ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ON CONSENT FOR REMOVAL ACTIONAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • October 17th, 2017
Contract Type FiledOctober 17th, 2017
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • February 28th, 2020
Contract Type FiledFebruary 28th, 2020IN THE MATTER OF: ))) U.S. EPA Region 10CERCLA Docket No. 10-2009-0255 Portland Harbor Superfund Site Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon )))) ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ON CONSENT FOR REMOVAL ACTION NW Natural, an Oregon Corporation Respondent Proceedings Under Sections 104, 107, and 122 of the Comprehensive, Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604, 9607 and 9622 ))))))))) AMENDMENT NO. 2 FOR REMEDIAL DESIGN AT B1 NAVIGATION CHANNEL PROJECT AREA AND U.S. MOORINGS PROJECT AREA
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IIIAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • September 29th, 2023
Contract Type FiledSeptember 29th, 2023Re: North Penn Area 6 Superfund Site, Former Precision Rebuilding Corp. Property, 422 West Sixth St, Lansdale, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania - Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action, Docket No. CERCLA-03-2023-0007DC
IN THE MATTER OF: ) ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ON CONSENT FOR REMOVAL ACTIONAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • May 5th, 2020
Contract Type FiledMay 5th, 2020
ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ON CONSENT FOR REMOVAL ACTIONAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • May 22nd, 2018
Contract Type FiledMay 22nd, 2018
ContractAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • September 10th, 2020
Contract Type FiledSeptember 10th, 2020This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/11/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20084, and on govinfo.gov
ContractAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • September 21st, 2020
Contract Type FiledSeptember 21st, 2020This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/22/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20813, and on govinfo.gov
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • April 4th, 2016
Contract Type FiledApril 4th, 2016Re: River Mile (RM) 10.9 SPME Sampling – Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action CERCLA Docket No. 02-2012-2025 (Agreement)
IN THE MATTER OF: ) ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ON CONSENT FOR REMOVAL ACTIONAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • October 1st, 2015
Contract Type FiledOctober 1st, 2015
ContractAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • March 8th, 2016
Contract Type FiledMarch 8th, 2016
ADMINISTRATIVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER ON CONSENT FOR REMOVAL ACTIONAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • October 28th, 2020
Contract Type FiledOctober 28th, 2020
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/21/2017 and available online atAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • September 20th, 2017
Contract Type FiledSeptember 20th, 2017Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action for the Cordero-McDermitt Calcine Pile Site, McDermitt, Nevada AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYAdministrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Removal Action • May 14th, 2014
Contract Type FiledMay 14th, 2014This responds to your letter dated May 9, 2014 submitted on behalf of the Cooperating Parties Group (CPG), which provided notice to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that a force majeure event, consisting of the inoperative condition of the Jackson Street Bridge (Bridge) between April 29, 2014 and May 9, 2014. EPA accepts that delay caused by the inoperative condition of the Bridge, as stated in your May 9, 2014 letter, was attributable to a force majeure event.