EFD A EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • March 1st, 2005
Contract Type FiledMarch 1st, 2005
EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • January 5th, 2005
Contract Type FiledJanuary 5th, 2005• Systems code varied the parameters of the possible designs, subject to assigned plasma physics and technology rules and limits, to produce economic optimum.
the Case for ITEREuropean Fusion Development Agreement • July 23rd, 2002
Contract Type FiledJuly 23rd, 2002
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • July 29th, 2004
Contract Type FiledJuly 29th, 2004
The EFDA-TIMES global model: multi- tasking improvement proceduresEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • December 5th, 2005
Contract Type FiledDecember 5th, 2005
ITER as a Physics ExperimentEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • June 17th, 2002
Contract Type FiledJune 17th, 2002heating system stage I possible upgradeby rem arks NB I (1M eV negative ion) 33 16.5‡) vertisaly steerable (› at R tan:–0.4²m to +0.16m ) E G R HB G D (170 fl H ›)(+²M W 1²0 fl H › forstart–up) ²0 ²0 equatorialport B upper port launsher; steerable IG R HB GD (40 – 60 M H ›) ²0 2ΩT(50 pow er to ions),Ω3He(70 to ions);FW G D LH HB GD (5fl H ›) ²0 1.8€n/ € ².² total 73 130 (110sim ultan.) upgrade in different R Fsom binations possible E G R H start–up system (1²0 fl H ›) ² D iagnostis B eam (100 keV H ,neg. ion?) >²
Mathematical Tools for Economic Programming Energy ModelsEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • November 5th, 2004
Contract Type FiledNovember 5th, 2004• Implementation of several economic equilibrium technology explicit models of global, regional, national, local energy systems; and
UROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • July 8th, 2005
Contract Type FiledJuly 8th, 2005
The European Fusion Development AgreementEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • November 19th, 2012
Contract Type FiledNovember 19th, 2012The bulk tungsten divertor is designed for a maximum local temperature of the plasma-facing tungsten of 2200oC and a maximal energy deposition of 60 MJ/m2
SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OFEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • April 25th, 2001
Contract Type FiledApril 25th, 2001Fusion power stations would provide large amounts of base load electric energy, burning deuterium-tritium fuel. An intrinsic characteristic of them, would be the extremely low level of fuel inventory in the burning chamber, and the low levels of after burn heat power density. Obviously, fusion power stations would neither burn nor produce any fissile material. The products of the fusion process itself are benign, so that tritium and the neutron activation of materials would be the only source of potential radiological hazards. With appropriate design, these favourable inherent features can be exploited to provide substantial safety and environmental advantages.
UROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • September 8th, 2004
Contract Type FiledSeptember 8th, 2004
EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • October 23rd, 2022
Contract Type FiledOctober 23rd, 2022
UROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTEuropean Fusion Development Agreement • February 22nd, 2005
Contract Type FiledFebruary 22nd, 2005• Engineering critical current density (and critical current) of the EM-LMI wire as a function of applied strain at a magnetic field of 12 T and at temperatures of 4.2 K and 0.5 K increments between 5 K and