RATER AGREEMENT:Rater Agreement • January 3rd, 2024
To qualify for participation in the 2024 TNMP High-Performance Homes Program (“Agreement”), this Agreement is made by and between _ _ _ _
Rater Agreement:Rater Agreement • January 3rd, 2023
To qualify for participation in the 2023 AEP Texas High-Performance Homes Program (“Agreement”), this Agreement is made by and between (“Rater”) and ICF Resources, L.L.C. (“ICF”). ICF is the Program Administrator (“Program Administrator”) of AEP Texas’ 2023 High- Performance New Homes Market Transformation Program (“Program”). This Agreement is effective on the date the last party executes this Agreement.
RATER AGREEMENT IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT IN THE SPANISH UNIVERSITY ACCESS EXAMINATION BATTERYRater Agreement • April 20th, 2008
The reliability of scores is of utmost importance in an examining context in which tenths of a point are often decisive in determining a student's course of study. In Spain, access to university studies is determined by passing a battery of examinations, one of which is in modern language, with English as the most widely chosen language. Two experiments using the English language test from the province of Valencia were carried out to test the hypothesis that enhanced assessment criteria would increase rater agreement, and thus the reliability of the scores. The criteria were focused holistic for the four constructed-response questions on the test, which represent 70% of the total grade. One experiment compared the scores on one hundred test papers given by four raters using the new criteria with the scores on the same one hundred papers given by four different raters following the criteria currently used. Results showed significantly higher agreement among the raters who used the enhan
Measure 3. Teacher Candidates’ Dispositions Means and Instrument Rater AgreementRater Agreement • May 3rd, 2023
Teacher candidates’ dispositions are regularly observed and evaluated by college faculty, college supervisors, and clinical instructors. Each of the 38 items on the evaluation instrument are aligned with InTASC Standards and reflect the dispositions needed to teach effectively. Rater agreement is a way to establish how closely the clinical instructors’ and college supervisors’ evaluations of teacher candidates align. When candidates are
CalCERTS, Inc.Rater Agreement • August 19th, 2013 • California
This Rater Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made by and between CalCERTS, Inc. (“CalCERTS”) and the individual identified on the signature page hereto seeking certification as a Rater (as defined below) pursuant to the California Home Energy Rating System Regulations set forth at California Code of Regulations, Title 20, Section 1670 et seq., and related applicable authority (“HERS Regulations”).
Measure 3. Teacher Candidates’ Dispositions Means and Instrument Rater AgreementRater Agreement • May 7th, 2024
Teacher candidates’ dispositions are regularly observed and evaluated by college faculty, college supervisors, and clinical instructors. Each of the 38 items on the evaluation instrument are aligned with InTASC Standards and reflect the dispositions needed to teach effectively. Rater agreement is a way to establish how closely the clinical instructors’ and college supervisors’ evaluations of teacher candidates align. When candidates are
RATER AGREEMENT:Rater Agreement • February 5th, 2016 • Texas
To qualify for participation in the 2016 TNMP High-Performance Homes Program (the “Agreement”) is made by and between (“Rater”) and ICF Resources, L.L.C. (“ICF”). ICF is the Program Administrator (“Program Administrator”) of TNMP’s 2016 High- Performance Homes Market Transformation Program (“Program”). The Agreement is effective on the date the last party executes this Agreement.
Rater Agreement Mead School DistrictRater Agreement • June 7th, 2016
• Describe the role of observation as a methodology for gathering evidence of educator performance and its role in achieving rater agreement.
Rater Agreement in Washington State’s Evaluation SystemRater Agreement • November 2nd, 2012
The new Washington State Evaluation System for teachers and principals will require new learning and ongoing support to increase the effectiveness of implementation.
Measure 2. Student Teachers’ Dispositions Instrument Rater AgreementRater Agreement • April 30th, 2021
Teacher candidates’ dispositions are regularly observed and evaluated by college faculty, college supervisors, and clinical instructors. Each of the 38 items on the evaluation instrument are aligned with InTASC Standards and reflect the dispositions needed to teach effectively. Rater agreement is a way to establish how closely the clinical instructors’ and college supervisors’ evaluations of teacher candidates align. When candidates are evaluated, the clinical instructor and college supervisor each independently code an observation using the
Rater Agreement in Washington State’s Evaluation SystemRater Agreement • November 1st, 2020
The new Washington State Evaluation System for teachers and principals will require new learning and ongoing support to increase the effectiveness of implementation. The five framework authors would like to underscore the importance of the shared experience between evaluator and evaluatee.
