Agreement No. CE 57/2005(EP)Environmental Impact Assessment • September 20th, 2010
EIARef. EM&ARef. Environmental Protection Measures* Location / Timing Implementation Agent ImplementationStage** Relevant Legislation and Guidelines Implementation Status D C O Air Quality – Construction Phase 3.7.1 2.8 In order to minimize the nuisance to the nearby ASRs, it is important to minimize dust emissions from construction activities. In 1997, the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation came into effect to control dust emission from construction works. Appropriate dust control measures should be implemented during construction stage in accordance with the requirements in the Air Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation. Dust control techniques should be considered to control dust to a level not exceeding the AQOs as well as the 1-hour TSP guideline level of 500 µg/m³. These measures include, but not limited to, as follows: • Adoption of good site practices;• Avoid practices likely to raise dust level;• Frequent cleaning and damping down of stockpiles an
Appendix 11.5 Derivation of Heat Re-circulation FactorEnvironmental Impact Assessment • September 14th, 2021
It is assumed that all cooling water discharges have an excess temperature with reference to the ambient water temperature. The value of excess temperature will be based on the design temperature load for the proposed cooling system. Theoretically, the potential short circuit problem of the recirculation of heated water to the cooling water intake should be taken into account by conducting a series of model runs. The first run should be simulated with an excess temperature specified at the spent cooling water outfalls and the second run should be simulated with the specified excess temperature plus the temperature elevation at the intakes predicted in the first-run. More simulations should be iterated with the temperature elevation at the intakes plus temperature at the outfall to reproduce the potential build-up of heat recirculation, until the results converge. Assuming that the temperature elevation at intake is proportional to that at cooling water discharge, the temperature elevat
Agreement CE 63/2008 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • July 21st, 2010
Figure 2.1a General Layout of Submarine Outfall Works Figure 2.2 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2000 Figure 2.3 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2001 Figure 2.4 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2002 Figure 2.5 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2003 Figure 2.6 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2004 Figure 2.7 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2005 Figure 2.8 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2006 Figure 2.9 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2007 Figure 2.10 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2008 Figure 2.11 Sounding Data for Area A from MD 2009 Figure 2.12 Sounding Data for Area A from EGS 2009 Figure 2.13 Siltation Map for Area A 2003 - 2009
Agreement No. CE 17/2019 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • May 19th, 2022
Predicted Pollutant Concentrations at Assessment Locations Operation Phase Base Case (Model ID: B) ASR Description Height (mAG) NO2 RSP FSP 19th Highest Hourly Averaged Conc.(µg/m3) Annual Averaged Conc.(µg/m3) 10th Highest Daily Averaged Conc.(µg/m3) Annual Averaged Conc.(µg/m3) 36th Highest Daily Averaged Conc.(µg/m3) 19th Highest Daily Averaged Conc.(µg/m3) Annual Averaged Conc.(µg/m3) AQO Standard 200 40 100 50 50 50 25 AM21_01500 Little Sisters of the Poor Saint Joseph’s Home for the Aged 15.0 107.6 17.1 65.0 27.3 25.3 36.1 15.7 AM21_02000 Little Sisters of the Poor Saint Joseph’s Home for the Aged 20.0 106.5 16.1 64.9 27.3 25.3 36.1 15.7 AM31_00150 Buddhist Li Chong Yuen Ming Nursing Home for The Elderly 1.5 130.4 23.5 78.0 39.6 25.8 35.9 16.2 AM31_00500 Buddhist Li Chong Yuen Ming Nursing Home for The Elderly 5.0 129.5 21.4 77.9 39.3 25.7 35.8 16.1 AM31_01000 Buddhist Li Chong Yuen Ming Nursing Home for The Elderly 10.0 124.6 18.7 74.7 37.0 25.6 35.8 16.0 AM31_01500 Buddhi
Item No. Common Name Scientific Name Chinese Name Conservation Status1 Commonness2 Habitat3500m Assesment Area Project Area (Aboveground) MWL FSW PL S/G WC RE AL DA MWL PL S/G WC DA 1 Chinese Noctule Nyctalus plancyi 中華山蝠 Cap.170;Fellowes: PRC (RC)...Environmental Impact Assessment • September 29th, 2023
Agreement No. CE 87/2001 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • February 5th, 2022
Agreement CE 63/2008 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • July 23rd, 2010
Agreement No. CE 17/2019 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • May 19th, 2022
AGREEMENT NO. CE 73/98 INVESTIGATION ASSIGNMENT FOREnvironmental Impact Assessment • May 25th, 2000
ContractEnvironmental Impact Assessment • July 19th, 2018
Agreement No. CE 54/2015 (EP) Lei Yue Mun Waterfront Enhancement Project – Environmental and Traffic Impact Assessment Studies - Investigation
Agreement No. CE 74/98Environmental Impact Assessment • July 11th, 2001
Agreement No. CE 17/2019 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • May 19th, 2022
Agreement No. CE14/2014 (HY)Environmental Impact Assessment • June 19th, 2015
Environmental Impact Assessment and Drainage Impact Assessment - Investigation Appendix 4B - Unmitigated Sound Power Level of Construction Activities
Agreement CE 63/2008 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • July 23rd, 2010
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.
Incense Tree (Aquilaria sinensis) Hong Kong Eagle's Claw(Artabotrys hongkongensis) Butulang Canthium (Canthium dicoccum) Lamb of Tartary (Cibotium barometz) Small Persimmon (Diospyros vaccinioides) Luofushan Joint-fir (Gnetum luofuense) Agreement No....Environmental Impact Assessment • August 10th, 2021
Agreement No. CE 57/2005(EP)Environmental Impact Assessment • January 26th, 2010
Integration of Siu Ho Wan and Silver Mine Bay Water Treatment Works - FINAL EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - Investigation 382715/B&V/0040/Issue 1
Agreement No. CE 57/2005(EP)Environmental Impact Assessment • January 26th, 2010
Integration for Siu Ho Wan and Silver Mine Bay Water Treatment Works - FINAL EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - Investigation 382715/B&V/0040/Issue 1
Agreement No. CE 87/2001 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • August 1st, 2005
GEF上海农业和非点源污染减少项目环境影响评价Environmental Impact Assessment • August 25th, 2009
ContractEnvironmental Impact Assessment • January 9th, 2009
Client: Civil Engineering and Development Department Contract No. (if any): Agreement No.: NTN 5/06 Project Title: Construction of Cycle Tracks and the Associated Supporting Facilities from Sha Po Tsuen to Shek Sheung River – Environmental Impact Assessment Project No.: 4082 Document No.: 4082-OR037-01 Controlled Copy No.: Document Title: Executive Summary (English and Chinese) Covering Letter/Transmittal Ref. No.: 4082/OG092/Elt17552/SB/ww Date of Issue: 24 December 2008
Item No. Common Name Scientific Name Chinese Name Conservation and Rarity in Hong Kong2 Distribution in Hong Kong3 Habitat4/5Protection Status1 500m Assesment Area Project Area (Aboveground) MWL FSW PL S/G WC RE AL DA MWL PL S/G WC DA 1 Asian Common...Environmental Impact Assessment • September 26th, 2023
Agreement No. CE 17/2019 (CE)Environmental Impact Assessment • May 19th, 2022
Predicted Pollutant Concentrations at Assessment Points - Differences of Cumulative Impact Between Operation Phase and Base Case
Agreement No. CE 57/2005(EP)Environmental Impact Assessment • January 26th, 2010
Integration of Siu Ho Wan and Silver Mine Bay Water Treatment Works - FINAL EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - Investigation 382715/B&V/0040/Issue 1
ContractEnvironmental Impact Assessment • December 28th, 2001
Agreement No. CE 98/98 Environmental Impact Assessment Preliminary Design and Ground Investigation for Widening of Final Report Yuen Long Highway Between Lam Tei and Shap Pat Heung Interchange December 2001
Agreement No. CE 57/2005(EP)Environmental Impact Assessment • January 26th, 2010
Integration of Siu Ho Wan and Silver Mine Bay Water Treatment Works - FINAL EIA Environmental Impact Assessment - Investigation 382715/B&V/0040/Issue 1
Environmental Impacts - Toondah Harbour Development ProposalEnvironmental Impact Assessment • April 28th, 2023
The Moreton Bay wetlands are Internationally protected under the Ramsar Convention. This binding agreement has been signed by Australia and 169 other nations, and because we are a signatory, we have committed to maintain the ecological character of Moreton Bay. But this development would put us in contravention of that commitment by causing “permanent and irreversible damage” to the wetlands.
Volume 3A - Appendices (Part 1)Environmental Impact Assessment • August 2nd, 2005
Appendix 3.2 Sensitivity Test for Emission Rates for Year 2031 and Year 2016 Appendix 3.3 Calculations of Emission Factor (Open Road) – Year 2031 Appendix 3.4 Calculations of Emission Factors for Queuing Lanes
Agreement No. CE 87/2001 (CE) FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF TSEUNG KWAN OEnvironmental Impact Assessment • March 15th, 2022
Figure 3.1a Locations of Representative Air Sensitive Receivers (Kowloon Area) Figure 3.1b Locations of Representative Air Sensitive Receivers (TKO Area) Figure 3.2 Locations of Chimneys at Kowloon Area
Agreement No. CE 69/2001 (HY)Environmental Impact Assessment • October 8th, 2008
Tsuen Wan Bypass, Widening of Tsuen Wan Road between Tsuen Tsing Interchange and Kwai Tsing Interchange and Associated Junction Improvement Works
Agreement No. CE 69/2001 (HY)Environmental Impact Assessment • September 8th, 2008
With reference to Clause 3.4 of “Guidelines on Choice of Models and Model parameters in Air Quality Assessment”, in urban areas such as Tsuen Wan, the urban surface roughness height is 370cm. On the other hand, since a large piece of water surface, Rambler Channel, locates at the western side of the study area (see Figure A4-K.1). Refer to “Summary of Meteorological Observations in Hong Kong” from 2002 to 2006 by Hong Kong Observatory, prevailing wind direction of 130 degree was recorded in 2006 at Ching Pak House automatic weather station, which is the nearest station to the Project area. In view of the observation that the prevailing wind direction is in parallel direction to the alignment of the structure, it is deemed that the breezes from seashore and inland are not dominating the flow of air pollutants, and so for their adverse effect on the surrounding potential ASRs. Since the project area is adjacent to both urban area and water surface, a weighted surface roughness with respe
