RE: West River Dakota Dome Enabling Agreement Dear Mr. Mehrer:Enabling Agreement • June 19th, 2006
Contract Type FiledJune 19th, 2006You have asked for my approval of a document entitled "Enabling Agreement for West River Dakota Dome" pursuant to N.D.C.C. ch. 54-40. The agreement is for the establishment and operation of a regional multipurpose facility known as West River Dakota Dome. Funds to build the facility are to come from both private and public sources with the state contributing the land to the project. The dome is to be built with these funds and then, presumably, the state will "accept" ownership of the dome at some point in the future and manage it. Authority to accept the facility was granted by the Legislature in 1983. 1983 N.D. Sess. Laws ch. 189.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO ENABLING AGREEMENT (CHELAN/CITY OF ELLENSBURG)Enabling Agreement • December 23rd, 2019
Contract Type FiledDecember 23rd, 2019ELLENSBURG) (“Second Amendment”) is executed by and between Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County, Washington (the “District”), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, and City of Ellensburg (“Ellensburg”), a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of Washington. The District and Ellensburg are referred to as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
PURPOSEEnabling Agreement • November 14th, 2019
Contract Type FiledNovember 14th, 2019Outline the scope of work for the new enabling agreement (EA) for the provision of Maintenance and Support of existing SAP Licenses and Services.
ScheduleEnabling Agreement • March 8th, 1999
Contract Type FiledMarch 8th, 1999State of Western Australia acting for and on behalf of the State of Western Australia and its instrumentalities from time to time (“the state”) of the first part
ENABLING AGREEMENT FOR ACCESS BYEnabling Agreement • March 21st, 2014
Contract Type FiledMarch 21st, 2014
SCHEDULE 18 – ENABLING AGREEMENT FOR SOLUTION 4 ENABLING AGREEMENTEnabling Agreement • May 7th, 2021
Contract Type FiledMay 7th, 2021
RE: West River Dakota Dome Enabling Agreement Dear Mr. Mehrer:Enabling Agreement • June 19th, 2006
Contract Type FiledJune 19th, 2006You have asked for my approval of a document entitled "Enabling Agreement for West River Dakota Dome" pursuant to N.D.C.C. ch. 54-40. The agreement is for the establishment and operation of a regional multipurpose facility known as West River Dakota Dome. Funds to build the facility are to come from both private and public sources with the state contributing the land to the project. The dome is to be built with these funds and then, presumably, the state will "accept" ownership of the dome at some point in the future and manage it. Authority to accept the facility was granted by the Legislature in 1983. 1983 N.D. Sess. Laws ch. 189.
ContractEnabling Agreement • October 8th, 2001
Contract Type FiledOctober 8th, 2001
Western Australian Current Acts [Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Download] [Help] FORREST PLACE AND CITY STATION DEVELOPMENT ACT 1985 - SCHEDULE [s. 3] [Heading amended: No. 19 of 2010 s. 4.] THIS ENABLING...Enabling Agreement • May 5th, 2020
Contract Type FiledMay 5th, 2020THE HONOURABLE BRIAN THOMAS BURKE M.L.A. Premier of the State of Western Australia acting for and on behalf of the State of Western Australia and its instrumentalities from time to time (“the State”) of the first part
SCHEDULE 18 – ENABLING AGREEMENT FOR SOLUTION 4 ENABLING AGREEMENTEnabling Agreement • August 23rd, 2019
Contract Type FiledAugust 23rd, 2019
OFFICIAL SENSITIVEEnabling Agreement • March 5th, 2024
Contract Type FiledMarch 5th, 2024
ContractEnabling Agreement • October 9th, 2024
Contract Type FiledOctober 9th, 2024The Enabling Agreement (EA) in the parastatal industry of South Africa argues that the single- choice information technology service provider will have ‘first right of refusal’ over all information technology services required by its final customers. The implication of this agreement is that service users in the parastatal industry can only engage the services of other service providers if the newly established single-choice information technology service provider is unable to provide the services required, or if it specifically refuses to perform work requested, or if agreements with other service providers existed prior to the formation of the newly formed service provider.