Re: Industrial Bank of Korea – Deferred Prosecution AgreementProsecution Agreement • April 20th, 2020
Contract Type FiledApril 20th, 2020Pursuant to the understandings specified below, the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (the “Office”) and defendant Industrial Bank of Korea (“IBK”), under authority granted by its Board of Directors in the form of a Board Resolution (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), hereby enter into this Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the “Agreement”).
Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Dpa) Concept In The System Of Criminal Jurisdiction In IndonesiaProsecution Agreement • March 28th, 2022
Contract Type FiledMarch 28th, 2022This study aims to determine the application of the DPA concept in the criminal justice sys- tem in Indonesia. This research also analyzes the stages and mechanisms for implementing DPA in the justice system in Indonesia. The research method used is juridical normative or literature research related to normative legal substances, to find the truth based on scientific logic from a normative perspective by examining library materials or secondary data consist- ing of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The research results show that the concept of DPA in the criminal justice system in Indonesia needs to consider several things: DPA, which will be applied in Indonesia, must consider the Indonesian judicial system in its constitutional structure and legal tradition. The impact of regulatory and compliance burdens on corporations, where corporations require additional costs. Crimes that can use the DPA mechanism are serious (but not limited), so a special law is required
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) CRIMINAL NO. 1:04 M 1133 v. ) ) VIOLATION: AMERICA ONLINE, INC, ) 18 U.S.C. ss. 2 ) (Aiding & Abetting) Defendant. ) 15 U.S.C. ss.ss. 78j(b); 78ff; ) Title 17 C.F.R. Section ) 240.10b-5 (Securities Fraud)Prosecution Agreement • December 15th, 2004 • Time Warner Inc • Services-motion picture & video tape production
Contract Type FiledDecember 15th, 2004 Company Industry
The InterMune Settlement: Deferred Prosecution Agreements in the Context of Off-Label InvestigationsProsecution Agreement • December 13th, 2006
Contract Type FiledDecember 13th, 2006– U.S. stated that “the vast majority of Actimmune sales during the period of August 2002 through January 2003 were attributable to prescriptions for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) for which there is no FDA-approved treatment”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTProsecution Agreement • January 30th, 2008
Contract Type FiledJanuary 30th, 2008The United States Attorney's Office for the District of Rhode Island ("USAO-RI" or "Government") and Roger Williams Medical Center ("RWMCtt), hereby enter into this Deferred Prosecution A eement (the "Agreement").
ContractProsecution Agreement • March 27th, 2024
Contract Type FiledMarch 27th, 2024
DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENTProsecution Agreement • April 18th, 2022
Contract Type FiledApril 18th, 2022encourage employees to abide by them. The Company will create and foster a culture of ethics and compliance with the law in their day-to-day operations at all levels of the Company.
Re: Industrial Bank of Korea – Deferred Prosecution AgreementProsecution Agreement • April 20th, 2020
Contract Type FiledApril 20th, 2020Pursuant to the understandings specified below, the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (the “Office”) and defendant Industrial Bank of Korea (“IBK”), under authority granted by its Board of Directors in the form of a Board Resolution (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A), hereby enter into this Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the “Agreement”).
Deferred Prosecution Agreement between JPMorgan and the US Government in Madoff Ponzi Scheme ScandalProsecution Agreement • February 15th, 2016
Contract Type FiledFebruary 15th, 2016of the US Attorney for the Sourthern District of New York, in which JPMorgan agreed to pay 1.7 billi on dollars penalties (the "Stipulated Forfeiture Amount"). In the investigation of the scandal, JPMorga n admits its wrongdoing related to the Madoff Scandal with
United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 March 26, 2007Prosecution Agreement • May 10th, 2007 • Electronic Clearing House Inc • Functions related to depository banking, nec
Contract Type FiledMay 10th, 2007 Company Industry
The SEC’s First Non-Prosecution AgreementProsecution Agreement • January 20th, 2011
Contract Type FiledJanuary 20th, 2011Editor’s Note: Wayne Carlin is a partner in the Litigation Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton firm memorandum by Mr. Carlin, Theodore A. Levine and David B. Anders.
DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENTProsecution Agreement • November 5th, 2010 • Transocean Ltd. • Drilling oil & gas wells
Contract Type FiledNovember 5th, 2010 Company Industry
Deferred Prosecution Agreement: A tool to deter environmental crime by corporations in MalaysiaProsecution Agreement • July 28th, 2023
Contract Type FiledJuly 28th, 2023
DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENTProsecution Agreement • January 18th, 2017 • Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. • Orthopedic, prosthetic & surgical appliances & supplies
Contract Type FiledJanuary 18th, 2017 Company IndustryDefendant Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Zimmer Biomet” or the “Company”), pursuant to authority granted by the Company’s Board of Directors, and the United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section (the “Fraud Section”), enter into this deferred prosecution agreement (the “Agreement”).
Deferred Prosecution Agreement Page 2 of 2 Intake Case No.Prosecution Agreement • September 17th, 2020
Contract Type FiledSeptember 17th, 2020An inquiry has been conducted into this matter. It has been determined that at this time neither the interests of the juvenile named above nor of the public require filing of a petition for circumstances relating to §§938.12 to 938.14, Wisconsin Statutes. It is this worker's belief, however, that the facts are sufficient that court action could be sought, and this conclusion is undisputed by the juvenile and parents, guardian or legal custodian.