 13(c), the pension benefits and collective bargaining rights of its employees represented by the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 256 (ATU or Union).1 I concluded that the Department of Labor could not certify that SacRTD would preserve and continue the pension rights and benefits of ATU-represented employees under SacRTD's existing collective bargaining agreement with ATU, as required by 49 U.S.C. § 5333(b)(2)(A). I also concluded that the Department could not certify that SacRTD would continue collective bargain