THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDAJudicial Review • February 20th, 2024
This appeal is from the judgement of the High Court at Kampala delivered by Hon. Justice J.P.M. Tabaro on 28.09.09 in a Judicial Review application number H.C.T-00-CV-MA-556 of 2008.
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDAJudicial Review • December 26th, 2024
This appeal is from the judgement of the High Court at Kampala delivered by Hon. Justice J.P.M. Tabaro on 28.09.09 in a Judicial Review application number H.C.T-00- CV-MA-556 of 2008.
Canadian National Railway v. SeeleyJudicial Review • March 21st, 2013
Application by CN for judicial review of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal decision allowing the respondent's complaint of human rights discrimination because of family status by her
OS (JR) NO. 144 OF 2018Judicial Review • August 10th, 2024
JUDICIAL REVIEW – Application challenging grant of a forest clearing authority – section 90A(2) & (3) of the Forestry Act 1991 – whether correct forms were used to obtain consents and ownership of land verifications from the landowners – Form 276 and Form 253 of the Forestry (Amendment) Regulation 2009 – whether a lands officer is authorised to witness Form 253 – whether there was breach of natural justice – whether the findings could also constitute constructive fraud – whether the 1st and 2nd defendants have acted in a way that was so unreasonable that no reasonable public body would have acted accordingly – whether the court should exercise its discretion and grant the relief certiorari
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE OF JAMAICA CIVIL DIVISIONJudicial Review • May 5th, 2020
BETWEEN NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK APPLICANT JAMAICA LIMITED AND THE INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES TRIBUNAL FIRST RESPONDENT AND PETER JENNINGS SECOND RESPONDENT
Adams Lake Indian Band v. British Columbia (Lieutenant Governor in Council)Judicial Review • March 17th, 2011
Aboriginal law -- Aboriginal lands -- Duties of the Crown -- Fair dealing and reconciliation -- Consultation and accommodation -- Honour of the Crown -- Practice and procedure -- Appeals and judicial review -- Petition by Adams Lake Indian Band for judicial review of Lieutenant Governor in Council's decision to grant incorporated status to Sun Peaks mountain ski resort community allowed -- Band was part of Secwepemc Nation, which claimed aboriginal rights and title to lands encompassing Sun Peaks -- Province did not fulfill its constitutional duty to consult with Band with respect to incorporation of Municipality -- Province ordered to engage in consultation process to uphold honour of Crown and in manner that reflected strength of claims and serious impact on Band's interests.
BetweenJudicial Review • November 14th, 2012
Administrative law -- Judicial review and statutory appeal -- Practice and procedure -- Orders -- Variation or amendment of orders -- Constitutional issues -- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- Application by Globe & Mail to vary an order restricting access to information al- lowed in part -- Previous order sealed a file to prevent serious risk to the proper administration of justice -- Applicants claimed that the order should be quashed and that the file should be unsealed to give the public and media access to the Information to Obtain -- Respondents claimed that the release of the Information to Obtain would pose a serious risk to the proper administration of jus- tice -- The order was varied to allow a redacted version to be released.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEJudicial Review • May 3rd, 2021
OS (JR) NO. 648 OF 2017Judicial Review • July 31st, 2023
JUDICIAL REVIEW – Review of Registrar of Title’s decision to issue replacement titles – State leases – Exercise of power – Reasonableness of exercise of power – Duty to publish notice – Duty to act reasonably and fairly
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEJudicial Review • July 29th, 2022
Mr. Martin A. George, instructed by Ms. Sherisse Walker for the Claimant Mr. Keith Scotland instructed by Ms. Keisha Kydd-Hannibal for the Defendant
Sandringham Place Inc. v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission)Judicial Review • December 9th, 2008
Application by Sandringham Place for judicial review of a decision of the respondent Ontario Human Rights Commission to remit certain complaints to a Board of Inquiry. Sandringham was a real property developer. The purchaser of one of its properties entered into a lease with one of the complainants, the Brampton Children's Residential Services, whose intention was to operate a group home. A restrictive covenant on title to all the properties in the development provided that all houses were for the use of
Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development v. Canada (Attorney General)Judicial Review • January 8th, 2016
Assessment Act -- Judicial review -- Application by the Pembina Institute for Appropriate Development et al. for judicial review pursuant to ss. 18 and 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act respecting a report by the Joint Review Panel Established by the Alberta Energy and Utilities Board and the Government of Canada concerning an environmental impact assessment of the Kearl Oil Sands Project -- Application allowed in part -- Matter was remitted back to the same Panel with the direction to provide a rationale for its conclusion that the proposed mitigation measures would reduce the potentially adverse effects of the Project's greenhouse gas emissions.
COMMONWEALTH OF THE BAHAMAS IN THE COURT OF APPEALJudicial Review • February 2nd, 2017
Appearances: Mr. Kahlil Parker with Ms. Roberta Quant for the Appellant Mrs. Sophia Thompson-Williams with Mrs. Yolanda Ward- Yallop for the Respondent
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEJudicial Review • January 26th, 2018
