PENTIUM (BVI) LTDCourt Judgment • June 24th, 2013
Mr. Stephen Moverley Smith QC and Mr. Oliver Clifton for the Appellant Mr. Jeffrey Elkinson and Mr. Richard Evans for the Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORECourt Judgment • May 30th, 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICECourt Judgment • May 27th, 2014
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA58/2020[2021] NZCA 303Court Judgment • July 9th, 2021
BETWEEN MICHAEL DOUGLAS ROBERTSAppellant AND JULES CONSULTANCY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)First Respondent AND JULES LELOIRSecond Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDCourt Judgment • September 14th, 2010
BETWEEN GLADWEN FRANCES MCINTYRE, HELEN JEANNETTE CAMPBELL AND BRIAN RICHARD SMYTHE BEING THE TRUSTEES OF THE GLADWEN FRANCES MCINTYRE FAMILY TRUSTAppellants AND NEMESIS DBK LTD A DULY INCORPORATED COMPANY AND ANTHONY GILBERT STALLARD AND WILLIAM ALEXANDER COOK BEING THE TRUSTEES AND EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ALEC HASTWELLRespondents Hearing: 24 February 2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDCourt Judgment • March 24th, 2020
BETWEEN CAMERON JOHN SLATERFirst Appellant SOCIAL MEDIA CONSULTANTS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)Second Appellant AND MATTHEW JOHN BLOMFIELDRespondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDCourt Judgment • December 7th, 2009
BETWEEN JACKSON MEWS MANAGEMENTLIMITED Appellant AND JANICE MARY MENERE, RUPERT OLIVER SMITH AND KELLEE ANN MENERERespondents Hearing: 5 May 2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA161/01Court Judgment • June 14th, 2023
[1] This case concerns the C & D landfill situated in Happy Valley, Wellington. Two issues arise. The first, which is of general significance, concerns the ambit of the Environment Court’s discretionary power to make declarations under s313 of the
JUDGMENT OF THE COURTCourt Judgment • June 4th, 2024
A The application for an extension of time to file a case on appeal and apply for the allocation of a hearing date is granted. The case on appeal is to be filed within 20 working days of this judgment.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA601/2021[2023] NZCA 196Court Judgment • May 25th, 2023
BETWEEN SHEARING SERVICES KAMUPENE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)Appellant AND TARAHAU FARMING LIMITEDFirst Respondent RIO GREENINGSecond Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA775/2013 [2015] NZCA 62Court Judgment • March 17th, 2015
BETWEEN WATERFRONT PROPERTIES (2009) LIMITEDAppellant AND LIGHTER QUAY RESIDENTS' SOCIETY INCORPORATEDFirst Respondent BODY CORPORATE 326496 (NORTH AT LIGHTER QUAY)Second Respondent BODY CORPORATE 343562 (STRATIS AT LIGHTER QUAY)Third Respondent BODY CORPORATE 358939 (HALSEY AT LIGHTER QUAY)Fourth Respondent BRUCE GRAY QCFifth Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA601/2021[2023] NZCA 196Court Judgment • May 25th, 2023
BETWEEN SHEARING SERVICES KAMUPENE LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)Appellant AND TARAHAU FARMING LIMITEDFirst Respondent RIO GREENINGSecond Respondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA158/2017 [2017] NZCA 607Court Judgment • January 4th, 2018
BETWEEN NORTHLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATEDAppellant AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIESFirst Respondent COMPTROLLER OF CUSTOMSSecond Respondent THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY FOR CULTURE AND HERITAGEThird Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICECourt Judgment • January 26th, 2018
and-Court Judgment • October 29th, 2020
DARON ANDREW WILLIAMSCourt Judgment • November 14th, 2016
Table of Contents Page No. Background 3 Disposition 3 Case for the Claimant 5 Case for the First Defendant 10 Case for the Second Defendant 16 Ancillary Claim of the Second Defendant 19 Findings of Fact- The Pleaded Case 19 Duty and Causation 24 Breach of Duty 32 Contribution 33 The Ancillary Claim 34
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA45/2020[2021] NZCA 21Court Judgment • March 4th, 2021
BETWEEN HELILOGGING LIMITED(IN RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION)First Appellant AND MARK WAYNE FORD AS TRUSTEE OF THE WESSEX TRUSTSecond Appellant AND CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF NEW ZEALANDRespondent
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDCourt Judgment • July 20th, 2022
B The Environment Court must reconsider the appellants’ appeal to it in light of the High Court’s reasoning, in so far as that reasoning has been approved by this court, and, in particular, must assess the appropriate term of the consents:
ST. KITTS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONCourt Judgment • October 28th, 2009
[1] RAWLINS, J.A. [AG.]: This is an appeal from an Order that Baptiste J made on 8th October 2004. In that Order, he directed that the assessment of damages on the judgment that he delivered on 7th September 2004 in favour of the Appellant, Golfview, should be conducted only on the evidence already adduced at the trial.
AND CHAMPS ELYSEES LIMITEDCourt Judgment • January 18th, 2022
Mr Keith Scotland and Mr Kirk Bengochea instructed by Ms Karina Dookie Attorneys at law for the Claimant, the First Ancillary Defendant and the Second Ancillary Defendant.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICECourt Judgment • July 3rd, 2014
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA608/2012 [2014] NZCA 578Court Judgment • December 4th, 2014
BETWEEN GRANT BRUCE REYNOLDS AS THE LIQUIDATOR OF JAMES DEVELOPMENTS LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)Appellant AND CHRIS JAMESRespondent
MR JUSTICE SWIFTCourt Judgment • May 7th, 2019
MATT HUTCHINGS QC (instructed by Simons Muirhead & Burton LLP)for the Claimant PHILIP COPPEL QC & ASITHA RANATUNGA (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the Defendant
IN THE FULL COURT OF QUEENSLAND W. No. 1414 of 1975Court Judgment • February 27th, 2024
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALANDCourt Judgment • December 13th, 2021
BETWEEN BELLA VISTA RESORT LIMITED &BELLA VISTA PROPERTIES LIMITED Appellants AND WESTERN BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT COUNCILRespondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICECourt Judgment • April 26th, 2022
Claimant: Mr. A. Fitzpatrick SC, Mr. S. Sharma and Mr. R. Kawalsingh instructed by Mr. J. Mohammed. Defendant/Ancillary Claimant: Mr. J. A. Davis QC, Mr. G. Hayman QC and Mr. C. Kangaloo instructed by Ms. D. Nieves-Inglefield.
THE HIGH COURTCourt Judgment • November 23rd, 2020
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEENCourt Judgment • October 6th, 2010
THE HIGH COURTCourt Judgment • March 31st, 2021
IN THE COURT OF APPEALCourt Judgment • April 30th, 2003
ContractCourt Judgment • June 10th, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALANDAUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2009-404-002786 BETWEEN WALTER PEAK DEVELOPMENTS LTD (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION)Plaintiff AND THOMAS MILLARDefendant CIV-2009-404-8041 AND IN THE MATTER OF the Insolvency Act 2006AND IN THE MATTER OF the bankruptcy of THOMAS MILLAR BETWEEN WALTER PEAK DEVELOPMENTS LTD (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND IN LIQUIDATION)Judgment Creditor AND THOMAS MILLARJudgment Debtor Hearing: 9 May 2011 Appearances: D T Broadmore for PlaintiffA M Swan for Defendant Judgment: 9 May 2011
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA646/2015 [2017] NZCA 196Court Judgment • May 30th, 2017
BETWEEN HELI-LOGGING LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND IN LIQUIDATION)First Appellant AND MARK WAYNE FORD IN HIS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE WESSEX TRUSTSecond Appellant AND MARK WAYNE FORDThird Appellant AND CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF NEW ZEALANDRespondent
