Work for Others Agreement No. ERD-01-2066 BetweenWork for Others Agreement • June 13th, 2001 • Sense Holdings Inc • Services-miscellaneous business services
Contract Type FiledJune 13th, 2001 Company Industry
Work for Others Agreement No. 45658, R2 between Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest Division which operates the PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY under Prime Contract No. DE-AC06-76RL01830 for the U.S. Department of Energy and ISORAY...Work for Others Agreement • April 27th, 2006 • IsoRay, Inc. • Surgical & medical instruments & apparatus
Contract Type FiledApril 27th, 2006 Company IndustryThe obligations of the above-identified DOE Contractor shall apply to any successor in interest to said Contractor continuing the operation of the DOE facility involved in this Work for Others Agreement.
FY09 WFOs, CRADAs, and Stimulus Budget vs. Spent (Burdened)*Work for Others Agreement • April 27th, 2010
Contract Type FiledApril 27th, 2010Proj Name Proj Mgr Agreement End Date FY09 Proj Budget FY01-FY07 Budget FY08 Budget FY09 Budget FY10 Spent thru 3/30/10 Remaining Burn ratesince 2/11/10 Work for Others - Other Federal NASA Nanotube Synthesis Jordan 3/31/10 BNNT 97.0 96.7 0.3 1.0 NASA Nanotube Synthesis (contd) Jordan 9/30/09 BNNT2 194.2 188.8 5.4 0.0 Contd Boron Nitrate Effort Jordan 9/30/10 BNNT3 145.6 104.6 41.0 10.0 Cryogenics Engineering Support for NASA Arenius 11/30/09 NASA01 180.1 365.5 545.2 0.4 0.0 Cryogenics Engineering Support for NASA2 Arenius 11/30/09 NASA02 115.0 114.2 0.9 0.0 Cryogenics Engineering Support for NASA3 Arenius 11/30/10 NASA03 480.0 390.3 542.8 327.5 40.0 Work for Others - Industry/Universities Boeing WFO INP Neil, G. 6/8/10 BOEXXX 145.6 146.6 291.7 0.5 8.6 Raytheon WFO INP Shinn 6/8/10 RTNXXX 728.2 1,085.5 1,778.1 35.6 40.8 NIA Advanced Nanotube Jordan 6/30/10 NIA001 25.0 25.0 28.4 21.6 3.6 Johns Hopkins Univ Gamma Camera Weisenberger
WORK FOR OTHERS AGREEMENTWork for Others Agreement • July 14th, 2021
Contract Type FiledJuly 14th, 2021Effective this day of , the TOWN of Mammoth Lakes a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "TOWN," and the State of California, Department of Transportation, District 9, hereinafter referred to as "STATE," have entered into this Agreement.
Project Title:Work for Others Agreement • May 5th, 2020
Contract Type FiledMay 5th, 2020
UT-BATTELLE, LLCWork for Others Agreement • August 4th, 2014 • Tennessee
Contract Type FiledAugust 4th, 2014 JurisdictionThe obligations of the above-identified United States Department of Energy (hereinafter referred to as the “Department” or “DOE”) facility contractor shall apply to any successor in interest to said facility contractor continuing the operation of the DOE facility involved in this Work for Others (WFO) Agreement (the “Agreement”).
WORK FOR OTHERS AGREEMENT NO. BETWEENWork for Others Agreement • November 13th, 2009 • Illinois
Contract Type FiledNovember 13th, 2009 JurisdictionThe obligations of UChicago Argonne, LLC, as Operator of ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY shall apply to any successor in the interest of continuing the operation of ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY.
Work for Others Agreement No. ______ Between The Regents of the University of California as the Management and Operating Contractor for the Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryWork for Others Agreement • February 1st, 2021
Contract Type FiledFebruary 1st, 2021The obligations of the above-identified DOE Contractor shall apply to any successor in interest to said Contractor continuing the operation of the DOE facility involved in this Work for Other Agreement.
Operating under Prime Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL01830 for the U.S. Department of EnergyWork for Others Agreement • April 3rd, 2013
Contract Type FiledApril 3rd, 2013Washington state has the luxury of observing a similar process playing out in Oregon, which is updating its existing territorial sea plan to consider siting of renewable ocean energy. Oregon has worked closely with many stakeholders to define potential conflicts posed by renewable energy to existing uses. Early in the process, however, suitability for energy siting was not considered (suitability from the perspective of desirable or feasible locations for development of ocean energy). This resulted in preliminary maps that relegated future development to sites that were not realistic, economic, or desirable. Realizing this, the state has since worked closely with the ocean renewable energy industry to interject data on renewable energy suitability; this has led to consideration of sites that meet both energy needs while reducing effects on other use groups.