AREA MASTER AGREEMENTArea Master Agreement • July 8th, 2019 • Washington
THIS AGREEMENT is a Successive Principle Agreement to the Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho Carpenters 2016 – 2019 Agreement and all other prior Agreements thereto by and between the above named parties (or their predecessor organizations) .
MONTANA CONTRACTORS GROUPArea Master Agreement • July 19th, 2018
STATE OF MONTANA AREA MASTER AGREEMENTArea Master Agreement • July 24th, 2021
THIS AGREEMENT is a Successive Principal Agreement to the State of Montana Area Master Agreement and all other prior Agreements thereto by and between the above-named parties (or their predecessor organizations) and any other applicable Agreement within the state of Montana negotiated between an Independent Contractor or Contractor Group and the PNWRCC.
AREA MASTER AGREEMENTArea Master Agreement • July 21st, 2022
THIS AGREEMENT is a Successive Principle Agreement to the Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho Carpenters 2019 – 2022 Agreement and all other prior Agreements thereto by and between the above-named parties (or their predecessor organizations).
image(A picture containing text Description automatically generated) removed ..>Area Master Agreement • July 29th, 2021
Your Western & Central Washington Bargaining Team reached another Tentative Agreement (T/A) with the AGC of Washington for the Area Master Agreement on Wednesday, July 28thth. The committee is comprised of rank- and-file members and NWCU staff. With the second Tentative Agreement failing at 52% "NO" votes by the membership, the parties have agreed and executed a two-week extension through August 13th. The big change from the last T/A to this T/A is the uncertainty we have heard surrounding Wage and Fringe allocations, specifically the paragraph that included the "Distribution of Monies" nestled below the Schedule "A." The union took the feedback from the last ratification vote, and your bargaining team decided not to advance with that new language in the current Tentative Agreement. Many members feel like the distributions set forth in the schedule A were misleading and would be changed at any given time, which was never the intent. We completely understand the perception and confusion
