CAMBRIE CELESTE LLC AND CAMBRIE CELESTE COMMERCIAL TENANT,LLCCourt Appeal • September 5th, 2023
(Court composed of Chief Judge James F. McKay, III, Judge Terri F. Love, Judge Rosemary Ledet, Judge Regina Bartholomew Woods, Judge Terrel J. Broussard, Pro Tempore)
IN THE COURT OF APPEALCourt Appeal • February 5th, 2015
Martin Mann QC, with him Adrian Francis and Colin McKie, Solicitor Advocate, instructed by Maples & Calder of The British Virgin Islands and Winston & Straun of London for the Appellant
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSCourt Appeal • November 5th, 2012
PAUL A. BONIN JUDGECourt Appeal • July 8th, 2023
Because their due process rights were violated, the trial court should have granted the defendants’ motion for new trial. “A new trial shall be granted … [w]hen the verdict or judgment appears clearly contrary to the law and the
IN THE COURT OF APPEALCourt Appeal • February 19th, 2021
MANITOBA FEDERATION OF LABOUR (IN ITS OWN RIGHT AND ON BEHALF OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO DEFEND PUBLIC SERVICES), THE MANITOBA GOVERNMENT AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES’ UNION, THE MANITOBA NURSES’ UNION, THE MANITOBA TEACHERS’ SOCIETY, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCALS 2034, 2085, AND 435, MANITOBA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 832, UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY ASSOCIATION, CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES NATIONAL, ASSOCIATION OF EMPLOYEES SUPPORTING EDUCATION SERVICES, GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 979, OPERATING ENGINEERS OF MANITOBA LOCAL 987, THE PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA, PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA, UNIFOR, LEGAL AID LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCALS 7975, 7106, 9074, and 8223, WINNIPEG ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICERS IFPTE LOCAL 162, THE UNITED ASSOCI
ON APPEAL FOR THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ONTARIO)Court Appeal • September 11th, 2017
COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS IN THE COURT OF APPEALCourt Appeal • May 1st, 2023
On 25 May 2021, the applicant's request to set aside a judgment entered against her in Default of Appearance was dismissed in the Supreme Court. The applicant filed a Notice of Motion seeking leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal, alleging that the judge made several errors, including not accurately reflecting the procedural rules in dealing with the issue of delay in setting aside a regular judgment entered in default of appearance and neglecting to consider whether justice could have been served by setting aside the judgment in default of appearance on specific terms. The applicant also sought an extension of time within which to bring the appeal. On 23 January 2023, the Court heard the parties and reserved its decision.
ON APPEAL FOR THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ONTARIO)Court Appeal • September 11th, 2017
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND C.A. 297/ 92Court Appeal • December 22nd, 2021
provision for the recognition of Maori fishing rights secured by the Treaty of Waitangi”. The Act provided that quota totalling 10% of the total allowable commercial catches for all species then subject to the QMS should be transferred by the Crown to the Maori Fisheries Commission created under that Act in instalments over the period to
COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS IN THE COURT OF APPEALCourt Appeal • April 15th, 2024
APPEARANCES: Mrs. Gail Lockhart-Charles, KC, with Ms. Candice Knowles and Ms. Tracy Wells, Counsel for Old Fort Bay Company Limited and New Providence Development Company Limited
IN THE COURT OF APPEALCourt Appeal • August 3rd, 2011
Mr. G. Delzin and Ms. A. Goddard for Anthony Murray, Ocean Investments Limited, Ocean View Enterprises Limited and Sandpiper Resort Limited.
CAJUN CONTI LLC, CAJUN CUISINE 1 LLC, AND CAJUN CUISINE LLC D/B/A OCEANA GRILLCourt Appeal • June 25th, 2022
(Court composed of Chief Judge Terri F. Love, Judge Roland L. Belsome, Judge Joy Cossich Lobrano, Judge Sandra Cabrina Jenkins, Judge Pro Tempore Lynn M. Luker)
IN THE COURT OF APPEALCourt Appeal • August 19th, 2022
MANITOBA FEDERATION OF LABOUR (IN ITS OWN RIGHT AND ON BEHALF OF THE PARTNERSHIP TO DEFEND PUBLIC SERVICES), THE MANITOBA GOVERNMENT AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES’ UNION, THE MANITOBA NURSES’ UNION, THE MANITOBA TEACHERS’ SOCIETY, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCALS 2034, 2085, AND 435, MANITOBA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL 832, UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY ASSOCIATION, CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES NATIONAL, ASSOCIATION OF EMPLOYEES SUPPORTING EDUCATION SERVICES, GENERAL TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 979, OPERATING ENGINEERS OF MANITOBA LOCAL 987, THE PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA, PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA, UNIFOR, LEGAL AID LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCALS 7975, 7106, 9074, and 8223, WINNIPEG ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE OFFICERS IFPTE LOCAL 162, THE UNITED ASSOCI
