Standard Contracts
Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • March 16th, 2004
18th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • April 25th, 2014
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department have been implementing the reforms outlined in Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (“the Agreement”) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
NEGOTIATED DISPOSITION:Negotiated Settlement Agreement • November 14th, 2024
Pursuant to section 221 (a)(4)(E)1 of the Board of Ethics and Government Accountability Establishment and Comprehensive Ethics Reform Amendment Act of 2011, effective April 27, 2012,
17th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • February 25th, 2013
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department have been implementing the reforms outlined in Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (“the Agreement”) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • December 14th, 2007
The Negotiated Settlement Agreement (Agreement) requires the Oakland Police Department to conduct an in-depth review of its entire operations with the aim of becoming a stronger and better Department grounded on service and respect for its community. Since I became the Chief of Police of the Department, improving the Department consistent with the provisions of the Agreement has remained one of my top priorities, along with reorganizing the Department to make its operations more efficient and responsive, protecting the safety of our members, and finding ways to alleviate the crime in the City. I believe that my goals are in part with those of our City leaders and with the expectations of the community in Oakland. We have and continue to encounter challenges along our way of becoming compliant with the Agreement, including the need for more officers and resources to respond to the many demands placed on us by our city leaders and the Oakland community. But we have faced these challenges
Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • October 22nd, 2010
Task 01: IAD Staffing and Resources 14 Task 02: Timeliness Standards and Compliance with IAD Investigations 14 Task 03: IAD Integrity Tests 15 Task 04: Complaint Control System for IAD 17 Task 05: Complaint Procedures for IAD 17 Task 06: Refusal to Accept or Refer Citizen Complaints 22 Task 07: Methods for Receiving Citizen Complaints 23 Task 08: Classifications of Citizen Complaints 24 Task 09: Contact of Citizen Complainant 25 Task 10: Procedure Manual for Investigations of Citizen Complaints 25 Task 11: Summary of Citizen Complaints Provided to OPD Personnel 26 Task 12: Disclosure of Possible Investigator Bias 27 Task 13: Documentation of Pitchess Responses 29 Task 14: Investigation of Allegations of Manual of Rules ViolationsResulting from Lawsuits and Legal Claims 29 Task 15: Reviewing Findings and Disciplinary Recommendations 30 Task 16: Supporting IAD Process – Supervisor/Managerial Accountability 30 Task 17: Audit, Review and Evaluation of IAD Functions 31
20th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • March 9th, 2015
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department (OPD) have been implementing the reforms outlined in the Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (NSA) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE PRECOMPLAINT(S) OF Or NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE FORMAL COMPLAINT(S) OFNegotiated Settlement Agreement • September 18th, 2020
Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • April 28th, 2011
Mobile Data Terminal Traffic 4 Complaint Procedures for IAD – Task 5.17 5 Summary of Citizen Complaints Provided to OPD Personnel – Task 11 5 Witness Identification and Documentation – Task 18.2.2 6 Force Review Board – Task 26.1 (Veritas) 7 Executive Force Review Board – Task 30.1 (Veritas) 7 Vehicle Stops, Field Investigation and Detentions – Task 34 (OIG) 8 Vehicle Stops, Field Investigation and Detentions – Task 34 (Veritas) 8 Use of Force Reports – Witness Identification – Task 35 9 Promotional Consideration - Task 46.2 9
Oakland Police Department Negotiated Settlement Agreement - Compliance Status and Task RequirementsNegotiated Settlement Agreement • September 25th, 2020
Task Out of Compliance Requirements for Task Completion 2 Timeliness with Internal Affair Division (IAD) Investigations Requirements:Fairness to complainants, members/employees and the public requires that internal investigations be completed in a timely fashion.1. On or before December 1, 2003, OPD shall develop policies regarding timeliness standards for the completion of Internal Affairs investigations, administrative findings and recommended discipline.2. Compliance with these timeliness standards shall be regularly monitored by IAD command and the Department’s command staff. If IAD experiences an unusual proliferation of cases and/or workload, IAD staffing shall be increased tomaintain timeliness standards. (Negotiated Settlement Agreement III. B.) 5 Complaint Procedures for IAD Requirements:1. On or before December 1, 2003, OPD shall develop a policy so that, OPD personnel who become aware that a citizen wishes to file a complaint shall bring such citizen immediately, or as soon
Preliminary 2010 Revenue RequirementsNegotiated Settlement Agreement • October 1st, 2009
Negotiated Settlement Agreement June 4, 2021Negotiated Settlement Agreement • June 4th, 2021
The Commission may, within 30 days of the date of this decision and without notice, correct typographical, spelling and calculation errors and other similar types of errors and post the corrected decision on its website.
Re: Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (“ICBC”) Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • April 27th, 2005
Further to your letter of April 22nd, Log No. 9398 I hereby have pleasure in accepting the Negotiated Settlement Agreement on behalf of Family Insurance Solutions.
Negotiated Settlement Agreements in Eviction CasesNegotiated Settlement Agreement • December 20th, 2021
Caitlin Cedfeldt is a 2014 graduate of the University of Nebraska College of Law. After starting her career in private practice, she joined Legal Aid of Nebraska in 2018, where she has been litigating housing and consumer debt cases ever since.
Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • August 26th, 2009
Task 01: IAD Staffing and Resources 19 Task 02: Timeliness Standards and Compliance with IAD Investigations 19 Task 03: IAD Integrity Tests 21 Task 04: Complaint Control System for IAD 21 Task 05: Complaint Procedures for IAD 23 Task 06: Refusal to Accept or Refer Citizen Complaints 28 Task 07: Methods for Receiving Citizen Complaints 29 Task 08: Classifications of Citizen Complaints 31 Task 09: Contact of Citizen Complainant 33 Task 10: Procedure Manual for Investigations of Citizen Complaints 34 Task 11: Summary of Citizen Complaints Provided to OPD Personnel 35 Task 12: Disclosure of Possible Investigator Bias 37 Task 13: Documentation of Pitchess Responses 37 Task 14: Investigation of Allegations of Manual of Rules ViolationsResulting from Lawsuits and Legal Claims 38 Task 15: Reviewing Findings and Disciplinary Recommendations 38 Task 16: Supporting IAD Process – Supervisor/Managerial Accountability 39 Task 17: Audit, Review and Evaluation of IAD Functions 40
19th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • April 25th, 2014
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department have been implementing the reforms outlined in the Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (Agreement) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
