Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • March 16th, 2004
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, RELEASE, AND COVENANT NOT TO SUENegotiated Settlement Agreement • May 20th, 2005 • Reliant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • New Jersey
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, covenants, and agreements made in this agreement (this “AGREEMENT”) by and between Joseph J. Krivulka (“EMPLOYEE,” a term which includes EMPLOYEE himself, EMPLOYEE’s spouse, and all assigns, heirs, and successors in interest) and RELIANT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (“RELIANT,” a term which for the purposes of this Agreement includes RELIANT, any and all parent, subsidiary, and affiliate corporations), the parties agree as follows:
18th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • April 25th, 2014
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department have been implementing the reforms outlined in Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (“the Agreement”) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
17th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • February 25th, 2013
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department have been implementing the reforms outlined in Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (“the Agreement”) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • December 14th, 2007
The Negotiated Settlement Agreement (Agreement) requires the Oakland Police Department to conduct an in-depth review of its entire operations with the aim of becoming a stronger and better Department grounded on service and respect for its community. Since I became the Chief of Police of the Department, improving the Department consistent with the provisions of the Agreement has remained one of my top priorities, along with reorganizing the Department to make its operations more efficient and responsive, protecting the safety of our members, and finding ways to alleviate the crime in the City. I believe that my goals are in part with those of our City leaders and with the expectations of the community in Oakland. We have and continue to encounter challenges along our way of becoming compliant with the Agreement, including the need for more officers and resources to respond to the many demands placed on us by our city leaders and the Oakland community. But we have faced these challenges
20th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • March 9th, 2015
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department (OPD) have been implementing the reforms outlined in the Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (NSA) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
FortisBC Inc. 2008 Revenue Requirements Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • November 23rd, 2007
FortisBC Inc. (“FortisBC” or the “Company”) filed its Preliminary 2008 Revenue Requirements on October 1, 2007, in accordance with the terms of a Multi-Year Performance Based Regulation Plan (“PBR Plan”) approved by way of British Columbia Utilities Commission (the “Commission”) Order No. G-58-06.
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASENegotiated Settlement Agreement • July 14th, 2017 • Anika Therapeutics, Inc. • Surgical & medical instruments & apparatus • Massachusetts
This Negotiated Settlement Agreement (hereinafter the "Agreement") is made by and between Stephen Mascioli, M.D., MPH (“Mascioli” or “Complainant”), and Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (“Anika”).
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE PRECOMPLAINT(S) OF Or NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE FORMAL COMPLAINT(S) OFNegotiated Settlement Agreement • September 18th, 2020
Negotiated Settlement AgreementNegotiated Settlement Agreement • April 28th, 2011
Mobile Data Terminal Traffic 4 Complaint Procedures for IAD – Task 5.17 5 Summary of Citizen Complaints Provided to OPD Personnel – Task 11 5 Witness Identification and Documentation – Task 18.2.2 6 Force Review Board – Task 26.1 (Veritas) 7 Executive Force Review Board – Task 30.1 (Veritas) 7 Vehicle Stops, Field Investigation and Detentions – Task 34 (OIG) 8 Vehicle Stops, Field Investigation and Detentions – Task 34 (Veritas) 8 Use of Force Reports – Witness Identification – Task 35 9 Promotional Consideration - Task 46.2 9
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE PRECOMPLAINT(S) OFNegotiated Settlement Agreement • January 13th, 2003
Including ROE Update as per Order G-158-09 Financial SchedulesNegotiated Settlement Agreement • December 23rd, 2009
Approved Increase or Forecast 2009 (Decrease) 2010 ($000s) 1 Sales Volume (GWh) 3,107 3,199 2 Rate Base 907,977 975,113 3 Return on Rate Base 7.38% 7.73% 4 5 REVENUE DEFICIENCY 6 7 POWER SUPPLY 8 Power Purchases 70,944 6,883 77,827 9 Water Fees 8,480 588 9,068 10 79,424 7,471 86,895 11 OPERATING 12 O&M Expense 46,573 1,072 47,645 13 Capitalized Overhead (9,315) (214) (9,529) 14 Wheeling 4,010 9 4,019 15 Other Income (4,915) (110) (5,025) 16 36,353 756 37,109 17 TAXES 18 Property Taxes 11,561 987 12,548 19 Income Taxes 4,354 1,046 5,400 20 15,915 2,033 17,948 21 FINANCING 22 Cost of Debt 34,803 1,962 36,765 23 Cost of Equity 32,215 6,399 38,614 24 Depreciation and Amortization 37,504 4,524 42,028 25 104,522 12,886 117,407 26 27 Prior Year Incentive True Up 173 (495) (322) 28 Flow Through Adjustments (435) (633) (1,068) 29 AFUDC / CWIP shortfall - - 30 ROE Sharing Incentives (1,181) (118) (1,300) 31 (1,443) (
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTNegotiated Settlement Agreement • July 7th, 2019
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, RELEASE, AND COVENANT NOT TO SUENegotiated Settlement Agreement • May 20th, 2005 • Reliant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. • New Jersey
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, covenants, and agreements made in this agreement (this “Agreement”) by and between KEITH ROTENBERG, PH.D. (“Employee”, a term which includes EMPLOYEE himself, EMPLOYEE’s spouse, and all assigns, heirs, and successors in interest) and RELIANT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (“Reliant”, a term which for the purposes of this Agreement includes RELIANT, any and all parent, subsidiary, and affiliate corporations), the parties agree as follows:
19th Annual ReportNegotiated Settlement Agreement • April 25th, 2014
Since January 22, 2003, the City of Oakland and the Oakland Police Department have been implementing the reforms outlined in the Negotiated Settlement Agreement1 (Agreement) with the goal of transforming the Department into a model agency with superior police practices. The Department has striven to implement such practices in the areas of supervision, accountability, police intervention programs, use of force, and misconduct investigations.
NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, RELEASE, AND COVENANT NOT TO SUENegotiated Settlement Agreement • March 2nd, 2009 • Idex Corp /De/ • Pumps & pumping equipment
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises, covenants, and agreements made by and between BRADLEY A. SPIEGEL (“EMPLOYEE”, a term which includes himself/herself and all assigns, heirs, and successors in interest) and IDEX SERVICE CORP., INC. (“COMPANY”, a term which includes IDEX Service Corp., Inc., parent, subsidiary, or affiliated companies, as well as the officers, directors, shareholders, employees, agents, attorneys and contractors of each), the parties agree as follows:
