Examples of Vodafone International in a sentence
On February 15, 2016, Liberty Global Europe Holding B.V., a corporation organized under the laws of the Netherlands and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Liberty Global plc (Liberty Global), and Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a corporation organized under the laws of the Netherlands and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vodafone Group Plc ( Vodafone) agreed to form a 50:50 joint venture (the VodafoneZiggo JV ), pursuant to a Contribution and Transfer Agreement.
Following Vodafone International Holdings BV's (“Vodafone”) agreement with Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited (“HTIL”) for the acquisition of a controlling stake in Hutchison Essar Limited (“HEL”), an organization called the Telecom Watchdog filed a civil writ petition before the High Court of Delhi alleging breach of the 74 per cent.
Following Vodafone International Holdings BV's (“Vodafone”) agreement with Hutchison Telecommunications International Limited (“HTIL”) for the acquisition of a controlling stake in Hutchison Essar Limited (“HEL”), an organization called the Telecom Watchdog filed a civil writ petition before the High Court of Delhi alleging breach of the 74% sectoral cap for foreign direct investment by Vodafone in HEL.
The Supreme Court in a recent decision in Vodafone International Holdings B.V. vs.
On March 15, 2005, TIW entered into definitive agreements with Vodafone International Holdings B.V., a wholly owned subsidiary of Vodafone Group Plc, ("Vodafone") for the sale of all of its interests in ClearWave.
In such a case, applying the law laid enunciated in Tata Consultancy Services4 and Vodafone International Holdings BV v.
On 14 May 2017 the Group entered into an agreement with Vodafone International Holdings B.V. (VIHBV) to acquire 87.5% of Vodafone Kenya, which in turn holds 39.94% in Safaricom Limited (Safaricom).
The third quarter of 2008 was when the New Patriotic Party (NPP) government controversially sold a 70% stake in the state-owned telecommunications company, Ghana Telecom (GT), to Vodafone International Holdings BV for about $900 million.
Upon challenging the notice before the Apex Court, it was held that Vodafone International Holdings BV (“VIHBV”) had not acted in violation of the Income Tax Act.The Supreme Court ruled that the selling of the stake to Vodafone by Hutchinson did not constitute a ‘capital asset’ transfer under Section 2(14) of the Income Tax Act.
Similarly, this Court in the case of Vodafone International Holdings B.V. V/s.