Innovative Micro Technology, Inc. INVESTORS’ RIGHTS AGREEMENT Dated as of January 25, 2005Investors’ Rights Agreement • February 16th, 2005 • Miramar Venture Partners, LP • Electronic components, nec • California
Contract Type FiledFebruary 16th, 2005 Company Industry JurisdictionThis INVESTORS’ RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made as of January 25, 2005, between Innovative Micro Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on the one hand, and the investors listed on Schedule I of this Agreement (the “Investors”) on the other.
Innovative Micro Technology, Inc. Right of First Refusal and Co-Sale AgreementRight of First Refusal and Co-Sale Agreement • February 16th, 2005 • Miramar Venture Partners, LP • Electronic components, nec • California
Contract Type FiledFebruary 16th, 2005 Company Industry Jurisdiction
Innovative Micro Technology, Inc. Voting AgreementVoting Agreement • February 16th, 2005 • Miramar Venture Partners, LP • Electronic components, nec • California
Contract Type FiledFebruary 16th, 2005 Company Industry Jurisdiction
Joint Filing AgreementJoint Filing Agreement • February 16th, 2005 • Miramar Venture Partners, LP • Electronic components, nec
Contract Type FiledFebruary 16th, 2005 Company IndustryThe undersigned agree to file jointly with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) any and all statements on Schedule 13D (and any amendments or supplements thereto) required under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with transactions by the undersigned in the Common Stock of Innovative Micro Technology, Inc. Each of the undersigned will be responsible for the timely filing of the Schedule 13D and all amendments thereto, and for the completeness and accuracy of the information concerning such party contained therein. None of the undersigned shall be responsible for the completeness or accuracy of the information concerning any other party contained in the Schedule 13D or any amendment thereto, except to the extent such person knows or has reason to believe that such information is inaccurate.