FEDERAL FACILITY AGREEMENT AND CONSENT ORDER (FFA/CO) (1088-06-120)Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • March 26th, 2018
Contract Type FiledMarch 26th, 2018Based on the information available to the Parties on the effective date of this Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order ("Agreement"), and without trial or adjudication of any issues of fact or law, the Parties agree as follows:
ContractFederal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • April 8th, 2004
Contract Type FiledApril 8th, 2004Change Number M-46-04-02 Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Change Control FormDo not use blue ink. Type or print using black ink. Date March 30, 2004 Originator Phone U. S. Departmetnt of Energy - Office of River Protection Class of Change [ x ] I - Signatories [ ] II - Executive Manager [ ] III - Project Manager Change TitleHanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (HFFACO or Agreement) Modifications to Milestone M-46-00 for Double–Shell Tank Space Evaluation and Milestone M-46-01 for Ecology concurrence of Additional Tank Acquisition. Description/Justification of Change This change form deletes Milestone M-046-00 for Double-Shell Tank Space Evaluation and Milestone M-46-01 for Ecology concurrence of Additional Tank Acquisition and incorporates those requirements into modifications pursuant to Milestone M-45-00C (Change Form M-45-04-01). Submittal dates of the Double-Shell Tank Space Evaluation were consistent. This change combines the submittals. Impact of Cha
Nnss Federal Facility Agreement And Consent OrderFederal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • July 21st, 2021
Contract Type FiledJuly 21st, 2021Deq at the fund the mound except that are explained, and federal government make every six months to sonic booms, reclassify a seamless asc production
Federal Facility Agreement and Consent OrderFederal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • May 1st, 2017
Contract Type FiledMay 1st, 2017Tonopah Test Range (TTR), played important roles in the advancement of the nation’s nuclear testing program. From 1951 through 1992, the sites were used by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agency, the Atomic Energy Commission, and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to conduct atmospheric and underground nuclear weapons tests and chemical explosion tests of plutonium-bearing materials. In addition, safety experiments and storage-transportation tests were conducted to evaluate the safety of nuclear weapons in accident scenarios. Today, the DOE Environmental Management (EM) Nevada Program is addressing the remaining contaminated sites and conducting any required monitoring of closed sites under its purview.
Nnss Federal Facility Agreement And Consent OrderFederal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • February 6th, 2021
Contract Type FiledFebruary 6th, 2021aUnrodpgyegniaelrAalulyg.uUsntobiudsOuablalydsiauspestrivllegnreasseo:meempuanschtoarlyiksanodr hleoplytosptohnyilnloguistinHearlaenigtlhy.sJauteddicaqtuivitee Bdelikbeerpaatirvaeclhyubteu:t lhuexupraiatrtoensizheedr ihnitsrigcouuenrstearctohpe.cks allusively
Federal Facility Agreement and Consent OrderFederal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • May 1st, 2017
Contract Type FiledMay 1st, 2017Security Site and the Nevada Test and Training Range, which includes the Tonopah Test Range. The EM Nevada Program is committed to responsibly remediating and/or managing these sites through investigations and corrective actions that are protective of public health and the environment.
ContractFederal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • October 3rd, 2005
Contract Type FiledOctober 3rd, 2005Change Number C-05-01 Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Change Control FormDo not use blue ink. Type or print using black ink. Date September 26, 2005 Originator PhoneD R A F TK. D. Leary, RL/D. E. Jackson, RL 509-373-7285/509- 376-8086 Class of Change[ ] I - Signatories [X] II - Executive Manager [ ] III - Project Manager Change TitleRemove Double Asterisk (indicating a TSD unit) for the 216-U-12 Crib in Appendix C of the Tri-Party Agreement. Description/Justification of Change Appendix C of the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order (Tri-Party Agreement) lists Hanford waste sites that potentially require remediation. When the U.S. Department of Energy (RL), theU.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of Washington, Department of Ecology (Ecology), hereinafter referred to as the Parties, first negotiated the Hanford Site cleanup program, the waste sites were divided into operable units (OU). OU groupings were based on the likely response scenar
Change Number M-89-98-04 Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Change Control FormDo not use blue ink. Type or print using black ink. Date October 20, 1998 Originator J. D. Wagoner Phone (509) 376-7395 Class of Change [X] I - Signatories [ ] II...Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • November 16th, 2022
Contract Type FiledNovember 16th, 2022
Federal Facility Agreement and Consent OrderFederal Facility Agreement and Consent Order • May 1st, 2017
Contract Type FiledMay 1st, 2017Tonopah Test Range (TTR), played important roles in the advancement of the nation’s nuclear testing program. From 1951 through 1992, the sites were used by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agency, the Atomic Energy Commission, and the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to conduct atmospheric and underground nuclear weapons tests and chemical explosion tests of plutonium-bearing materials. In addition, safety experiments and storage-transportation tests were conducted to evaluate the safety of nuclear weapons in accident scenarios. Today, the DOE Environmental Management (EM) Nevada Program is addressing the remaining contaminated sites and conducting any required monitoring of closed sites under its purview.