Statistical Analysis Agreement Sample Contracts

Appendix
Statistical Analysis Agreement • June 26th, 2017

Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) was used to evaluate interobserver agreement for first- choice diagnosis. Weighted kappa coefficient (κw) was used to evaluate interobserver agreement for an estimation of the probability of each diagnosis. This approach has been used in previous investigations of interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of diffuse lung diseases (1, 2). The percentage diagnostic likelihood given for each diagnosis was converted to a 5-point scale (0–4), representing clinically useful probabilities: 0 = condition not included in the differential diagnosis, 1 = low probability (5–25%), 2 = intermediate probability (30–65%), 3 = high probability (70–95%), and 4 = pathognomonic (100%). For example, if the differential diagnoses given by a physician were IPF (70% diagnostic likelihood), NSIP (20% diagnostic likelihood) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (10% diagnostic likelihood), the probability grades for IPF, NSIP and hypersensitivity pneumonitis for this case would be 3, 1

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Appendix A
Statistical Analysis Agreement • October 10th, 2019

Figure S2. Bland-Altman plots of differences between GH space values, displayed in pixels (A) percentages (B) and log-transformed

AGREEMENT BETWEEN OBSERVATION AND THEORETICAL MODEL: ANDERSON DARLING STATISTIC
Statistical Analysis Agreement • June 3rd, 2015

The values calculated by the implemented program for estimation are concordant with the values obtained by Monte Carlo simulation for 10-9 ≤ p ≤ 1-10-9 with relative standard deviation in average per pooled sample containing whole data for 2 ≤ n ≤ 46 less than 0.1‰.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!