Examples of Associated Construction in a sentence
Associated Construction / A.P. Construction, LLC (“Associated Construction”), a construction contractor, alleges that the issuer of the bonds, Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover” or the “Surety”), and its alleged agents, Scott Adams, Avalon Risk, LLC (“Avalon”), and Lighthouse Management, LLC (“Lighthouse”), failed to perform under the bonds and other related contracts and made misrepresentations in connection with the project.
Associated Construction brings claims for (i) breach of contract (count one); (ii) violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn.
BC Adnoh Holdings decided to use Globe Construction directly for the paving work, so Associated Construction sent a termination letter to Asphalt Solutions for the subcontract.
Associated Construction alleges that Scott Adams, the president of Avalon, represented that “he could not issue a single bond for an amount greater than $2,000,000 but [that] he could issue bonds which in the aggregate [would] reach the proposed contract amount and perform as would a single bond.” (Pl.’s L.R. 56(a)2 Stmt.
The approach of selecting the above officials is because the current research argues that the local methods of climate change adaptation which the governmental implementing bodies can determine, are essential to determine the levels of success of the initiatives determined at the higher levels of governance (SADC level).
Asphalt Solutions argues on appeal that the trial court improperly granted summary disposition in favor of Associated Construction and BC Adnoh Holdings because the subcontract between Asphalt Solutions and Associated Construction was not rescinded through abandonment, waiver or impossibility.
The trial court reasoned that since the subcontract was not terminated in writing by Associated Construction until after it had been rescinded, there was no contractual relationship with which to tortiously interfere.
As a result of the events listed above, Associated Construction brought four claims against Hanover: (i) a breach of contract claim predicated upon Hanover’s alleged breach of the “Performance Bonds’ terms,” along with the disbursement control agreements (“DCAs”) regulating the disbursement of funds to Intext (ECF No. 43 (“Complaint”) at ¶¶ 44-59); (ii) a CUTPA claim based upon all of the conduct listed above (id.
Hanover claims that “[b]y no later than the end of July 2014, the Surety had advised [Associated Construction] that its completion options under the Performance Bonds included a right to pay [Associated Construction] for its completion costs incurred as a result of the Intext terminations in excess of the undisbursed contract balances under each subcontract.” (Def.’s L.R. 56(a)1 Stmt.
Therefore, there was a valid contract between Asphalt Solutions and Associated Construction.