SyntaxVehicle Requirement on Merge • December 16th, 2021
Such an analysis begs the question as to why φ-agreement is not realized twice: once on the verb, once on T (e.g., via do-support), or twice on the verb, see (37-b,c). It therefore requires further assumptions.
SyntaxVehicle Requirement on Merge • January 21st, 2023
It is much harder to reach such unambiguous evidence in favor of downward agreement by looking at languages that show object agreement that is presumably related to v (alongside subject agreement related to T).
SyntaxVehicle Requirement on Merge • January 29th, 2021
Such an analysis begs the question as to why φ-agreement is not realized twice: once on the verb, once on T (e.g., via do-support), or twice on the verb, see (35-b,c). It therefore requires further assumptions.
