PLEASE READ THIS NOTE CAREFULLY BEFORE STARTING TO USE THE FORMS!Explanatory Note • May 2nd, 2006
EXPLANATORY NOTE ON MUTATIS MUTANDISExplanatory Note • December 30th, 2020
For greater certainty, the Parties agree that “mutatis mutandis” as defined in Article 1 (Definitions and interpretation) of the Agreement refers to necessary modifications as the circumstances require. The following terms shall, save where the context otherwise requires, be interpreted as follows:
EXPLANATORY NOTEExplanatory Note • March 25th, 2019
We refer to Highwoods Properties, Inc. as the “Company,” Highwoods Realty Limited Partnership as the “Operating Partnership,” the Company’s common stock as “Common Stock” or “Common Shares,” the Company’s preferred stock as “Preferred Stock” or “Preferred Shares,” the Operating Partnership’s common partnership interests as “Common Units” and the Operating Partnership’s preferred partnership interests as “Preferred Units." References to “we” and “our” mean the Company and the Operating Partnership, collectively, unless the context indicates otherwise.
Explanatory noteExplanatory Note • November 20th, 2007
Explanatory note on the final criteria for the Aggregation Method comparability assessmentExplanatory Note • March 8th, 2023
In November 2017, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) set out an agreement on the implementation of Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) Version 2.0, including a unified path to convergence of group capital standards in furtherance of its ultimate goal of a single ICS that achieves comparable outcomes across jurisdictions.1 The agreement acknowledges the development by the United States of the Aggregation Method (AM) to a group capital calculation. While the AM is not part of the ICS, the IAIS aims to be in a position by the end of the monitoring period to assess whether the AM provides comparable (ie substantially the same (in the sense of the ultimate goal)) outcomes to the ICS. If so, it will be considered an outcome-equivalent approach for implementation of ICS as a prescribed capital requirement (PCR). At the same time, the IAIS agreed to help collect data from the US and interested jurisdictions that will aid in the development of the AM.
Explanatory note on the draft criteria for the Aggregation Method comparability consultationExplanatory Note • June 15th, 2022
In November 2017, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) set out an agreement on the implementation of Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) Version 2.0, including a unified path to convergence of group capital standards in furtherance of its ultimate goal of a single ICS that achieves comparable outcomes across jurisdictions.1 The agreement acknowledges the development by the United States of the Aggregation Method (AM) to a group capital calculation. While the AM is not part of the ICS, the IAIS aims to be in a position by the end of the monitoring period to assess whether the AM provides comparable (ie substantially the same (in the sense of the ultimate goal)) outcomes to the ICS. If so, it will be considered an outcome-equivalent approach for implementation of ICS as a prescribed capital requirement (PCR). At the same time, the IAIS agreed to help collect data from the US and interested jurisdictions that will aid in the development of the AM.
