Xxxxxxxxx and X Sample Clauses

Xxxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxx.

Xxxxxxxxx and X. X. Xxxxxxxxx, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 4503–4513. 35 X. Xxx and X. X. Xxxxx, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 1262–1271. 36 X. X. Xxxx´ , in Science of Synthesis: Xxxxxx–Weyl Methods of Molecular Transformations, ed. X. X. Xxxxx and X. X. Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Stuttgart, 2004, vol. 13, pp. 415–601. 37 X. X. Xxxx and K. B. Xxxxxxxxx, Drug Discovery Today, 2003, 8, 1128–1137.

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. A secure and e cient conference key distribution system (extended abstract). In A. D. Xxxxxx, editor, EUROCRYPT'94, volume 950 of LNCS, pages 275 286. Springer, May 1994.

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxxxxxx. Shapes constraint language (shacl) - proposed recommendation, 6 2017. [Last accessed on 2017/07/06].

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. A secure and efficient conference key distribution system. In A. D. Xxxxxx, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’94, number 950 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 275–286. International Association for Cryptologic Research, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Germany, 1995. Final version of proceedings.

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. A secure and efficient con- xxxxxxx key distribution system. In Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT ’94, volume 950 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 275–286. Springer-Verlag, 1995. [2] X. Xxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. New directions in cryptography. [3] X. Xxx, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxx. Simple and fault-tolerant key agreement for dynamic collaborative groups. Proc. of 7th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Se- curity, pages 235–244, November 2000. [4] X. Xxx, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxx. Communication-efficient group key agreement. Information Systems Security, Pro- ceedings of the 17th International Information Security Con- xxxxxxx IFIP SEC’01, November 2001. [5] X. X. X. Xxx, J. C. S. Lui, and D. K. Y. Yau. Distributed col- laborative key agreement protocols for dynamic peer groups. Technical report cs-tr-2002-04, Dept of Computer Science and Engineering, Chinese University of Hong Kong, May 2002. Also as CS TR-02-013, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. [6] X. S. Xx, X. X. Xxxx, X. X. Xxxxx, and X. X. Xxx. Batch rekeying for secure group communications. Proceedings of Tenth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW10), May 2001. [7] X. Xxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxx. Kronos: A scalable group re-keying approach for secure multicast. Proc. of IEEE Sym- posium on Security and Privacy 2000, May 2000. [8] X. Xxxxxxxxx. Cryptography and Network Security: Princi- [9] X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxxx. CLIQUES: A new approach to group key agreement. IEEE International Xxx- xxxxxxx on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 380–387, May 1998. [10] X. X. Xxxxxxx, X. X. Xxxxxx, and X. X. Xxxx. Key man- agement for multicast: Issues and architectures. Inter- net draft draft-xxxxxxx-key-arch-00.txt, Internet Engineering Task Force, July 1999. Expires in six months. [11] X. X. Xxxx, X. Xxxxx, and X. X. Xxx. Secure group com- munications using key graphs. Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM’98, September 1998. [12] Y. R. Xxxx, X. S. Li, X. B. Xxxxx, and X. X. Xxx. Reli- able group rekeying: A performance analysis. Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM’01, August 2001. Average number of exponentiations Rebuild Batch Queue-batch (a) = 128 Average number of exponentiations Rebuild Batch Queue-batch (b) = 256 Average number of exponentiations Rebuild Batch Queue-batch

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx. A se ure and e ient onferen e key distribution system. In Advan es in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT, volume 839, pages 275 286. LNCS, 1994.

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxxxx, ‘Breaking the Silence: Why International Organizations Should Acknowledge Customary International Law Obligations to Provide Effective Remedies’, in X. Xxxxxx (ed.), The Role of International Administrative Law at International Organizations (2021), 54 at 81 (‘international organizations affect individuals in ever-expanding ways’); Xxxx and Mégret (2019), at 7 (‘accountability demands have become increasingly hard to shut out. The main reason is the striking emergence of third-party claims. As IOs’ mandates have expanded, it is not surprising that third parties, including individuals and other non-state entities, have on occasion stood to be harmed by them.’); Xxxxxxxx (2017), at 1 (‘Increasingly, international organizations take on State- or quasi- State- like functions in which they exercise control over individuals and societies, particularly in contexts of conflict and transition.’); X. Xxxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx and X.X. Xxxxxxx, ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 15, at 23–25; X. Xxxxxxxx, ‘Securing the Accountability of International Organizations’, (2001) 7 Global Governance 131, at 132 (‘wide range of potential individual rights abuses by international organizations’); X. Xxxxxx, The Responsibility of International Organizations toward Third Parties: Some Basic Principles (1995), at 5 (‘The on-going expansion of the activities of international organizations inevitably generates risks to third parties.’). be expected not to look for similar remedial mechanisms when their interests have or may have been affected by acts, actions or omissions on the part of an international organization’15 It is here that the aforementioned ‘conversation when it comes to IO accountability’ might be advanced.16 That is, the legal regime governing legal claims by private parties against international organisations, particularly the enforcement of such claims, requires further enquiry.17 The matter is not altogether unexplored. For example, in 1995, the Institut de droit international adopted a resolution entitled the ‘Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-fulfilment by International Organizations of their obligations toward third parties’. 18 The resolution aimed to identify the international law on such legal consequences in connection with third-party liability of international organisations under international and domestic law.19 However, the resolution did not as such address the third-party liabilit...

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxx. [Ru(3)(biq)(STF-31)]2+: A lock-and-kill anticancer PACT agent. In preparation for publication.

Xxxxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxxx: A secure and efficient conference key distribution system, in: Advances in Cryptology – Eurocrypt’94, LNCS 950, pp. 275–286, 1994. 14. X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxxx, and X. Xxxxxx: Intercepting mobile communications: The insecurity of 802.11, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking (Mobi- Com’01), July, 2001.