Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for the Texas Hornshell (Popenaias popeii) and other Covered Species Developed cooperatively by: The Center of Excellence (CEHMM)Candidate Conservation Agreement • January 30th, 2022
Contract Type FiledJanuary 30th, 2022
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE UPPER BIG HOLE RIVERCandidate Conservation Agreement • February 23rd, 2007
Contract Type FiledFebruary 23rd, 2007
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE UPPER BIG HOLE RIVERCandidate Conservation Agreement • May 6th, 2010
Contract Type FiledMay 6th, 2010
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for theCandidate Conservation Agreement • June 20th, 2018
Contract Type FiledJune 20th, 2018
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR THE SPRING PYGMY SUNFISH BETWEENCandidate Conservation Agreement • October 17th, 2013
Contract Type FiledOctober 17th, 2013
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKENSCandidate Conservation Agreement • January 30th, 2013
Contract Type FiledJanuary 30th, 2013
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENTCandidate Conservation Agreement • June 7th, 2011
Contract Type FiledJune 7th, 2011
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE CENTENNIAL VALLEY, MONTANACandidate Conservation Agreement • September 18th, 2018
Contract Type FiledSeptember 18th, 2018Arctic grayling were historically widespread but patchily distributed throughout the upper Missouri River basin above Great Falls, Montana. Distribution and abundance of Arctic grayling in the basin has declined since the late 1800s in response to land use changes and natural factors. This decline led to formal consideration for listing Arctic grayling under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the 1990s. Conservation efforts by federal and state agencies, private landowners and conservation groups have improved the resiliency, redundancy, and representation of Arctic grayling over the past 30 years. As a result, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) determined Arctic grayling were not warranted for protection under the ESA in 2014. However, Arctic grayling remain a Species of Concern in Montana (Montana State Wildlife Action Plan 2105), and conservation efforts continue to be a focus of resource agencies, non-governmental conservation organization, and private landowners.
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for the Texas Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys elator)Candidate Conservation Agreement • August 10th, 2022
Contract Type FiledAugust 10th, 2022
Candidate Conservation Agreement (CCA) for theCandidate Conservation Agreement • July 12th, 2013
Contract Type FiledJuly 12th, 2013
Appendix I – AMENDMENT: June 2022.Candidate Conservation Agreement • September 23rd, 2022
Contract Type FiledSeptember 23rd, 2022Amendment to the Candidate Conservation Agreement (CCA) and Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA) for Lesser Prairie-Chicken (LPC) and Sand Dune Lizard (SDL), also known as the Dunes sagebrush lizard (DSL), in New Mexico, dated December 8, 2008.
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus arenicolus)Candidate Conservation Agreement • January 19th, 2021
Contract Type FiledJanuary 19th, 2021
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR SIX SPECIES IN THECandidate Conservation Agreement • January 30th, 2024
Contract Type FiledJanuary 30th, 2024
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCESCandidate Conservation Agreement • February 4th, 2002
Contract Type FiledFebruary 4th, 2002
Candidate Conservation AgreementCandidate Conservation Agreement • February 18th, 2016 • North Carolina
Contract Type FiledFebruary 18th, 2016 Jurisdiction
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE UPPER BIG HOLE RIVERCandidate Conservation Agreement • June 23rd, 2021
Contract Type FiledJune 23rd, 2021
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKENSCandidate Conservation Agreement • November 3rd, 2020
Contract Type FiledNovember 3rd, 2020
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT FOR THECandidate Conservation Agreement • December 1st, 2017
Contract Type FiledDecember 1st, 2017
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR THE PAGE SPRINGSNAIL (PYRGULOPSIS MORRISONI)Candidate Conservation Agreement • October 13th, 2009
Contract Type FiledOctober 13th, 2009This Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA), effective and binding on the date of last signature below, is between Arizona Game and Fish Department and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service:
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR THE SPRING PYGMY SUNFISH BETWEEN BELLE MINACandidate Conservation Agreement • February 21st, 2012
Contract Type FiledFebruary 21st, 2012
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances andCandidate Conservation Agreement • January 8th, 2013
Contract Type FiledJanuary 8th, 2013This Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA) and Candidate Conservation Agreement (CCA) is a combined document (the Agreement or CCAA/CCA) developed in partnership by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and the Thunder Basin Grasslands Prairie Ecosystem Association–a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization (Association). The Agreement will serve as the landscape-scale umbrella document for conservation measures to be administered by the Association and implemented by its members. A partial framework and precedent for this approach is found in the combined Candidate Conservation Agreement and Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances for the Lesser Prairie-Chicken and Sand Dune Lizard developed cooperatively by the FWS, BLM, and Center of Excellence for Hazardous Materials Management dated December 8, 2008. The Agreement also draws on
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances forCandidate Conservation Agreement • April 8th, 2005
Contract Type FiledApril 8th, 2005
CANDIATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES [insert title of the CCAA]Candidate Conservation Agreement • July 8th, 2015
Contract Type FiledJuly 8th, 2015This CCAA, effective and binding on the date of last signature below, is between [insert name of Participating Property owner], [insert name of any other Cooperators such as county, State or Federal agencies, or conservation entity] (Cooperators), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service):
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances forCandidate Conservation Agreement • April 8th, 2005
Contract Type FiledApril 8th, 2005This Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA) effective and binding on the date of the last signature below, is between the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) and the
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE CENTENNIAL VALLEY, MONTANACandidate Conservation Agreement • May 30th, 2024
Contract Type FiledMay 30th, 2024Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks: Andy Brummond, Katelin Killoy, Cassandra Kohler, Lucas Bateman, Matt Jaeger, Ryan Kreiner, & Tim Gander
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE UPPER BIG HOLE RIVERCandidate Conservation Agreement • September 14th, 2017
Contract Type FiledSeptember 14th, 2017Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks: Emily Cayer & Austin McCullough USFWS Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program: Jim Magee USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service: Kyle Tackett
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE CENTENNIAL VALLEY, MONTANACandidate Conservation Agreement • April 7th, 2022
Contract Type FiledApril 7th, 2022
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE UPPER BIG HOLE RIVERCandidate Conservation Agreement • April 17th, 2009
Contract Type FiledApril 17th, 2009
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances forCandidate Conservation Agreement • April 3rd, 2007
Contract Type FiledApril 3rd, 2007This Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA) effective and binding on the date of the last signature below, is between the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) and the
Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances forCandidate Conservation Agreement • July 5th, 2017
Contract Type FiledJuly 5th, 2017This Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA or Agreement), effective and binding on the date of the last signature below, is between the New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands (Commissioner) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) (referred to herein as “Party” or “Parties”). This CCAA is an umbrella agreement under which lessees or grantees of state trust lands1 (collectively herein referred to as “Lessees,” “Participants,” or “Participating Lessees”) can participate in and receive the benefits of the CCAA by signing a Certificate of Inclusion, subject to approval by the Commissioner and concurrence by the Service.
Candidate Conservation AgreementCandidate Conservation Agreement • February 8th, 2017
Contract Type FiledFebruary 8th, 2017
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT FOR THECandidate Conservation Agreement • December 5th, 2023
Contract Type FiledDecember 5th, 2023Adult male eastern regal fritillary on a butterfly weed plant. Photo Credit: Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING IN THE UPPER BIG HOLE RIVERCandidate Conservation Agreement • May 30th, 2024
Contract Type FiledMay 30th, 2024
Programmatic Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA) for the FisherCandidate Conservation Agreement • February 2nd, 2016
Contract Type FiledFebruary 2nd, 2016
CANDIDATE CONSERVATION AGREEMENT WITH ASSURANCES FOR SIX SPECIES IN THECandidate Conservation Agreement • January 30th, 2024
Contract Type FiledJanuary 30th, 2024